On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:59 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> >
> > > ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath:
> > >
> > > > Lots of people
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath:
>
> > Lots of people use and share keys across different projects.
>
> There is no security issue in sharing kes across different projects,
> other than that it gives a str
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:41 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:30:19 -0400
> > Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > I have a question not covered here: I just changed my ssh key a week
> > > or two ago in the wake of the kernel.org compromise...
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > 2011/
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:42 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I've seen some reports of F15 not working in Virtualbox. There's a few
> > notes online about possible fixes. Is there some way we can better test
> > this in
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
> have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
> pretty nasty.
>
This should do it:
rsync -az --progress -e ssh fedorapeople.org:/srv/repos/ /your/path
You
I've seen some reports of F15 not working in Virtualbox. There's a few
notes online about possible fixes. Is there some way we can better test
this in the future (I'm thinking about QA but that might not be the right
place).
Smolt has virtualbox rated as pretty common:
http://smolts.org/static/
Hey all, I'm doing a horrible horrible job of maintaining my packagegs,
some of which people actually use. Please pick up what you can if you're
interested. Here's the list:
cacti
perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5
perl-Date-Pcalc
perl-File-RsyncP
perl-MIME-Lite
perl-SOAP-Lite
phpMyAdmin (robert's been an exc
Hey everyone, just a heads up. Looks like sourceforge was attacked.
Details are still on the way but please do pay extra careful attention
when downloading and updating your packages, verify whatever checksums you
can, etc.
http://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/sourceforge/2011/01/27/service-down
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> * Can we finally remove hal? (xfce4.8 shouldn't need it anymore with
> any luck).
>
Current HEAD of smolt doesn't require it, expecting to release to rawhide
soon.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On 10/19/2010 11:25 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:22 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, So when this was broken a lot of bugs were triggered?
> >>>
> >>> Sure seems like if a lot of bugs are being triggered then it i
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> >
> >As the subject says.
> >
> >The yubikey still works fine for logging to FAS at
> >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
> >
> >My regular FAS password works fine at
> >https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/
> >
>
There will be an outage starting at 2010-10-16 00:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-10-16 00:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Converting our postgres (db2) server
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to
> > illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and
> > overall value add before we dive head f
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
> to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
>
> If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
> Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just h
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2010-10-07 07:25:47 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > I have one and I've played with it in fedora. There is however an
> > > important
> > > catch. The server and the yubikey share the same AES symmetr
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> >>> We also decided to allow yubikeys as an authentication option for the
> >>> larger community to some hosts and services like fedorapeople.org or
> >>> https://admin
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:04:49 -0500,
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > We also decided to allow yubikeys as an authentication option for the
> > larger community to some hosts and services like fedorapeople.org or
> > h
The Fedora Infrastructure team is happy to announce support for the
hardware key authentication device, the yubikey. Users will be able to
use their own yubikeys to access some Fedora services, like
fedorapeople.org or some web services.
Why have we done this? The main purpose was to provide mu
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > One issue - many people have a mix of systems not all 64 bit capable. As
> > long as the advantages are not overwhelming many of those will stick to a
> > single variant for practical reasons and obviously that can only be 32
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The Fedora web resources (e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora )
> continue to promote i686 installs over x86_64, the result being that
> only a third of fedora users are on x86_64.
>
> When will the Fedora project begin recommending x86_64 as the
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > > Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descripti
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as session daemon in DEs ev
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to
> request a build, does not support proxies.
>
> In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with an
> increasingly paranoid IT group in charge of the fire
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was under the impression that
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/
> was the replacement for the old cvsweb viewer for Fedora packages.
> However, so far as I can tell in some quick looking around, this
> server is showing month-old data. It isn't reflec
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 00:45:49 -0400,
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > So far the only brokeness I have had in all of F13 is with `seabios-bin`.
>
> Wasn't there recently a packagekit problem where it stopped doing updates,
> making it kind of ha
The short version (as paraphrased by tibbs):
20:01 < tibbs|h> nss-3.12.6-7 doesn't work, 3.12.6-12 works.
The longer version: A recent update to fas included an upgrade of the OS
to the RHEL6 alpha. One unintended consequence of this is we're now
generating pkcs#8 keys instead of rsa. This cau
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > We wish we weren't and we want to learn from our mistakes rather than
> > repeat them. In the case of the start page I believe it was a
> > concession combined with the hope that it would be replaced with a
> > free solution in the future. It at the ve
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/29 Gerard Braad
> > dead
>
> It would be more appropriate to have this discussion to take place on
> openetherpad.org instead of Google Wave. As at least everyone can
> participate instead of these few with wave acco
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/28/2010 09:40 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Dennis is his backup (RH employee) and if need be I know jwb (not redhat
> > employee) is more than capable of handling these problems. Believe it or
> > not,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/28/2010 08:28 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > What are you afraid of?
>
> I think my concerns have been very clear.
