Re: TPMs, measured boot and remote attestation in Fedora

On 08.04.2016 18:56, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:23:07AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> I'm curious how you would predict hash of initramfs because it is >> generated on the host and depends on dracut configuration and presence >> of various optionally installed packages. >

Re: no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

On 17.12.2015 11:15, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>>>>> "HH" == Harald Hoyer writes: > > HH> To improve the situation, we could make use of the new rpm weak > HH> dependencies. So the > > I'm not sure I see the point. The depende

no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

For docker containers, or containers, which don't want systemd, the current "Requires: systemd" in a lot of packages is preventing building a minimal image. To improve the situation, we could make use of the new rpm weak dependencies. So the Requires(post): systemd Requires(preun): systemd Requir

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On 07.12.2015 20:57, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I read your whole post. Those possibilities seem pretty limited, from >> the point of view of serious regressions in Fedora usability. It isn't >> that I "like" Fedora being less than technically correct (esp

Re: Easier %config management?

uld output to which package the file in /usr/etc belongs. Also the %config(noreplace) attribute has to be removed from the pristine config files. Attached is a quick hack to rpm I have done for experimenting with that feature. From 1eb125dd814a08b0a8bfd5e4ab95d38525caf5d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: H

Re: Using guestfish inside mock?

On 16.12.2015 00:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Cc-ing to Fedora devel list. > > This is related to why you have to install 'grubby' in order for mock > to have a /boot/vmlinuz-* kernel. Another thing we have to work > around in libguestfs: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libguestfs.git/

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Björn Persson: > Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. > > On any computer where it matters which network interface i

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb server because the NIC changed from >> em1 to eno1. >> >> Is this som

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Am 21.09.2015 um 11:07 schrieb Matthew Miller: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. > Or, if we're goin

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 14.09.2015 15:33, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) > - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing in

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 14th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add ite

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 7th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 07.09.2015 15:11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Agenda: >> >> - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) >> - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) >> - define the minimal install (continued) >> -

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting September, 7th 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued) - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued) - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add ite

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 31st 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 27.08.2015 14:36, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap > - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued)

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 31st 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mai

[Base] No Base Design WG meeting today

Ssia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

dnf distro-sync oddities

Correct me, if I am doing s.th. wrong, but # dnf distro-sync --allowerasing […] Installing: […] Upgrading: Removing: […] kernel x86_64 4.2.0-0.rc4.git1.2.fc24 @System 0 kernel x86_64 4.2.0-0.rc4.git4.2.fc24 @System 0 kernel

[Base] No Base Design WG meeting today

SSIA -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting August, 3rd 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org htt

Re: [HEADS-UP] Please test kdbus in Rawhide!

On 30.07.2015 20:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> Heya! >> >> I'd like to ask everybody to test kdbus on Rawhide. Josh thankfully >> added it to the Rawhide kernel packages, and our systemd RPMs come >> with built-in support, too now. If

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 23:26 schrieb "Adam Jackson" : > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 21:48 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > Then I don't get the argument of the libs requiring device-mapper. > > /me is puzzled. > > The changelog message sort of implies the libs contain

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 21:44 schrieb "Adam Jackson" : > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 21:17 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > > Well, then why not ship the udev rules with device-mapper instead of > > the libs? > > I don't understand the question. They _are_ ship

Re: Fedora minimal installations

Am 29.07.2015 20:33 schrieb "Adam Jackson" : > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:42 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > - krb5-libs requires gawk - why do libs require utils other than > > ldconfig? > > This looks like it was originally a Requires(triggerun) for the

Re: Fedora minimal installations

On 29.07.2015 16:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> In order to define the Base WG core package group and minimize minimal >> installations for e.g. cloud images and the atomic spin, I created some >

Re: Fedora minimal installations

On 29.07.2015 18:29, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:24:17 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:09:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A couple of strange deps: - libsemanage requires python (filed as

Fedora minimal installations

In order to define the Base WG core package group and minimize minimal installations for e.g. cloud images and the atomic spin, I created some dependency lists: There are so many definitions of minimum sets: systemd: container boot systemd + bash + login: container boot with login systemd + kerne

