Re: Non-responsive maintainer rdieter

2025-05-24 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Saturday, 24 May 2025 13:17:14 Central European Summer Time Leigh Scott wrote: > Did you try the email address listed on his github user page? No, I did not. I only used the registered email on fedora. I will try there. Thanks for the tip! Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí Sys

Non-responsive maintainer rdieter

2025-05-24 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
linking to any specific bug report because Rex is essentially assigned to _all_ kdesig packages. Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

2025-04-24 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
, I agree with the request to bring the X11 Gnome session as removing it should have been part of a change proposal. Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

2025-04-24 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
kwin-x11 and plasma-workspace-x11 separately" and you would have conveyed all the information that was needed. Everything else is uncalled for. -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-08 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
here is no data to begin with... all those risks don't exist -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-08 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
gal != what is right (and I am not saying anybody here is right or wrong, I am just making a point) -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
Regardless, that is a very weak argument. The fact that some information might be leaked while browsing the web has absolutely no weight on whether I would like to see even *more* data from Fedora users collected by yet another entity (not matter how well intended) -- Marc Deop i Ar

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
n an engineers view, there is more at stake here. -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://doc

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
-07-07 this proposal has not been accepted. Discussing whether the projects fails or not is not something that we should do because it would "ingrain" in our brains the idea that it has been accepted. And it hasn't ;-) Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- _

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-06 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
y default. Most users will just click on "Yes" without really comprehending what they are doing. And you _know_ this. -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Anaconda as native Wayland application (System Wide)

2024-06-11 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday 11 June 2024 14:52:19 CEST Sérgio Basto wrote: I had enough with you an your attitude. You have been abusing the good will and temperament of many Fedora contributors for too long. Somebody must put a stop to your comments and behavior. > If you can't support X11 together with Waylan

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-03 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday, 3 April 2024 01:48:47 CEST Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:06:45PM -0400, Steve Cossette wrote: > > Alright, so a substantial amount of information changed since the original > > submission of the change proposal. We aren't necessarily thinking of > > demoting Gnome. T

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-10 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Saturday, 10 February 2024 01:11:03 CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > By the way, what that link does not mention when it talks about "multiple > packages for the same thing" is browsers / web engines. The Spin ships > several applications using QtWebEngine, e.g., KMail, so that engine is not

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-09 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 9 February 2024 11:53:01 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > so you agree that are giving the overhead to us (the people who want > keep X11 as it is ) Yes!!! OF COURSE! If you wanna maintain something you need to handle the overhead! Not the other way around! -- __

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-09 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 9 February 2024 04:15:17 CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Well, then kwin-x11 will also no longer depend on kwin YE > and your argument > that it is a problem because it introduces a hard version lock will be moot. Well, there would be no argument to be "moot" because there wo

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-08 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday, 8 February 2024 20:21:19 CET Roy Bekken wrote: > You mean the proposal from kde-sig that they wanted changing to plasma 6 and > dropping X11 because they have no interest of supporting it? > Yes. Interest *and* resources. > Don’t see why that should prevent someone else from support

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-08 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday, 8 February 2024 12:33:29 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > you are removing X11 from the builds deliberately , Yes. And the moment this: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kwin/-/issues/139 gets implemented we will not have to remove anything. (remember that the Change Proposal was approved) >

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday, 7 February 2024 13:21:15 CET Peter Boy wrote: > If KDE Sig wants to attract users to Wayland, then the only good strategy is > to make Wayland better than the previous way (i.e. Xorg) and promote that > fact actively. Does something make you think that we do not? > Simply banning o

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Sunday, 4 February 2024 03:55:42 CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > We (the KDE SIG and me) stopped being Friends when you (the KDE SIG) > unilaterally decided to ban me from all your communication channels, a ban > that has still not been lifted years after the alleged misconduct (on IRC > o

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 2 February 2024 00:38:56 CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > To make it clear about the situation of that particular package: The KDE SIG > never notifies me in advance about kdepim bumps. To make it clear about this particular package: - we have _forgotten_ indeed to notify the mainta

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 2 February 2024 00:49:19 CET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > This can be solved with communication. > That is dealing with the situation your packages would cause, not solving it. ( I don't mean ill will, it just a statement) > That said, if the KDE SIG does not want to have to coor

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday, 7 February 2024 05:07:28 CET Garry T. Williams wrote: > I went to compose an E-mail message using kmail and its composer > window and noticed it was broken.[*] I couldn't even find a bug > report about this. I fear it's because many others just ignored the > various bugs and went ba

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Saturday, 3 February 2024 17:52:42 CET Adam Williamson wrote: > Why? This is the part I don't understand. Can you explain it in more > detail? Thanks. If we update plasma-workspace and kwin we are likely gonna break binary compatibility with the proposed packages. They will need to be rebuilt

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-02-03 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 2 February 2024 20:56:22 CET Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > regarding tracking (and taking) bugs, and > lack of timely updates, for something as > visible as the entire desktop. Here you are highlighting some of my (I speak for me, not the KDE SIG) main concerns: - If a user decided to inst

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-01-30 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 15:57:12 CET Steven A. Falco wrote: > I'm delighted that there are like-minded folks who want to maintain X11. > Please allow them to do so. I will just quote you what Stephen said: > This is > misleading, as the move to Wayland is specifically because the > upstream

Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

2024-01-30 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 14:04:29 CET Germano Massullo wrote: > What does it mean that FESCo is applying an injunction? Only that the packages in question are "on hold" until a decision can be taken. The word sounds way worse than what it really is. -- ___

Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers

2023-10-28 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Saturday, 28 October 2023 11:59:55 CEST Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > * f40-build-side-76474 > > * f39-build-side-76476 > > * f38-build-side-76478 > > > > > I will take care of this today (2023-10-28) Powerdevil has been rebui

Re: Second call for rebuilding powerdevil and call for help from provenpackagers

2023-10-28 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday, 26 October 2023 22:57:28 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote: > Hi all, > > It is nearly a full month since last mail. And seems that koji has > recycled the side tags due to inactivity. I re-created them: > > * f40-build-side-76474 > * f39-build-side-76476 > * f38-build-side-76478 > > Seems

Testing Release Upgrades via Discover

2023-04-09 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
e.org/plasma/discover/-/merge_requests/500 [4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig/discover-distro-upgrade/ [5] https://blog.marcdeop.com/?p=267 [6] https://matrix.to/#/#kde:fedoraproject.org Best regards, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Eng

Re: Unannounced .so version bump (F38/F39): openexr2

2023-02-23 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday, 23 February 2023 09:48:36 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > - kde-runtime > > - kdebase3 > > - kdelibs I created a side-tag: f39-build-side-63924 and rebuilt kdelibs and kde- runtime. However, it turns out I don't have commit access to kdebase3. I subm

Re: Unannounced .so version bump (F38/F39): openexr2

2023-02-23 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
he needed packages there? Thanks, -- Marc Deop i Argemí System Engineer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.o

Re: libindi upgrade to 2.0.0 and soname bump

2023-02-14 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 19:13:39 CET Mattia Verga wrote: > To the kstars maintainers: I can take care to upgrade the package, if > you want (it's just a simple version bump and upload new sources). > > To the stellarium maintainers: I will wait for a patch from upstream > before pushing the s

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-14 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 10 February 2023 15:11:19 CET Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Friday, 10 February 2023 14:47:19 CET Ben Cotton wrote: > > > 3. kwin — kwin_wayland often crashed when used as the sddm Wayland > > compositor and logging out of Plasma resulting in a black scree

Re: Fedora Linux 38 blocker status summary

2023-02-10 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Friday, 10 February 2023 14:47:19 CET Ben Cotton wrote: > 3. kwin — kwin_wayland often crashed when used as the sddm Wayland > compositor and logging out of Plasma resulting in a black screen — NEW > ACTION: Maintainer to diagnose issue Before spending any significant amount of time on this, it

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-03-20 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday, 8 March 2021 11:52:10 CET Miro Hrončok wrote: > nload cicku, fab, fale, orphan 2 weeks > ago I'll take that one :-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to d

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging

2014-05-07 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 06:34:48 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 16.04.14 12:46, Bill Nottingham (nott...@splat.cc) wrote: > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) said: > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.co

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-17 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 17 July 2013 15:39:23 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 17.07.13 14:36, Denys Vlasenko (dvlas...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > instead of administrators simply adding rsyslog or syslog-ng manually > > > at install time or to their ks snippets. > > > > And this too was answered several

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-17 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Wednesday 17 July 2013 03:20:42 Lennart Poettering wrote: > As mentioned before, if people run programs that require > /var/log/messages they should simply install rsyslog and be done with > it. > That terribly sounds like "my way or the high way". Many people have raised concerns not only ab

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE DM

2013-07-15 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday 15 July 2013 13:34:58 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 15.07.13 13:17, Martin Briza (mbr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > >BTW, I have some more multi-seat hardware to give away to folks who want > > >to add true automatic multi-seat to stuff like display managers. > > > > > >It's a USB bo

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-15 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday 15 July 2013 17:55:34 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 16.07.13 00:55, Dan Fruehauf (malko...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > +1 - same here. You're far from being alone. > > > > I'm still trying to get used to the new systemd in Fedora and still trying > > to think why I need it. Altogether

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-15 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday 15 July 2013 13:23:29 Lennart Poettering wrote: > Hence, the choice between "journal by default + syslog optional" and > "journal optional + syslog by default" does not exist. The choice > between "journal by default + syslog by default" and "journal by default > + syslog optional" howeve

Re: F20 System Wide Change: No Default Syslog

2013-07-15 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Monday 15 July 2013 16:29:08 Thomas Bendler wrote: > 2013/7/15 Lennart Poettering > ​[...] > Well, assuming that bash is entirely in memory. And also, note that > neither cat, nor cp, nor tail are actually bash builtins and will not > work. It's pretty hard (though certainly possible) viewing

Re: fedora release name problem

2013-03-19 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:27:16 Christof Damian wrote: > > Fixing an apostrophe – no > > Fixing our UTF-8 handling – definitely yes > The issue here is not only about the Fedora's release name rather than fixing our UTF-8 handling. Sounds like an important bug to fix, at least to me > Fixing

Re: Couldn't we enable 256 colors by default on TERM?

2012-05-31 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On Thursday 31 May 2012 02:20:26 Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 05/30/2012 04:16 PM, Marc Deop wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 May 2012 10:04:49 Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> I've some notes about 256 colors here: > >> http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/terminal_colours/#256 > >> > > > > That information is mostly f