libdwarf soname bump

An update to libdwarf that bumps the soname from 0.12.0 to 2.0.0 is currently building in rawhide. As far as I can tell folly is the only package to require it at build time and it doesn't have a run time dependency so there should be no fallout for other packages. I believe the bump is essentia

Re: A few notes upgrading F41 to F42

On 14/04/2025 12:18, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: I wanted to check it on my local system: $ LC_ALL=C rpm -qf `find /usr/sbin /usr/local/sbin -type f`|sort -u bpftool-7.5.0-2.fc42.x86_64 dnsmasq-2.90-4.fc42.x86_64 file /usr/sbin/avmcapictrl is not owned by any package file /usr/sbin/capiinit is no

Re: forwarding aliases

On 16/01/2025 22:11, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: NB, the "From" rewriting with "via devel" is generally only needed if someone's domain has configured SPF and DMARC, but has *not* also configured DKIM. DMARC checks pass if either SPF or DKIM checks pass. So as long as Fedora's forwarding logic *k

Re: HEADS UP: icu 76 coming to rawhide

On 11/12/2024 08:18, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 05/12/2024 19:22, Pete Walter wrote: I am in the process of updating icu from 74.2 to 76.1 in rawhide It looks like there were some API changes in version 76.1. From the libkiwix package build log: In file included from /usr/include/un

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Switch to git-core (self-contained)

On 04/12/2024 09:11, Petr Pisar wrote: BTW, it seems that "git send-email" is broken in Rawhide: Having installed git-2.47.1-1.fc42.x86_64 package, the subcommand is not available. It seems this is because the git package in F41 and rawhide is more or less equivalent to git-core which is odd i

Re: Should %ldconfig_scripts be removed in Rawhide?

On 22/10/2024 13:17, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 22/10/2024 13:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should:    %ldconfig_scriptlets be removed from Rawhide spec files now? Hasn't been needed since Fedora 28 I think: https://fedoraprojec

Re: Should %ldconfig_scripts be removed in Rawhide?

On 22/10/2024 13:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Either I imagined it or it's a real thing but should: %ldconfig_scriptlets be removed from Rawhide spec files now? Hasn't been needed since Fedora 28 I think: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets Tom -- Tom H

Re: Build failure due to glib change

On 01/09/2024 23:26, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: I can sort of understand the rationale behind that, but I'd like someone who is more actively involved with C++ to give some advice if this is something I should be reporting to the glib folks, or if I should just change the writable string pointe

Re: `Unix-domain socket path "..." is too long (maximum 107 bytes)` can we change that?

On 07/08/2024 12:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 01:09:01PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: With new RPM, I hit the limit in two packages: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-abrt https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-pg Is it RPM, or is it "rspec"?

Re: unfixed CVE-2024-39929 in exim

On 15/07/2024 16:46, Marius Schwarz wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297728 Luckily is not a RCE, but we have an unpatched CVE in Exim .. can someone pls poke the right person for it? There was no reaction to the exim accouncement on OSS and to the bugreport. It was only

mapnik soname bump in rawhide

I've updated mapnik in rawhide to 4.0.0 which includes an soname bump. I've rebuilt python-mapnik and opened a PR for viking to fix it to build against mapnik 4 which I believe covers all the downstream users. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- ___

Re: Fedora & AI Survey Now Live Until July 16th

On 01/07/2024 20:07, Aoife Moloney wrote: I would also like to add that we deliberately took a positive tone for this survey as it is far too easy to find (many) negatives for AI (and for good reason!), and we wanted to try to look at the benefits we could get from AI instead if applied proper

Re: Fedora & AI Survey Now Live Until July 16th

Survey: Please select at most 5 answers User: Selects 2 answers Survey: Please rank all items User: Remembers why they hate surveys and gives up To be clear as there are only two items where I think there is any chance of AI being useful I am unable to rank the others. Tom On 01/07/2024 18:33,

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

On 24/06/2024 18:26, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Not really an issue if you have GSSAPI set up on your system. Such as by installing fedora-chromium-config-gssapi (for Chrome/Chromium users) or by using Firefox which is set up for GSSAPI out-of-the-box. I've never seen Firefox use my kerberos tic

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On 20/06/2024 16:34, Simon Farnsworth wrote: For Pentium and Celeron branded processors, v2 also loses Skylake, Icelake, Haswell, Cometlake, Broadwell and others, even when their matching Core branded processors support x86-64v2 or x86-64v3. That means that you lose all Pentium Silver processo