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 27.07.2015 13:28, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - define the minimal install (continued) > - define the docker base image (continued) > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) > - generic installer? (continued) > - Open Floor > > Please ad

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install (continued) - define the docker base image (continued) - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (continued) - generic installer? (continued) - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - define the minimal install > - define the docker base image > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt > - generic installer? > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to thi

Re: [HEADS UP] dracut-live subpackage

Forgot to mention.. This is rawhide only. John Florian schrieb am Mi., 15. Juli 2015 14:39: > > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel- > > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Harald Hoyer > > Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 05:31 > > To: Develop

Re: Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th July 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 13.07.2015 16:40, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > > - define the minimal install > - define the docker base image > - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt > - generic installer? > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mail. > s/June/

Base Design WG agenda meeting 20th June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - define the minimal install - define the docker base image - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt - generic installer? - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de

[HEADS UP] dracut-live subpackage

dracut now has a new subpackage "dracut-live" which is needed to boot live images with dmsquash. Please add this package to your dependencies. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorap

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 29st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 26.06.2015 11:33, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > - Interview potential candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - readonly root - plan to get rid of fedora-readonly? drop in favor of ><http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 29st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

Agenda: - Interview potential candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - readonly root - plan to get rid of fedora-readonly? drop in favor of - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 8st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 08.06.2015 10:29, Harald Hoyer wrote: > *IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* > > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Status - Docker > - Status - BuildRequires > - Open Floor > > Please

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 8st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

*IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Status - Docker - Status - BuildRequires - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 1st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

On 01.06.2015 10:50, Harald Hoyer wrote: > *IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* > > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mai

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 1st June 2015 14:15 UTC on #fedora-meeting-2

*IMPORTANT*: #fedora-meeting-2 ... I repeat: *two* Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 19.03.2015 13:37, Harald Hoyer wrote: > THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. > > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mail. > Minutes: http:

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 20:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:50 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. >> > > US doesn't go into Daylight Savings Time until Sunday, FYI. Yeah, my bad... anyway, I would like to stic

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 16:56, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > DST starts in the us on Sunday march 8.On Mar 5, 2015 5:50 AM, Harald Hoyer > wrote: >> >> THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. >> >> Agenda: >> - Interview candidates for new memberships >>

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 05.03.2015 16:56, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > DST starts in the us on Sunday march 8.On Mar 5, 2015 5:50 AM, Harald Hoyer > wrote: >> >> THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. >> >> Agenda: >> - Interview candidates for new memberships >>

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 6 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/de

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 26.02.2015 13:02, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mai

Looking for new Members - Fedora Base Design Working Group

Hi folks, the Fedora Base Design Working Group () is looking for new members, as Phil Knirsch left Red Hat and Jaroslav Reznik is tentative to leave the group. So, if you want to influence the base of Fedora and have a profound knowledge about the inner working

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Interview candidates for new memberships - Optionally accept new members - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor Please add items by replying to this mail. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 20.02.2015 14:35, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch > - Open Floor > Minutes: <http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-20/fedora_base_design_working_group.2015-02-20-15.01.html> Min

systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

To prevent surprises on the next systemd updates like in , we will not apply workarounds anymore in rawhide and track the issues on so, that they are not forgotten. We removed t

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch - Open Floor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Migration to Zanata

On 10.02.2015 04:44, Noriko Mizumoto wrote: > Hi Fedora developers > > I have not heard yet from the maintainers of the following packages. > Fedora Localization Project would like to have them migrated in Zanata > asap for good kickstart of F22. > We all are much appreciated your immediate attent

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 21 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!) - Docker update - Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages - Status rpm mechanisms for factory reset files - Base WG ownership of generic network install images (keep it on the agenda, until all WG members are back fr

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 14 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!) - Update on factory-reset work - Docker update - Open Floor Last meeting logs: -- devel mailing list devel@lists

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

On 01/16/2014 08:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges >> consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? >> I know I have not... >> >> I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates

Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

Analyzed the BRs more closely and produced some graphs for your viewing pleasure: http://www.harald-hoyer.de/2014/01/14/self-hosting-fedora-base/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproje

Re: Grub installation. First potential Fedora killer

On 01/10/2014 11:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 14:30 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote: >>> I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing >>> I would want is a distri

Re: where to report bad dracut man page content

On 01/13/2014 07:04 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858448 is openSUSE bug. Is > upstream > better for a rough parallel for Fedora, or bugzilla.redhat.com, or something > else? If upstream, where exactly is upstream for reporting poor man page > content? http

Re: Grub installation. First potential Fedora killer

On 01/02/2014 11:32 PM, Jean François Martinez wrote: > I have a nice booter setup and a nice _main_ Linux installation. Last thing > I would want is a distribution I am _testing_, that is Fedora 20 forces on > me it will be my main installation and forces me to choose between installing > Grub

Re: [Base] Summary/Minutes from today's Base WG meeting (2013-11-08)

On 11/10/2013 01:39 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > A few other things, I would like to see broken out would be sort of a lower > level definition for containers, based on the docker model. IE Can we remove > the need for systemd/kernel from the new container group? > > Base > Minimal Install > Conta

Re: dracut: how do I...

On 10/22/2013 12:59 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Difference in size between initramfs generated with and without nohostonly is > huge. I don't want to routinely use nohostonly, but neither do I want a > specific > root filesystem specified with root= in the image. I want root= on > cmdline > to be ob

Re: Automounting of the root partition in the initramfs

On 10/15/2013 04:23 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: >> On 10/15/2013 02:47 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a >>> dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root >>> partition, extends it to the maximum possi

Re: Automounting of the root partition in the initramfs

On 10/15/2013 02:47 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > All, > > The (admittedly hacky) dracut-modules-growroot package installs a > dracut script that runs in the pre-pivot stage. It unmounts the root > partition, extends it to the maximum possible size and then tries to > remount it. What I noticed in

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/06/2013 11:31 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 09/06/2013 11:05 AM, poma wrote: >> On 05.09.2013 16:51, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> >>> This Fedora release builds an initramfs tailored especially for your >>> computer >>> hardware. If you change your mac

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/05/2013 04:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: > Hello, everybody, > I'd like to know your opinion on one issue we have hit on live > installations due to the DracutHostOnly feature [1]. Long story short: > 1) Anaconda installs the kernel package > 2) installation of the kernel package triggers

Re: Dracut HostOnly or ConfigurationOnly?

On 09/05/2013 04:25 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/05/2013 02:10 PM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote: >> 2) regenerate the initrd at the end of the installation > > This is what should be done both for live and regular installs. > > JBG > I concur and say: 1) write out keyboard configurati

Re: [RFC] Easiest making kernel rpms from upstream git

On 08/28/2013 08:31 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On 08/28/2013 07:23 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Today I've wrote article w/ many notes about bisecting kernel [0], but >> I've used make bzImage, make install and the same commands bypassing RPM >> and I have IMHO good idea to write utility, that w

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit : >> $ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c >> no package requires json-c > > Probably should try > > $ rpm -q --whatrequires \ > "libjson.so.0()(64bit)" \ > "l

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 11:59 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 20/06/2013 11:52, Harald Hoyer a écrit : >> $ rpm -q --whatrequires json-c >> no package requires json-c > > Probably should try > > $ rpm -q --whatrequires \ > "libjson.so.0()(64bit)" \ > "l

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

On 06/20/2013 09:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > As it may be interesting and I have the data on hand, here's the package > diff between a minimal install of F16 and a minimal install of F19. F16 > has 203 packages (I think it's really 202 but I somehow got an extra one > into my test), F19 TC6 has

Please test dracut-029-1.fc19!!

