Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for hubbitus

. 2020-04-30 01:50, David Schwörer wrote: Hi, Does anybody know how to contact Pavel Alexeev (fas: hubbitus) ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829117 Last comment on the most recent ticket on bugzilla: #1737349 2019-09-08 pahan #1215344 2016-01-01 pahan #1200038 2015-1

Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

Hello On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID

Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416

Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo Could someone please help me solve that problem? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Yes, I'm a fool - I be

Re: Accidentally pushed branch to git

03.12.2016 16:03, Josh Boyer пишет: On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I've just accidentally push into kernel new branch (f25-pf): $ git push originFedora f25-pf WARNING: 'kernel' is an alias for 'rpms/kernel' Counting objects: 2489, done. D

Accidentally pushed branch to git

to be pushed into Fedora repos. I'm very sorry for the mistake. Could please someone delete it? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty, goodness and justice. And also in the f

Re: Patents question about BPG Image format

Thank you. 26.01.2016 22:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:32:22 +0300 Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I found very interesting BPG image format - http://bellard.org/bpg/ Under licensing chapter on offsite stated: * The BPG decoding library uses a modified version of FFmpeg

Patents question about BPG Image format

information). Most devices already include or will include hardware HEVC support, so we suggest to use it if patents are an issue. Licenses free. Licensecheck also show mix of BSD, MIT and LGPL code. But what with codec patents? Is it acceptable in Fedora? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Y

Review swaps

t had been done many-many time ago and I want give it some impulse now. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty, goodness and justice. And also in the fact that I can make this world just a little better unless stop fighting. http://hubbitus.info -

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

Good point. At least for Fedora 24 it will be moved forward now. Thank you. 30.11.2015 12:01, Simone Caronni пишет: On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Pavel Alexeev <mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru>> wrote: And yes, as current version of Remmina has much errors in Fedora 23 I want

Re: Dealing with the "my packages" problem

19.11.2015 14:35, Tomas Mraz пишет: On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 11:06 +0100, Martin Kolman wrote: On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 16:39 -0500, David Airlie wrote: - Original Message - From: "Brian C. Lane" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, 19 November, 2015 7:05:57 AM Subject: Re: Deal

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

features; and I would like to avoid it. Regards, --Simone [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=699433 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=699494 On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Pavel Alexeev <mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru>> wrote: Thanks Neal

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

this email) according to PkgDB[0]. Simone is the one you want to ask, really. [0]: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/guacamole-server/ On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello Neal. If I right understand you are maintainer of guacamole? Do you wish proceed with free

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

Hello Neal. If I right understand you are maintainer of guacamole? Do you wish proceed with freerdp-compat package only? 09.11.2015 13:11, Pavel Alexeev пишет: 08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет: On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. More than half year in

Re: Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

08.11.2015 23:38, Neal Gompa пишет: On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Pavel Alexeev <mailto:fo...@hubbitus.com.ru>>wrote: Hello. More than half year in the past freerdp was updated and then reverted version to current present [1], mostly to allow built guacamole-

Freerdp update with bundle in guacamole-server

best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty, goodness and justice. And also in the fact that I can make this world just a little better unless stop fighting. http://hubbitus.info -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: plowshare is not shipped with modules anymore

17.04.2015 07:41, Ralf Corsepius пишет: > On 04/17/2015 01:10 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: >> Hi >> >> 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет: >>> On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote: >>> >>>> Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uplo

Re: plowshare is not shipped with modules anymore

Hi 14.04.2015 05:20, Ralf Corsepius пишет: > On 04/14/2015 03:01 AM, Elder Marco wrote: > >> Ralf, plowshare is a command-line downloader/uploader for some of the >> most popular file-sharing websites. Each module (written in bash) >> corresponds to a different sharing site. The modules are down

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have >> worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass >> rebuild? It allow estimat

Re: FreeRDP downgrade in rawhide and f22 updates-testing

Hello. 18.03.2015 14:08, David Woodhouse wrote: > After a brief flirtation with a FreeRDP 1.2.1-beta snapshot, we > concluded that the API breakage was too much to handle and we've > reverted to a slightly earlier snapshot of 1.2.0-beta. > > The 1.2.1 packages were briefly visible in rawhide and f2