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes, three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension" Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want to run on ancient hardware. It could be

Re: Spec file using github repo - not tarball

On 21/05/2024 16:37, Dominik Wombacher wrote: I have a case were upstream excludes the test suite from the export [1]. But I want the tests to be part of the package build to validate that everything is fine. So this requires a bit of local git clone and create an own archive file. I can't just

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

On 15/05/2024 13:06, Michael J Gruber wrote: Is this used by Gnome search unconditionally? I might want to use Gnome but not a background indexer/tracker/search engine. Threw me off back then when KDE introcuced something like that. Go to "Search" in the Gnome settings and you can control whic

Re: Firefox 126.0 with DBus service

On 15/05/2024 09:52, Ian McInerney via devel wrote: Also, don't new enabled-by-default services need approval from either FESCO or the Workstation WG according to the packaging docs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/DefaultServices/)? I know the page seems to focus on

Re: Spec file using github repo - not tarball

On 08/05/2024 21:36, Kenneth Goldman wrote: Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example? No, but github can give you a tar ball for any ref you want so why would you need/want to? Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@co

Re: Testing package version is spec file

On 08/05/2024 18:38, Brad Smith wrote: I help maintain a package where upstream changed the process to generate installed documentation. In version 1.30 and newer, the spec file needs to use process A; in versions older than 1.30 (e.g. 1.29.x, etc) the spec file needs to use process B. I am stru

Re: Fedora 40 apache now giving errors

On 24/04/2024 02:28, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: # mkdir /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d/ # vi /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d/override.conf [Service] ProtectHome=false Better than just opening up whole trees again would be to use ReadWritePaths= to specify which paths should be allowed

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

On 08/04/2024 14:47, Fabio Valentini wrote: It is already supposed to be default / preferred since this Fedora 38 Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default I find that quite interesting because while I may have read it at the time I had certainly long since forgotte

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

On 08/04/2024 10:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:08:19AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 04:48:03PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: -1 for existing packages certainly - none of my git commit logs are written with the expectation that

Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

On 07/04/2024 16:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely. Thus, the proposal: - new packages MUST use rpmautospec - packagers SHOULD convert their packages - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages (e.g. when they want to push some fi

Re: dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide

On 28/02/2024 10:05, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: W dniu 27.02.2024 o 22:27, Justin Forbes pisze: In practice, this isn't that much of a lockdown for most fedora users. We give the default user on a system wheel access which means both 'sudo dmesg' and 'journalctl -k' work as is. You wish... $ id

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On 14/02/2024 15:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7 I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it? The answer is th

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7 I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it? The answer is that I'm wrong about it breaking things, because koji uses the unpacked spec file to install dependencies not t

Re: OpenSSL 3.2.1 available in rawhide

On 09/02/2024 13:34, Jarek Prokop wrote: Since the error from the scratch build says "invalid CA certificate" I thought to use some openssl "verification" command, this one seems like I'm on the right path. I have tried more permutations of the command with certificates available in the `spec

Re: Figure out what killed an app (rhbz#2253099)

On 31/01/2024 10:08, Milan Crha wrote: I tried to investigate a rawhide bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253099 which is about Evolution being killed "by something". That's the thing, I do not know what killed it, thus even why it had been killed. It's even not killed after cert

Re: HEADSUP boost and tbb rebuilds starting in a side tag

On 20/01/2024 16:07, Jerry James wrote: Upstream has this in src/tbb/CMakeLists.txt: if (CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 8) set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb) else() set(TBB_PC_NAME tbb32) endif() That makes the pkgconfig file install as tbb32.pc. I don't know why upstream is doing that. Maybe so 64-b

Re: Build error with GCC 14, not even a warning in GCC 13

On 16/01/2024 23:49, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Aleksei Bavshin mailto:aleba...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Ah, I misread the include path. It's our package that is too old :( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/4

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-01-15)

On 16/01/2024 10:43, Florian Weimer wrote: We still don't have approval for the toolchain updates that we need for the mass rebuild (notably Changes/GNUToolchainF40). As far as I can see there isn't even a Fesco ticket for it? The fields in https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/100414 for ti

License correction for rapidjson

The license for rapidjson has been corrected from: MIT to: MIT and BSD-3-Clause Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Wifi MAC Randomization (System Wide)

On 21/12/2023 14:33, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 12/21/23 08:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:52 AM Leigh Scott wrote: I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause issues for users using router mac filtering. What this seems to state is that t

Re: Change of cronie and crontabs CIS compliance

On 06/12/2023 11:08, Ondrej Pohorelsky wrote: The only difference is that if you have populated the cron.deny list, after update it gets saved as .rpmsave and cron.allow is created. If the cron.deny is blank, it will get replaced. Also, if you had cron.allow populated before, it will stay this

Re: old RPM code in my package - safe to remove this bit ?

