RE: fedpkg failed with : Signature verification failed.

Thanks for the help. For the record, the issue was that doing a dnf update on the VM and simply accepting everything was installing some fedora 42 packages, specifically some GPG keys. When I ran without doing an update first, it worked. > -Original Message- > From: Brad Smith > Sent:

RE: fedpkg failed with : Signature verification failed.

s_FEDORA-2D2024- > 2D49a775adbe&d=DwIGaQ&c=BSDicqBQBDjDI9RkVyTcHQ&r=H5QohD_RgGRTO > mpJ5rew0X87YNwM_iH7SF9XZijdV0o&m=VPozc4nVhnAqv3P- > tb_fca_VfTrAMkEJ1LNBYYFkAlmDFMy2g_Qg- > leBG1b10V3X&s=xk4V87iqNc2nGVRolo5SRV_IfOtDXpgjtcIuZQuHjrU&e= > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 6:12 AM K

fedpkg failed with : Signature verification failed.

I'm trying to build my package for Fedora 41 (an F41 VM on an F39 host if that matters). Is it pulling in something from F42? The error is: fedpkg --release f41 mockbuild . [snip] . Transaction failed: Signature verification failed. PGP check for package "fedora-gpg-keys-42-0.1.noarch" (/var/lib

Spec file using github repo - not tarball

Is it possible for a .spec file to clone a github.com repo rather than download a tarball? Can someone link to a working example? I found a few hints that it's possible. However, the fedoraproject.org examples use pseudocode or placeholders. I'd like a working example. smime.p7s Description

RE: Simpler first tutorial package for Package Maintainer Docs

A review from a complete newbie ... 1. The link points to a pull request. Where is the actual tutorial? 2. The page refers to Pagure, Antora, ... I wonder if they're necessary for packaging. As a newbie, I would like an example that looks like: 1. Push the main branch to github. 2. Do these s

RE: Reichspogromnacht (was: SPDX Statistics - Kristallnacht edition)

For the record, Americans use the term Kristallnacht, and American Jews do not find it offensive. It is used as the symbolic start date of the holocaust, and there are often memorial services. > > > Note that the term "Kristallnacht" (or "Reichskristallnacht") is > > > itself a nazi propaganda te

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer - IBM TSS

I'm not 100% clear on the process. I have a .spec file that passes fedpkg mockbuild. I submitted the request to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238052. Is that all? What else should I do? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

RE: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

, April 19, 2023 3:49 PM To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key On 4/19/23 15: 42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 06: 45: 57PM +0000, Kenneth Goldman wrote: Newbie - first time . I'm trying to upload my SSH

invalid 'sshpubkey': invalid SSH public key

Newbie - first time . I'm trying to upload my SSH public key to my fedora project account. The web page gives me the above error. My key is an RSA 4096 key. ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAACAQ . y4lWQ== kgold...@us.ibm.com Is that the wrong format? Is RSA-4

RE: Package Tutorial bug - another suggestion, section vs. macro

Here's another "surprise for the new user" that I suggest being added. What does the % character mean? Sometimes it's the beginning of a section. Sometimes it's a macro. I see now that the web page color codes the two differently, but that's not obvious. It would be helpful to explain that ear

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl -> %build

> -Original Message- > From: Vít Ondruch > Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 6:58 AM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or > pushurl > > > How does it know what to build. Does it default to configure;make > > or so

RE: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

> -Original Message- > From: Jason Tibbitts > Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 6:51 PM > To: Kenneth Goldman > Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc > > >>>>> Kenne

RE: Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

BuildRequires gcc On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3: 35 PM Kenneth Goldman wrote: https: //docs. fedoraproject. org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ The tutorial says: Lines which are not needed (e. g. BuildRequires and ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an Untrusted

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

There's Source, Source0, and sources. What are the definitions? The tutorial doesn't have a 'sources' tag. Is that documented? What should it be? The hello tutorial has the URL to the tarball in Source: but it also says to use wget to download the tarball. The Source: tag doesn't have a list

packaging tutorial error - /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn mock-chroot debug advice

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ ~~~ when running that tutorial (Fedora 37, x86), I get this error: ERROR: Exception(/home/kgold/hello/hello-2.10-1.fc37.src.rpm) Config(fedora-37-x86_64) 0 minutes 18 seconds INFO: Results

Package Tutorial bug - missing BuildRequires gcc

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ The tutorial says: Lines which are not needed (e.g. BuildRequires and Requires) can be commented out with the hash # for now. However, I believe that this line is needed. I'm new so perhaps I'm missing somet

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

t; V Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 07:29:07PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a): > > > I think I followed all those steps - identifying the package, > > > announcing that I want to be the packager, making an account, etc. > > > > > > What's next? > > > >

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

Petr Pisar > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 3:29 AM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer > > V Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:37:30PM +, Kenneth Goldman napsal(a): > > How do I get packager status? How do I work with a pack

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl - solved

> -Original Message- > From: Miro Hrončok > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 8:56 AM > To: Kenneth Goldman ; > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or > pushurl - solved > > On 16. 02

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl - solved

> -Original Message- > From: Miro Hrončok > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 5:19 PM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora ; > Kenneth Goldman > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or > pushurl - solved >

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl - solved

If a maintainer of the packaging tutorial at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_GNU_Hello/ is listening ... There is a sample spec file. An obvious step for a newbie after running rpmdev-newspec is to cut and paste from the web page sample to .spec file

RE: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

> -Original Message- > From: Artur Frenszek-Iwicki > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 6:03 PM > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url > or > pushurl > > > Is there another argument to fedpkg? > fedpkg has a --name

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

From: Peter Robinson Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 4:57 PM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TSS maintainer volunteer jQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:16 PM Kenneth Goldman <mailto:kgold...@us.ibm.com> wrote: I have a fedora account

fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ Working through the basic tutorial there: fedpkg --release f37 mockbuild fails with Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl Failed to get ns from Git url or pushurl [repeats forever] How does

RE: fkinit -u instructions

> -Original Message- > From: Clemens Lang > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 12:59 PM > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > >> Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the > >> Fedora password is enough. > > > > IIRC, if you *have* an OTP, you have to

RE: fkinit -u instructions

Yes, much better, thanks. Someone posted that the prompt for an OTP can be ignored and that the Fedora password is enough. An explanation of the Kerberos ticket - why it's needed, how long it lasts, what fails when it expires, etc. - would be useful. > -Original Message- > From: Petr P

fkinit -u instructions

I'm working through the Packager instructions at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Installing_Packager _Tools/ There is a step: $ fkinit -u 1. fas_id is not defined. Is it my local Linux user ID, my Fedora login ID, or something else? 2. When I try it, I get

RE: TSS maintainer volunteer

, 10 Feb 2023 at 14: 56, Simo Sorce wrote: On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 19: 49 +, Kenneth Goldman wrote: > I would like to volunteer to maintain the two TSS packages in Fedora: tss2, tss2-devel. > > I currently ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender Thi

TSS maintainer volunteer

I would like to volunteer to maintain the two TSS packages in Fedora: tss2, tss2-devel. I currently maintain the source. I would appreciate any tips on what steps I should take. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe sen