>
> > Fedora is not a country, you don't have to move to get away. All the code
> > is free. Most the code isn't even ou
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 15:23 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > >Again, I feel it is necessary to have a survey of Fedora users.
> > >Preferably annually. And listen to the feedback. If they say "yep, we
> > >just love the churn, the number of updates" and s
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is
> > declining. What we can prove, and certainly is troublesome, is that
> > yum check-ins of successive releases have been droppi
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > When there's a compelling use case for NetworkManager on machines that
> > don't move around?
>
> The "compelling use case" is that it doesn't make sense to maintain 2 pieces
> of core infrastructure code doing the same thing, es
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:46:41PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
> > for workstation most users already use ubuntu. why? because it's more
> > user friendly.
>
> There is nothing wrong with using Ubuntu, if it servers their needs.
>
> > do you think worksta
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:10 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > People like you and me would opt-in. (well I would on some hosts) because
> > we know what we're doing. Expert eyes get a look at it before it's forced
> &g
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 11:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > > GENERAL SANITY
> > > > - Booting a system shall achieve a similar result as booting in upstart:
> > > > -- The same se
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:52 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> >> It's just risk management. I think we'd be better off acknowledging there
> >> are unknown unknowns and try to
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 16:39, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 23.08.10 16:22, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 16:22, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > (yet another thing we ignored in this process). My experience has so far
> > been very bad with systemd so when Lennart proclaims that everything's
&g
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) said:
> > > My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to quantify
> > > the unknown unknown, and define a time period of testing which is
> > > 'long
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
> > So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the
> > only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I
> > don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are o
There was an unexpected outage starting at 2010-08-23 17:57 UTC, which
lasted about 20 minutes
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-08-23 17:57 UTC'
Reason for outage:
hosted01 died. Root cause still unkn
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:38 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> >
> > And change it. The request was pretty clear.
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Try to stay friendly, maybe ?
> Lennart said at the outset that he was open to
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 10:52, Garrett Holmstrom (gho...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
>
> >
> > Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > So, to turn this around. Do you think this behaviour is problematic? Can
> > > you make a good case for dropping this automatism? I
Obligatory "Why does X run as root since it doesn't have to?" thread given
the exploit re-announcement.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 08/16/2010 02:06 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/12/2010 02:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 02:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >
> >>>>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham writes:
> >>
> >> BN> I can't help but note
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:49:42 -0600,
> "Nathanael D. Noblet" wrote:
> >
> > Since the move to git, would it not be easier to allow features to
> > branch rawhide, get their individual bits together (syncing with 'trunk'
> > periodically)... Then
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:48:56AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > Do you like fixing things but don't care what?
>
> Hello,
>
> may I ask you about FES workflow? Should FES members (with
> provenpackager perms, for example) pus
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'll admit, this is a convenient view to have. The problem is we're not
> > in high school anymore. We're professionals. We're expected to set and
> > keep schedules because people
Do you like fixing things but don't care what?
Are you a jack of all trades sort of person?
We need your help!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services:Join
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Thursday, August 12, 2010 09:33:17 pm Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 12.08.10 13:19, Mike McGrath (mmcgr...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > Since 2006 I counted 18 slips (I think one or two of those may just be a
> > &g
There will be an outage starting at 2010-08-15 01:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-08-15 01:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Network work is being done in our pr
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
> > > This is a collective failure.
> >
> > I'd like to question that premise. Why is it a failure if we adjust our
> > release schedule to meet our release criteria ?
>
> Well, ideally we'd be able to sched
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "BN" == Bill Nottingham writes:
>
> BN> I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we
> BN> started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We
> BN> didn't slip nearly as much when we weren't testing it.
Oct 6 2006: "Fedora Core 6 release date slip" -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2006-October/002243.html
Oct 16 2006: "Another slip in the FC6 schedule" -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2006-October/002248.html
Jul 11 2006: "FC6 test2 freeze slipping by a week
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > All your packages are now orphaned.
> >
> > Thanks for letting us know.
>
> Do we have a list of the packages that got orphaned? Unfortunately, querying
> pkgdb doesn't help anymore now that you set the stuff to orphaned.
>
Luckily
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the prope
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > > Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry,
> > > one has to download https://admin.fed
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:11:24PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:03:14 +0200
> > Till Maas wrote:
>
> > > The attack is quite trivial:
> > > 1) clone the git pkg Fedora repos
> > > 2) commit some nasty change
> > > 3) publish the repo
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> I think it because name of package contain plus sign:
>
> $ fedpkg -v clone "DivFix++"
> Cloning ssh://hubbi...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/DivFix++
> Running git clone ssh://hubbi...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/DivFix++
> directly on the tty
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> - "Carl G." wrote:
> > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
> > you can get "real work" done. /s
> >
> > Let me know if you need some help to
> > make the stats looks pretty.
>
> Thank You Carl, this will help the community a lot and is a p
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
> >
> > $ fedpkg co vtk
> > Cloning into vtk...
> > Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
>
> $ fedpkg co vtk
> Cloning into vtk...
> Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
> open log failed: Permission denied
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> Co
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
> > > already ...
> > >
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
> Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
> already ...
>
> My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
> an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
> ie about three hours ago.
>
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mark Rader wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a
> couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors.
>
> [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
> Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/fra
Sorry, it was owned by packagers, I've changed that.
-Mike
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Gerard Braad wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
> > -Mike
I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location
to store packages that users might find interesting.
It's still a bit manual (but coprs should fix that). When the time comes
we'll be able to properly mirror
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
> > Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 12:41 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> >
> > Uhh... Firefox 4 GA is before F14 even goes into GA stage. So, that
> > isn't true. Firefox 4 could be i
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jacks
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> &
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 12:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Any particular reason we are using gitweb at
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/. Cgit is used in freedesktop.org
> > is much more faster and resource efficient.
>
> With my fd
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> Maybe baby steps? Small incremental changes. Sure some features will be
> missing that kopers will provide. But perhaps we could just create a
> Fedora-13-devel tag in koji, push it to it's own repo or to individual
> fedora
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> >> >
>
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 02:25 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >&g
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 01:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:37 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 03:04:46PM +0200, Florent Le Coz wrote:
> >>> On 28/07/2010 14:52, Mike McGra
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Florent Le Coz wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 00:24, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> > F11 or F12 had a beta version of firefox
> >
> > spot's chromium builds do support webm, it works great :)
> >
> >
> It's still not included in fedora's repositories, so it doesn't change
> anything.
> Fir
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Filipe Rosset wrote:
> Em 27-07-2010 18:53, Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> > schedule. There are dozens of new features incl
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 10:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are we skipping Firefox 4 for Fedora 14? Beta 2 has been released
> > recently and I am wondering if we can go with it if it fits into the
> > schedule. There are dozens of new features i
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:49:50 +0200
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > 1. Parallelization: we can completely get rid of any serialization of
> > startup. We can start *every* signle daemon at the same time in one
> > big step, regardless whether one of them
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 20:02 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm planning to do a partial mass-rebuild for Python 2.7.
> >
> > This would cover all Python 2 users within the distribution, roughly
> > 1000 src.rpms.
> >
> > Some notes can be seen at:
> > h
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > I think the bigger question is why are we doing this?
>
> There's some motivation here:
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
>
I was pretty clear
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 21.07.10 13:29, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote:
>
> > Once upon a time, drago01 said:
> > > And when I say/here admin I'd expect to be talking about a human (not
> > > some kind of robot that has hardwired commands and can't adapt t
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 04:47:38PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > There will be an outage starting at 2010-07-21 16:00 UTC, which will
> > last approximately 3 hours. Outages will be small but noticeable for
> > small segments as systems are upda
There is an ongoing outage at this time in PHX2. The exact start time is
not yet known and the ETA to be fixed is not yet known.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-07-05 01:00'
Reason for outage:
Severa
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>>On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> It's seems to me tha
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-22 21:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 2.5 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-22 21:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Work is being done on buzilla's da
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-13 00:30 UTC, which will last
approximately 6 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-13 00:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Network work and testing will be goi
There will be an outage starting at 2010-06-04 14:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-06-04 14:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Updating some vpn settings. I hope
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 05/16/2010 11:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > And it causes a load of obscure Koji-specific bugs which require
> > workarounds just for Koji builds. This was the latest one:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-de...@nongnu.org/msg252
Hello all, I just sent an email to several of you with the F12->F13
updates list. I included f13-updates-testing but forgot f13-updates so
some of those in the list were false positives. Below is an updated
list. Sorry about that.
greater for f12: PyYAML (jeckersb)
f12 = PyYAML-3.09-5.fc12.sr
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Em 12-05-2010 14:37, Frank Murphy escreveu:
> > On 12/05/10 18:31, Clovis Tristao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I want to upgrade to Fedora F12->F13 but the first time I tried I had
> >> this error:
> >>
> >> Not enough space in /boot/
On Sun, 9 May 2010, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:07 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 20:34:57 +0300,
> > Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > > Thus far, it seemed that the both the user and the developer communities
> > > were left out of these proceedings, and
There was an outage starting at 2010-05-04 22:13 UTC, which lasted
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-05-04 22:13 UTC'
Reason for outage:
While trying to recover from this last major
Here's a list of f12 -> f13 with unclean update paths based on srpm.
I'll work with FES to to go through and get some builds out. Some might
make it in to F13 final, some will go out as F13-updates.
greater for f12: rawtherapee
f12 = rawtherapee-3.0-0.20.a1.fc12.src
f13 = rawtherapee-3.0-0.18.a
There will be an outage starting at 2010-04-29 03:50:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-29 03:50:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
Total power loss to the prima
There was an outage starting at 2010-04-25 14:30 UTC, which lasted
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2010-04-25 14:30 UTC'
Reason for outage:
db3, koji's primary database, was throwing r
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