On 30/11/2023 00:28, Michal Schorm wrote: On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:19 AM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: It hasn't been needed for a long time. Good, thanks. Off it goes. :) It's just making %license an alias for %doc if your building for a release old enough that %license isn'

Re: old RPM code in my package - safe to remove this bit ?

On 30/11/2023 00:14, Michal Schorm wrote: I've stumbled upon this piece of code in my package: # Define license macro if not present %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc} https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mariadb/blob/rawhide/f/mariadb.spec#_322 Git blame points out 7 year old commit: h

Re: Restore access to torrent-file-editor package

On 24/07/2023 14:40, Leigh Scott wrote: You probably got removed for inactivity, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UG3UOKBVJLUWZYEHWL52KPMITPEPEBNF/ Looks like it: https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/36 Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...

Re: Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

On 03/07/2023 17:09, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: On 7/3/23 11:59, Tom Hughes wrote: On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL, I forget

Re: Minified JS and CSS in Node packages

On 03/07/2023 16:41, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: Would it be possible to ensure that Node packages contain only actual source code, as in “the preferred form for making modifications” (quote from GNU GPL, I forget which version)? The simple answer is maybe in principle but in practice it's very

Re: Plans for dhclient / ISC dhcp?

On 30/05/2023 11:57, Florian Weimer wrote: * Richard W. M. Jones: I wonder what our plans are for this package, such as whether we are recommending moving to dhcpcd: https://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd systemd-networkd has an integrated DHCP client, hasn't it? It does yes, and it's wh

Re: Plans for dhclient / ISC dhcp?

On 30/05/2023 11:41, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:10 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/issues/121 We use dhclient to get a DHCP address inside a minimal appliance. To get this out of the way: NetworkManager or systemd are not options. I

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

On 25/04/2023 09:40, Florian Weimer wrote: * Jarek Prokop: Personally, I have accounts on many, many Discourse instances, but I don't think there is a single one I read somewhat regularly. I find the mailing list mode and the notifications rather unpredictable. Maybe an alternative client cou

Re: How to check if a package is retired?

On 25/04/2023 08:55, Florian Weimer wrote: The xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo is supposed to have been retired (see ). How can I check if this is actually the case? A retired packaged should have a commit in srcgit that removes all the contents a

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

On 21/04/2023 18:52, Matthew Miller wrote: "Mailing list mode" was a specific thing in earlier versions of Discourse — it sent a notification for every message posted. This is kind of like going to Hyperkitty and saying "subscribe me to all 600 lists". I don't recommend that. Instead, choose spe

Re: KB layout switching does not work in TB on Rawhide

On 02/03/2023 08:43, Olivier Fourdan wrote: TB still uses Xwayland? By default, yes. If you install thunderbird-wayland then you will get an alternative native Wayland version. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel maili

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 28/02/2023 11:24, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 24/02/2023 09:42, Tom Hughes wrote: Did you miss the bit where I said you needed to change your BR to catch2-devel unless upstream has v3 support? What about Fedora ELN? catch2-devel is not available there. Nothing to do with me. I don'

Re: Update of catch to Catch2 v3

On 24/02/2023 07:48, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 22/02/2023 12:37, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: I have now added catch2 (for Catch2 v2.x) and upgraded the catch package to Catch2 v3.x in rawhide and f38. All my catch-dependent packages are now failing due to the missing catch.hpp

Update of catch to Catch2 v3

As discussed a few weeks ago the Catch testing framework has a slightly weird naming scheme, namely: * Catch (v1.x, actually a branch in Catch2 repository) * Catch2 v2.x * Catch2 v3.x Since Catch2 was released we have had catch1 and catch packages to support both v1.x and v2.x users. I have now

