06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > Rich Mattes <richmat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >> >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather >> than later as rawhide is currently a big game of whack-a-mole when >> building c++ packages. > As soon as gcc folks say things are settled down enough to do one, we > can look at scheduling one. ;) > > It would be a shame to do it too soon though and have a bug requiring > another one. > > I've been rebuilding things as I run into them being broken. > (The other day it was the gobby stack: net6, libxml++, obby, gobby). Is it ok to rebuild all dependencies f.e. for fix build issue with pfstools introduced by that update? Or just fill bugzilla issues for owners? > > kevin > >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
