I reported this back in August in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308102 and when I just attempted
the upgrade again now, it seems it hasn't been fixed still.
Basically, Bind is wanting to downgrade itself from the most recent version to
an older version, even when I have the most
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 08. 24 v 12:38 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > Please exclude pythran:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pythran/pull-request/31
> > Ack. Excluded. (But still included in the files below)
> > Also, could you please send a plain list of packages you plan to cha
Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
> libreoffice is done.
> inkscape, sadly, uses the unstable API and fails:
> In file included from /usr/include/poppler/Object.h:44,
> from /usr/include/poppler/GfxState.h:41,
> from /usr/include/poppler/Gfx.h:40,
> from
> /buil
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:57 PM Adam Williamson
>
> You are right - I meant to say it was suspicious that these commits
> were only done in the f40 branch, but are not present in rawhide.
> Usually packages are worked on in rawhide *first* and then changes are
> merged or backported to stable
> Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2024-06-14 16:25:56:
>
> Julia comes from a mindset or background where reproducibility is
> important. Think of data science where you distribute both analysis and
> code and want your code to always support your analysis ;-)
>
> Now, one thing is enabling t
Is there a full log somewhere? I don't see it on
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/, and the usual links at the top of the
summary email aren't there this time.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't
want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing
absolutely nothing and just hogging resources. Is this process only created
when something tries to talk to it on the DBus socket, or is it always
> Dne 05. 01. 24 v 11:10 Milan Crha napsal(a):
>
>
> There certainly were these changes:
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/0560a3a63dfdd6642724c8fad4db9dc...
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7ad...
>
>
> Vít
I don't think zlib-ng is the ro
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:08 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Wiki ->
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linker_Error_On_Security_Issues
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. Thi
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Well it looks like I took too long to do the deferral to F40, and so
> FESCO dropped the change:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059#comment-875144
>
> So now do I need to re-submit as a fresh change for F40?
>
My reading of the email rep
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:39 AM Gwyn Ciesla via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Libcmis 0.6.0 is coming to rawhide, and libreoffice-TexMaths,
> openoffice.org-diafilter, python-paperwork-backend, and libreoffice are
> being rebuild against it.
>
>
Thanks for taking care of this, bu
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE
> nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing
> include dirs:
>
> > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or
> di
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Minutes:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.html
> Minutes (text):
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.tx
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 09:24 Michael J Gruber, wrote:
> Am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa >:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:24 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco <
> stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A quest
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 00:17 Neal Gompa, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
> > > applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should wo
I think it is actually because of a change proposal, there was a recent
email about the webkit2gtk4.0 package changing:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IFRPWZNEFEGXGQFRNTH4LTFFLTJ5DOCL/,
so it is actually a problem I think.
-Ian
On Mon, Aug 21,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This is a status update for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb
>
> It doesn't include the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:25 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On ke, 26 huhti 2023, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Alexander Bokovoy
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This morning I woke up to find that packages I maintain were orphaned
> >> out of blue. Nobody contacted t
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
>> >
>> > https://src.fedoraproje
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:35 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 08:24, Ian McInerney via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 20:19, Ian McInerney via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/9/23 16
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean
> > install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I
> > haven't seen befo
I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean
install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't
seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing.
Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a 3rd-party repository
(the Intel oneAPI repo), and it i
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 5:07 AM wrote:
The GCC spec file already contains
Provides: g++ = %{version}-%{release}
and doing a `dnf install g++` does try to install gcc-c++. So please be
specific about the error you are seeing and provide more information, and
especially why you say this is requir
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Would like to unretire Include What You Use
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
Taken,
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote:
> Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but
> when installing built contour package, it shows the following error:
> ```
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(
Upstream appears to be disabling position independent code for some reason
in the crispy-core library:
https://github.com/contour-terminal/contour/blob/master/src/crispy/CMakeLists.txt#L100
(although they are using no-pie, which is odd since it is a library and I
would have expected no-pic instead,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implem
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
>
> > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> >> wxGTK should have that...
> >
> > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X
> series
> > as far as I can t
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 5:42 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating the opencasecade package[1] but the main downloads
> require a login.
>
>
Is there a specific reason it needs to be their premade tarballs? If not,
it looks like you should be able to pull the tarball from the tag in th
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted against
> trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK with a SONAME bump
> was built for f37+ but not all dependencies rebuilt.