Re: Packages with breaking APIs

On 01/02/2023 11:51, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:46 PM Benson Muite wrote: For Catch, there was an upgrade from 1 to 2. Similarly for FFTW, the main package uses the name FFTW, but it was FFTW3 before hand. Maybe one could use Catch3 or Catch2v3? Then change names later once mo

Re: Packages with breaking APIs

There is already precedent for doing it with catch and I've said that I plan to do it again so I don't know what more you want. Tom On 01/02/2023 10:13, Benson Muite wrote: Packages with breaking APIs between major version changes often keep maintaining the older version for some time after the

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote: I have some packages failed. One of them libtins. Problem is that: error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std'; Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change? See https:/

Re: valgrind on Fedora

On 16/01/2023 08:52, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 2023-01-16 00:31, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: If that doesn't work then some examples would help, at least if you're getting a partial trace, so that we can get some idea of what component it is not able to unwind. ==29692== 30

Re: valgrind on Fedora

On 16/01/2023 08:12, Florian Festi wrote: On 1/16/23 07:10, Gordon Messmer wrote: Does anyone have any hints for improving the information I get from valgrind? Have you installed the debuginfo packages for the packages involved? See man debuginfo-install Making sure debuginfod fetching works

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 23/12/2022 11:45, Naheem Zaffar wrote: On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 08:26, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 23/12/2022 09:20, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I know this is way harder, but the right approach would be having a way > to

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 22/12/2022 19:18, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, Dec 22 2022 at 10:29:29 AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Could we not go for 30 seconds? Personally I think 30 seconds is way too long for desktop users. But it's a lot better than 2 minutes, so if that's what we settle on, I won't compl

Re: SPDX Change update

On 07/11/2022 17:46, Miroslav Suchý wrote: 8. After you migrate your SPEC file, please add the string “SPDX” to the entry of the packages’ %changelog. This is the easiest way to detect the migration has been done. The second best option is to add it to the dist-git commit messa

Re: Failed RPM database migrations

On 28/10/2022 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:29:30PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: The reason it hadn't completed is that rpmdb-migrate.service was enabled on that machine. [was not, I guess?] Yes ;-) Enabling (and starting) that service made it complete. Interesti

Re: Failed RPM database migrations

The reason it hadn't completed is that rpmdb-migrate.service was enabled on that machine. Enabling (and starting) that service made it complete. Tom On 28/10/2022 12:24, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: I have one machine that has failed. It was an upgrade from 35 to 36 done using dnf distro

Re: Failed RPM database migrations

I have one machine that has failed. It was an upgrade from 35 to 36 done using dnf distro-sync but I have plenty of others done the same way that worked. One difference is that it's a machine that wasn't upgraded until August while other ones were done back in May as a result of which the upgrad

Re: Explicit dependency on systemd-rpm-macros now required?

On 14/09/2022 12:11, Florian Weimer wrote: I see some new build failures in rawhide related to systemd RPM macros: Processing files: opencryptoki-3.18.0-4.fc38.s390x error: File must begin with "/": %{_tmpfilesdir}/opencryptoki.conf error: File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/pkcsslotd.service

Re: Confused about what to do about a ticket

On 26/08/2022 14:48, Ron Olson wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114563 was reported against Swift on Rawhide. I fixed the issue and responded on 8/4 that the Koji build was successful, but I got two additional, presumably automated, notes from Ben Cotton and Miro that sugge

Re: Bugzilla: You can't ask Lennart Poettering because that account is disabled.

On 02/07/2022 11:35, Marius Schwarz wrote: Am 02.07.22 um 10:37 schrieb Adam Williamson: Probably not, no. Lennart hasn't maintained PA upstream or downstream for a long time. The current downstream maintainer is Wim Taymans (I think). Can we change the defaults for PA inside bugzilla to Wim

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

On 27/06/2022 17:09, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 27/06/2022 17:05, Thomas Haller wrote: On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 13:09 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: Twice now I have had to go and reconfigure my networks after a Fedora upgrade has changed the MAC assignment policy. Interesting. Are

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

On 27/06/2022 17:05, Thomas Haller wrote: On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 13:09 +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: Twice now I have had to go and reconfigure my networks after a Fedora upgrade has changed the MAC assignment policy. Interesting. Are you sure it was twice? I thought it changed "

Re: F37 Change Proposal: MAC Address Policy none (System-Wide Change)

As I said before I don't care that much what the policy is but I do care very much that Fedora keeps changing it. Twice now I have had to go and reconfigure my networks after a Fedora upgrade has changed the MAC assignment policy. My vote is therefore to leave it as it is so that I don't have to