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

ad of F22 testing. The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see dependencies. Do we have resources to do so? -- With best wishes, Pavel A

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > Rich Mattes wrote: > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >> >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rath

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

Hello. 06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. >>>>

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

Hello. ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. 05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in >> rawhide in 1-3 days. > <

ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

owners in cc. Please let me known if you wish me to rebuild your package. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9139666 [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087263 -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use

Re: What exactly is a "bundled library"? (was Re: apitrace, bundled libbacktrace)

ng:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries (as it explicitly states > "whether or not they are packaged separately for Fedora"). This could > have considerable implementations for webapps if it were interpreted > strictly, I think. Sorry for the old thread. But it is very interesting question to clearly determine "bundled library" to which returning happened again and again. Does it hang again now or something indeed changed? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21

ckage(co)maintainers > === … > pmountorphan, agk, Took master, f19, а20. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me

Re: ORPHAN of mysql and python stuff

02.06.2014 12:15, Remi Collet пишет: > Le 28/05/2014 18:32, Pavel Alexeev a écrit : >>> mysql-connector-python (1.1.6 in rawhide, 1.2.1 recently released) > Orphaned. > >>> mysql-utilities (1.3.6 in rawhide, 1.4.3 recently released) > Orphaned >> Looks intere

Re: What happened to xlwt?

Hi. According to pkgdb - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xlwt/ it has been orphaned. 30.05.2014 15:55, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > pkgdb knows a package called xlwt, but there is no repository for it. > What happened to it? > > Regards > Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: ORPHAN of mysql and python stuff

ariadb compatible I could take it. Do you have current problems with it? > > If you want to take them, just ask, I will release ownership. > > > Remi. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list

Re: rawhide report: 20140523 changes

23.05.2014 14:40, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Broken deps for i386 > -- > > [redeclipse] > redeclipse-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2 > redeclipse-server-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2 > [remmina] > remmina-1.

Re: rawhide report: 20140523 changes

23.05.2014 14:40, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Broken deps for i386 > -- > > [redeclipse] > redeclipse-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2 > redeclipse-server-1.4-6.fc20.i686 requires libenet.so.2 > [remmina] > remmina-1.

Re: [Owner-change] Fedora packages ownership change

05.05.2014 14:00, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Change in ownership over the last 168 hours > === > > 4 packages were orphaned > > transfig [devel,f19,f20] was orphaned by kdudka > A utility for converting FIG files (made by

Re: ImageMagick 6.8.8-10 in rawhide. Soname change.

10.04.2014 05:25, Sérgio Basto пишет: > On Qui, 2014-04-10 at 01:40 +0200, Tadej Janež wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 18:30 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: >>> Packages for rebuild: >>> $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps Im

ImageMagick 6.8.8-10 in rawhide. Soname change.

.fc21.i686 vips-devel-0:7.38.5-2.fc21.x86_64 vips-python-0:7.38.5-2.fc21.x86_64 vips-tools-0:7.38.5-2.fc21.x86_64 w3m-img-0:0.5.3-14.fc21.x86_64 -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fe

Re: ImageMagick 6.8.8-10 in rawhide. Soname change.

Hi 08.04.2014 20:12, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:30:25 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Dependency rebuild needed. If you are willing I'll rebuild all after 3 >> days if you do not answer I should not do it. >> Packages for rebuild: &g

Re: Review Swap

Hello, Christopher. I'll review it. 09.02.2014 17:40, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a program which can check your system based on the open public > CVE data, a bit like lynis, is another auditing utility. > > I hope someone can review it: > > cvechecker > > https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: orphan/retire gradle

26.11.2013 20:00, punto...@libero.it пишет: > Il 26/11/2013 16:42, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: >> 26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote: >>> Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: >>>> 25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>>>>

Re: orphan/retire gradle

26.11.2013 15:06, punto...@libero.it wrote: > Il 26/11/2013 11:34, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: >> 25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >>> W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze: >>>> How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?