>
>
This was announced back in July while F
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 4:14 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been collecting data about the dependency graph of Rust packages
> in Fedora for over a year now, and I would like to start the process
> of removing some accumulated cruft. In particular, I've been keeping
> track of which
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 7:45 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:05 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know how to reach prodsec about this?
>
> I'll reach out to the people I know and see what the best way to get
> them in this conversation is.
>
>
Has this conversat
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:02 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> While it is annoying to spell out each file it does catch package changes
> which might go unnoticed otherwise. In particular, we've had a few
> unannounced soname changes and such lately. [Disclaimer: I have not checked
> whether the main
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:07 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Switching upstream has increased the .so version from libid3tag.so.0 to
> libid3tag.so.0.16.2
> I plan to do the rebuilds myself after checking everything builds ok in
> copr.
>
>
> Affected packages
>
> Fedora:
> audacity-0:3.1.3-5.fc37.x86_6
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> wrote:
> >
> > I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
> > addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
> > make it easier for spammers to ge
I'll take it and review it. I don't have any ones to swap currently.
-Ian
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
>
> This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp
> enhances notmuch's capabilities cons
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
2, 3]. Since we are entering the final freeze this week, can someone make
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a):
>
> On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> > Error:
>
> > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
>
> > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of
I noticed in the electron thread that we now have FFMPEG 5.0 in the
official Fedora repos, but this will of course mean that certain codecs are
removed due to legal concerns. This prompts a few questions though:
1) How are these removed codecs handled in the library? Can we link an
upstream applic
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 2:15 AM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
> On 2/21/22 14:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/02/2022 19:25, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> FIDO keys are significantly more secure than OTPs, and FAS should get
> >> support for them. OTPs are still phishable, whereas FID
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:39 AM Björn Persson wrote:
> Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > A quick (and likely
> > bad and incomplete) bugzilla search shows
> > over 1000 tickets where there are upstream
> > updates that are still in NEW status in
> > bugzilla and had been (initially) opened
> > over a y
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires
> libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:444
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +0000, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> >
> > I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it
> picked
> > up the update just fine. I didn't think the updates-
It appears that liborcus had an soname bump yesterday from 0.16 to 0.17,
and the dependent packages were not rebuilt at the time. This seems to
affect only LibreOffice, but makes it non-installable in Rawhide. Can
someone rebuild it for the new library version?
Thanks,
-Ian
___
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 1:15 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +0000, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> > I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last
> night
> > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36
I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e
La
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:37 AM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
>> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
>
>
> Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I se
Apparently there were soname bumps in other lxqt packages that were updated
other than just those two. The qtermwidget package appears to have had an
soname bump from libqtermwidget5.so.0 to libqtermwidget5.so.1, breaking at
least TexStudio in Rawhide. I did a build for it, and it has been pushed t
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > > What exactly is wrong?
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
> >
>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in
distgit that bumps the version to 1.0.0
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:06 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:26:52PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
> > “GPLv3”.
>
> https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs (is this the right repo?) contains
> both COPYING.GPL2 a
Ideally, I think the %cmake macro should only add new cmake-specific flags
that are needed and not add any other ones not defined by the base
distribution to the build. None of these feel like cmake-specific flags to
me, because -DNDEBUG is applicable to all build chains, and the others are
in %opt
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:38 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/retire_NIS_user_space_utils
>
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This change is about retiring the ypbind, yp-tools, and ypserv
> packages, and removal of the {nis,yp}domainname user-space utility
> programs from the ho
I think if you jump more than 2 versions at a time the packages obsoleted
by fedora-obsolete-packages might not be picked up properly because it only
holds packages for about 2 versions before they are removed from it. So
jumping from F26 to F33 directly might miss the obsoletes from F27-F31ish.
-
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew
> > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
> > Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before the 7
> days
> > elapse, or should I let it wait? It seems weird that one release would
> have to
> > wait longer than the
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:13 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
> The same specialization of ProcessorCache:
>
>template class ProcessorCache;
>
> is explicitly instantiated in two different translation units:
>
> src/OpenColorIO/Processor.cpp
> src/OpenColorIO/Config.cpp
>
> which violates the C+
59 matches
Mail list logo