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

On 27/06/2022 10:02, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 09:11:29AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: On 27/06/2022 08:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 01:20:27PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear Richard, If the only problem is legacy (and unsafe) ciphersuites, l

Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

On 27/06/2022 08:53, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 01:20:27PM +0200, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote: Dear Richard, If the only problem is legacy (and unsafe) ciphersuites, loading the legacy provider will solve this problem. Any clues on how to do that? https://wiki.openssl.org

Re: upstream systemd discussion about MACAddressPolicy for bonds and bridges

On 10/05/2022 14:57, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 5/10/22 02:05, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 10/05/2022 03:12, Dusty Mabe wrote: Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for bond and bridge devices

Re: upstream systemd discussion about MACAddressPolicy for bonds and bridges

On 10/05/2022 03:12, Dusty Mabe wrote: Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for bond and bridge devices. https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047893.html A few of us were

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 06/04/2022 15:36, Chris Adams wrote: One add to that: just because a system has UEFI doesn't mean it supports all the same boot methods equally. I do a lot of network installs, and early UEFI systems I tried had broken PXE support (not sure when this may have changed, as I then didn't try fo

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 05/04/2022 18:51, Robbie Harwood wrote: Right, you need the EFI partition (EFI System Partition, or ESP). I don't remember what we default those to these days - I usually make about 600M, but I need it larger for testing stuff. The partition scheme also needs to be GPT, not MBR. Once that'

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 05/04/2022 18:38, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:31 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 05/04/2022 15:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * There is no migration story from Legacy BIOS to UEFI - repartitioning effectively mandates a reinstall. As a result, we don’t drop support for existing

Re: F37 Change: Deprecate Legacy BIOS (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 05/04/2022 15:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * There is no migration story from Legacy BIOS to UEFI - repartitioning effectively mandates a reinstall. As a result, we don’t drop support for existing Legacy BIOS systems yet, just new installations. This is where I have a problem with this, the fact

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

On 15/03/2022 22:45, Robert Relyea wrote: 1) in fedora 37, provide a policy that turns SHA-1 off. in our testing, we encourage people to run with that policy and write bugs against components. That policy already exists in Fedora 34 and 35 where the FUTURE policy does not allow SHA1 in signat

Re: F37 Change: Curl-minimal as default (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 10/03/2022 11:51, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: Everyone has their own conflicting idea of what is 'minimal'. There's no nice way to solve this problem in Fedora without curl upstream supporting dlopen modules per protoocol, allowing us to packa

Re: Why I get some random notifications from discourse?

On 25/02/2022 19:08, Vít Ondruch wrote: Is that intentional that i get some random notifications from Discourse or what is going on? In past month, I was notified about following topics: * Join us for the EPEL office hours every month [Fedora] epel * Self-intro glaringgibbon [Fedora] introduc

Re: Is NetworkManager-wait-online.service necessary by default?

On 24/02/2022 16:28, Tom Hughes wrote: On 24/02/2022 16:25, Cole Robinson wrote: On 2/23/22 5:22 PM, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 23/02/2022 21:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: a) change libvirt-daemon-driver-storage Requires:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi to

Re: Is NetworkManager-wait-online.service necessary by default?

On 24/02/2022 16:25, Cole Robinson wrote: On 2/23/22 5:22 PM, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 23/02/2022 21:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: a) change libvirt-daemon-driver-storage Requires:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi     to Suggests:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, More

Re: Is NetworkManager-wait-online.service necessary by default?

On 23/02/2022 21:23, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: a) change libvirt-daemon-driver-storage Requires:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi to Suggests:libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, More generally why does installing libvirt neeed to force installation of about ten storage drivers

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On 24/01/2022 12:15, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 2:28 PM Kaleb Keithley > wrote: The long double change is an ABI change, so this is kind of expected. Mass rebuild unfortunately doesn't go according to the dependen

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 24/01/2022 00:30, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm (no idea why it works like this). Probably so the file is replaced atomically, and you either have the old or new version but never a partial version. It works fast in a Mo

Re: gcc-12.0.0-0.4.fc36 in rawhide

On 23/01/2022 10:39, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 14/01/2022 15:31, Jakub Jelinek wrote: gcc 12 snapshot has landed as the system compiler into rawhide today. Another ICE on ppc64le with all packages contains catch2 library. Task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81641