Re: orphan/retire gradle

25.11.2013 22:45, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze: >> How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon? > No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with > Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first op

Re: orphan/retire gradle

25.11.2013 20:32, punto...@libero.it пишет: > Il 25/11/2013 17:02, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> 25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote: >>> Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: >>> hi >>>> Hi. >>>> I'm a

Re: orphan/retire gradle

Hi, 25.11.2013 17:31, punto...@libero.it wrote: > Il 25/11/2013 13:55, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > hi >> Hi. >> I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it. >> Have you tried update to gradle 1.9? > no >> Have it same conflicts? >> &

Re: orphan/retire gradle

Hi. I'm as groovy user want see it in Fedora. And now try build it. Have you tried update to gradle 1.9? Have it same conflicts? 12.11.2013 19:58, punto...@libero.it wrote: > hi > i decide to remove gradle form Fedora > there are too many problems actually for maintain this package > incompatible

Re: Source file audit - 2013-09-30

04.10.2013 01:35, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. > Please fix any packages you are responsible for in rawhide, and other > branches as other changes permit. > > - There are 3067 lines in this run. Up from 1007 last run. > (Which was 2.5 years a

Re: Graphics driver support in F21+

haven't bothered with the embedded video adapter on them, so I cannot > speak to their suitability for running Fedora 19. I have old desktop installation with matrox-mga driver used. Is it will only single VESA driver choose which do smaller resolution for that? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alex

Orphaning ne7ssh

With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Update uniconvertor to 2.0

=759747 [4] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923581 -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: Overall rawhide package testing.

Hi. 26.08.2013 16:19, Alec Leamas wrote: > As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in > current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are > reports on issues by package and packages by issue. May be it could be possible list it by packager? I want check my

Re: Release packages ownership

24.08.2013 00:35, Fabien Nicoleau пишет: > Hi, > > due to a lack of time, I released the ownership of most of my packages : > > cclive > > -- > Command line video extraction utility > cli

Re: orphaning of packages

16.08.2013 12:12, Robin Lee wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Dennis Gilmore mailto:den...@ausil.us>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Jima has not been able to make enough time for Fedora lately and asked > me to orphan and announce the packages he maintains. > > alsa-oss > aoetools > banner

Retire pdfbook

That is obsoleted by texlive-pdfjam-3:svn29752.2.02-0.5.fc20.noarch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999211 I'll proceed if no any argue in 1 hour. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://

Re: httpd-itk broken over release because httpd updated without dependencies caring and maintainer refuse fixing

Thank you. I have done it - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1125. 16.06.2013 18:55, Kalev Lember wrote: > 2013-06-16 16:47, Pavel Alexeev skrev: > [snip] >> So, is there any chance to force apply these patches (as provenpackager >> I can do it itself)? Or I only may wait n

httpd-itk broken over release because httpd updated without dependencies caring and maintainer refuse fixing

d=479575 [3] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597772 -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20130330 changes

. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: I'm willing unorphan dead python-chm

31.03.2013 20:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:10:47 +0400 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Kevin thank you for the fast answer. > No problem. > > ...snip... > >> In pkgbd devel and Fedora 19 branches marked as Deprecated in status

Re: I'm willing unorphan dead python-chm

Kevin thank you for the fast answer. 30.03.2013 23:07, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:22:25 +0400 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Hello all. >> >> It is needed for chm2pdf which maintainer I became. > It's also needed by archmage p

I'm willing unorphan dead python-chm

Hello all. It is needed for chm2pdf which maintainer I became. As I see there had not big problem with it. It was orphaned 2013-03-11 according to dead.package file. Around 2 weeks ago and I missed that. So by [1] I hope I can resurrect it without re-review. But second step is not so clear to

Re: Self introduction

Welcome. You could start here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group 16.03.2013 23:14, Niyo Raoul wrote: Greetings, I am a system engineer at ORINUX BURUNDI. I am not experienced in big development project. But i love programming and design. However, i

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

14.03.2013 12:17, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-magickwand Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch) Thanks. It built too - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5134893 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Patch incorporated, thanks again. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

17.03.2013 16:40, Rex Dieter пишет: Pavel Alexeev wrote: 17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probabl

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

ora. Will need to work on a fix... Could you do that? I think then I should wait until that happened before IM landed to rawhide, is not? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fe

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Thanks for pointing. Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraprojec

ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

scape k3d kxstitch libdmtx nip2 oxine pfstools php-magickwand php-pecl-imagick psiconv q rss-glx ruby-RMagick spectrum techne transcode vips xastir xine-lib zbar -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- deve

Re: the need of "Offline Updates"

05.02.2013 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.02.2013 16:49, schrieb Jochen Schmitt: On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 10:30:50AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: 2) Modern Windows updates are safer than RPM, speaking broadly jokingly? show me a upgrade of production machines from F9 to F17 without end in

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

04.02.2013 13:28, Petr Šabata пишет: On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:14:48AM +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: On 3 February 2013 17:20, Pavel wrote: I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel. I have released the ownership. You can claim them. Thank you. I've taken dvtm as I've been more or less mainta

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

04.02.2013 10:47, Kevin Kofler wrote: Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/ApacheOpenOffice = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora. A big -1 to this feature, and in fact I'd urge

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

04.02.2013 11:38, Kevin Kofler wrote: David Tardon wrote: Hi, On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said: My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to keep backwards maintainability. Personally I say both pa

Re: Releasing ownership

03.02.2013 21:48, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:32:58 +0400 Pavel Alexeev wrote: 29.01.2013 10:59, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote: I am releasing ownership of the following packages due to lack of time chm2pdf -- A tool to convert CHM files to PDF files I have taken this

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

01.02.2013 17:38, Matej Cepl wrote: On 2013-01-31, 22:07 GMT, Chris Adams wrote: I'm not saying having both is a bad thing, but I would like to think that there's some thought given to "does Fedora gain from having both", since there is a cost involved. We don’t (unfortunately?) have policy to

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

01.02.2013 00:17, drago01 wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote: I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example. LibreOffice was i

Re: using rpms for non-root installs

Hello. Yum also may be used with --installroot=root I have used yum and rpm on that kind with aliases for current user to install software from repositories on shared hosting absolutely without root privileges. In most cases it works, except some cases when particular binaries looks say own

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Replace MySQL with MariaDB

01.02.2013 00:42, James Hogarth wrote: Is it? http://blog.mariadb.org/explanation-on-mariadb-10-0/ and http://blog.mariadb.org/mariadb-10-0-and-mysql-5-6/ seem to suggest that MariaDB will no longer be following Mysql as religiously as the feature suggests I'd still say y

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

I would like take dvtm and pstreams-devel. 29.01.2013 05:37, Rakesh Pandit wrote: Hi, I haven't been able to keep up maintenance of packages for year plus now and I don't see myself doing that for next 6-7months more. Right now I am too busy with university course work. But I will come back an

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

29.01.2013 06:51, Richard Shaw wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: tinyxml -- A simple, small, C++ XML parser I've requested this one in pkgdb. It is interesting and small library and there I found tends to bundle it in other packages which is not listed as exception:

Re: Releasing ownership

s for extracting information from XCF files xcftools not orphaned. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Fedora Upgrade - using yum

y amount of updated packages which "suggest reboot" for user. And I may himself plan reboot when I want... -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Fedora Members Absent or present?

20.01.2013 16:14, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Frank Murphy [20/01/2013 11:43] : Is there any definitive way to determine if person X has left the Fedoraproject as a whole? The closest thing we have to a definitive way is pingou's fedora_active_user script. https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-activ

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

07.06.2012 12:52, Tadej Janež написал: On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 21:27 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: With regard to the packages that depend on ImageMagick that you already updated: will you revert those commits in git I'm unsure I known how doing that correctly. Does it enough do just: git r

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

06.06.2012 03:09, Tadej Janež написал: On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:55 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I'll plan unpush that update and work on patching ImageMagick to handle these issues locally. But I'm not security expert and can't guarantee something except mentioned patch apply (co

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

05.06.2012 16:09, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:05:13 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал: On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about provenpackager and such updates