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On 21/01/2022 09:29, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches being added by RPM on ppc64le.  SLOF itself does not appear to add or

Re: ppc64le: SLOF failed to rebuild: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mtune=generic'

On 21/01/2022 09:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81468000 This seems like a compiler bug or a bug in the standard switches being added by RPM on ppc64le. SLOF itself does not appear to add or adjust the -mtune flag. That's not even a ppc64le

Re: Missing ownership /usr/share/locale/ directories

On 01/01/2022 12:01, Fabio Valentini wrote: I'm pretty sure I won't add ownership of /usr/share/locale/mo to literally dozens of packages just so this minor issue is "fixed". I think the filesystem package should create and own it. Surely a symlink from mo to ro would be better so that people

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 30/12/2021 07:02, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 8:19 AM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: I don't see how this is FHS compliant, which in turn would make it non-compliant with Fedora Packaging Guidelines, namely: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guide

Re: F36 Change: Relocate RPM database to /usr (System-Wide Change proposal)

I don't see how this is FHS compliant, which in turn would make it non-compliant with Fedora Packaging Guidelines, namely: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_filesystem_layout The FHS describes /usr here: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04.html#pur

Re: F36 Change: Users are administrators by default in the installer GUI. (Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 06/12/2021 23:53, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/6/21 09:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 12:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:59:05AM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Correct me, if I'm wrong, people to avoid put password in every sudo command, modify sudo to not

Re: cmake on Rawhide is broken

On 03/12/2021 17:48, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 17:25 +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: On 03/12/2021 17:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 03/12/2021 17:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: The bundled openssl in opae worries me still, but that's not causing issues in depen

Re: cmake on Rawhide is broken

On 03/12/2021 17:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 03/12/2021 17:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: The bundled openssl in opae worries me still, but that's not causing issues in dependency resolution any more. I think FESCo should create a strict policy on bundling cryptographic libraries. Wel

Re: Trying to take an orphaned package

On 21/11/2021 13:11, Stephen Snow wrote: And I login with my FAS ID and cannot "Take" the package since I am not a packager. So I ask again what steps am I missing here? I want to take over packaging something that is about to be removed from Fedora Linux since it has been orphaned, I have sign

Re: Trying to take an orphaned package

On 21/11/2021 15:01, Stephen Snow wrote: But actually I think the old wiki version is much more useful in explaining how things work, especially if you're not coming at it from the position of submitting a new package: And it tells me to read a document that doesn't apparently exist anymore.

Re: Trying to take an orphaned package

On 21/11/2021 16:06, Matthew Miller wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:01:00AM -0500, Stephen Snow wrote: Thanks read that back then. But actually I think the old wiki version is much more useful in explaining how things work, especially if you're not coming at it from the position of submittin

Re: openswan/libreswan VPNs and NetworkManager

Fedora also doesn't shop openswan so a plugin wouldn't be very useful. There does seem to be a plasma-nm-strongswan though, but not one for libreswan that I can see. Also NetworkManager's libreswan plugin used to be called openswan up to version 1.0.0 when it was renamed (libreswan is a fork of

Re: Considering ExcludeArch: %{ix86} for webkit2gtk3

On 22/10/2021 00:25, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble building webkit2gtk3-2.34.1 for i686 in rawhide. An example build failure [1] looks like: /usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: lib/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37.55.4: mmap: failed to allocate 2108254132 bytes for output file: Cannot all

Re: protobuf 3.18.1 update coming to rawhide

On 18/10/2021 15:55, Adrian Reber wrote: Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings which breaks the build of: 1. osmpbf Problem: package protobuf-java-3.14.0-6.fc35.noarch conflicts with protobuf-compiler > 3.14.0 provided by protobuf-compiler-3.18.1-1.fc36.x8

Re: leap from f22 to f34 fairytale

On 11/10/2021 13:48, JT wrote: Nice. I did an update from F26-F33 last year doing one version at time instead of jumping more than one version... and had no major issues.  I wonder how far back its possible to start from and walk through the version updates. I recently did F15-F34 though I d

Re: Updating sources file using fedpkg

On 17/06/2021 12:57, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: After that, I'm looking for a command to update the sources file with new checksums so I can run: fedpkg new-sources I could not find such a command so until now I've been using sha512sum manually, but there must be a better way :) We

  1   2   >