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал: On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such versions. It's not provenpackager specific stuff, but fou

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

04.06.2012 21:11, Pete Walter написал: Pavel Alexeev hubbitus.com.ru> writes: May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that update? Do you try test it? No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this shouldn't be pushed: - You are f

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

04.06.2012 20:10, Pete Walter wrote: Pavel Alexeev hubbitus.com.ru> writes: If you or other will insist I may unpush that update and try patch IM for all issues off course... But I really do not want doing it now. In my opinion, the right way to handle this is to backport the security fi

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

03.06.2012 22:57, Tadej Janež wrote: Pavel, On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and then ask help to push updates too. I think in that turn

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

28.05.2012 16:45, Tomáš Smetana wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2012 23:28:03 +0400 Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hi. Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should had been done it early off course). It seams address

Re: Easy way of testing packages?

Something similar already was requested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563285 Please look there also for some mentioned alternatives in comments. 02.06.2012 17:40, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: Hi all, is there an easy way to test packages except of using $ yum --enablerep

Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16

28.05.2012 16:23, Kalev Lember wrote: On 05/27/2012 10:28 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hi. Due to the security issues ([1] for example) and act as newcomer provenpackager I'll plan update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 too (I should had been done it early off course). It seams addressed in rawhide

Re: RealHotspot availability

20.05.2012 04:32, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2012-05-18 at 21:49 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: On 05/18/2012 09:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot has been approved for Fedora 1

Re: New libtiff version in rawhide, requires dependent packages rebuild

06.05.2012 20:10, Tom Lane wrote: I have pushed libtiff 4.0.1 into rawhide, replacing libtiff 3.9.5. This entails a library soname bump and a few small source-level incompatibilities, as detailed at http://www.remotesensing.org/libtiff/v4.0.0.html By my count there are about a hundred dependent

Re: F16->F17 preupgrade (Re: F17 Beta to slip by an additional week.)

29.04.2012 15:00, Ian Malone wrote: On 29 April 2012 01:05, Richard Vickery wrote: On 2012-04-26 10:50 AM, "Michał Piotrowski" wrote: Hi, W dniu 9 kwietnia 2012 17:46 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: Hi, Is it possible to upgrade now from F16 to F17 with preupgrade? Has anyone tr

Re: node.js rpm and looking for an sponsor

Then delete it in %prep or %setup to be sure. 22.04.2012 18:07, Adrian Alves wrote: check my spec i dont use a bundle, check how i built it On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Michael Scherer > wrote: Le dimanche 22 avril 2012 à 10:53 -0300, Adrian Alves a écrit :

Re: While we're talking about RPM dependencies ...

16.04.2012 09:33, Toshio Kuratomi написал: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 16.04.2012 00:51, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: As I look it for me for first glance. Install or update one package scenario (yum

Re: While we're talking about RPM dependencies ...

16.04.2012 00:51, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:16:58PM +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: As I look it for me for first glance. Install or update one package scenario (yum install foo): 1) Client ask last foo package version. 2) Server calculate all dependencies by self algorithms

Re: While we're talking about RPM dependencies ...

14.04.2012 20:44, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:21:15PM +0200, drago01 wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I'm not arguing that's how yum works now, but it doesn't have to work that way! It could

Update ImageMagick to 6.7.6-5 in rawhide to fix several security issues

Hello. I've plan update ImageMagick in rawhide. No major changes or ABI breakage awaited. Rebuild needed only for packages explicitly depends on IM version (at least ruby-RMagick). Scratch build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3977251 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: ImageMagick - [Fedora Update] [comment] xine-lib-1.1.20.1-3.fc17, emacs-24.0.94-3.fc17, calibre-0.8.42-1.fc17, perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17, techne-0.2.1-4.fc17, gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17, autotrace

06.04.2012 19:43, Michael Schwendt написал: On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:57:14 +0200, CF (Christophe) wrote: On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:27:31AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: Suggestions? I'm tempted to pushed this to stable so that broken deps emails start going out to get people to do the needed re

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 21:31, Adam Williamson написал: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:42 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion

  1   2   >