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10871/dracut-029-1.fc19 Thank you! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Koji - Errno::ECONNREFUSED: Connection refused - getaddrinfo

On 04/24/2013 10:27 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 23.4.2013 14:33, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Hi, >> >> Since not a long ago, I cannot build Ruby for Rawhide, while it works just >> fine for F19. I observe following 4 errors in its test suite: >> >> >> 7) Error: >> test_proxy_eh_ENV_no_proxy(TestNe

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

Am 09.04.2013 00:00, schrieb Jeffrey Bastian: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:03:47PM -0500, Jeffrey Bastian wrote: >> I removed my initramfs-0-rescue-* file because I didn't know what it was >> and no rpm claimed to own it. How do I get it back? I've tried running >> dracut with various options and

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 18:08, schrieb Matthew Miller: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:04:52PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >>> Cool, thanks. Is the best approach to generate a dracut.conf in the >>> kickstart file? Or should it be packaged up in some way? >> Don't know a

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 17:59, schrieb Matthew Miller: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Depends on what the dracut image should be able to boot. LVM, crypto, MD >> raids? > > I'm fine with none of those by default, assuming it's relatively e

Re: dracut hostonly and cloud images

Am 08.04.2013 15:05, schrieb Matthew Miller: > We're going to produce official Fedora Cloud images which should run on > Amazon EC2, and various open source cloud infrastructure -- OpenStack, > Eucalyptus, CloudStack, OpenNebula; with both KVM and Xen -- and probably > also under VMware and Virtual

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

t; hostonly="yes" works as intended, with the exception that I meant you to install dracut-norescue... My fault. > > > Am 07.04.2013 15:06, schrieb Harald Hoyer: >> install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes >> of http://fedorapr

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

Oops.. I meant dracut-norescue of course Am 07.04.2013 15:06 schrieb "Harald Hoyer" : > install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release > Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl H

Re: what is "initramfs-0-rescue" in F19?

install dracut-nohostonly if you don't want that... see the Release Notes of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > -rw--- 1 root root 18M 22. Mär 17:06 > initramfs-0-rescue-74e76163c28448fba68b8667eb7b5d92.img > -rw

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

Am 22.03.2013 03:42, schrieb Orion Poplawski: > So, what to do about things like: > > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/464418/ > > where the crash occurs in end user code? > > Frame # Function Binary Source Line > 0 Vlarge_mat_vec_mult::__Vconfigure > /ourwork/pr

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 21.03.2013 07:44, schrieb Andre Robatino: > *IMPORTANT*: All DVDs and Lives are oversized, so will not fit on the > standard media. The 64-bit DVD and netinst should hopefully be posted > soon. > > As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alph

Re: using fedup to upgrade to f19

Am 16.03.2013 01:09 schrieb "Adam Williamson" : > > On 15/03/13 04:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >> When I can expect have an updates.img ? composing is failing to generate >> images ? > > > Possibly tomorrow, but it depends on the state of dracut and lorax. New dracut built with workaround for squ

[HEADS UP] initramfs - dracut - systemd

In case you were not bitten by Schrödinger's Cat in Grub or got around her, you might run in dracut/systemd problems in the initramfs. You will have to update to at least systemd-198-6.fc19 and dracut-026-48.git20130315.fc19 for a working initramfs. # koji download-build --arch=$(arch) systemd-19

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 30.01.2013 00:22, schrieb Dennis Gilmore: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:32:12 + > Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:53:32AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> as legal has said we cannot pregenerate initramfses i think this >>> should be a non-starter. >> >> We already ship s

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 16:53, schrieb Dennis Gilmore: > El Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:45:34 + > Jaroslav Reznik escribió: >> = Features/DracutHostOnly = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DracutHostOnly > >> Feature owner(s): Harald Hoyer > >> Only create &qu

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 19:28, schrieb Daniel J Walsh: > On 01/29/2013 11:20 AM, John Reiser wrote: > A generic fallback image should be installed by anaconda on > installation/update and never ever be removed. > >>> Also, fallback has interesting security properties… > > >> "Rescue mode" forces a

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Dracut HostOnly

Am 29.01.2013 17:20, schrieb John Reiser: A generic fallback image should be installed by anaconda on installation/update and never ever be removed. > >> Also, fallback has interesting security properties… > > > "Rescue mode" forces a SELinux relabel at the next boot, and relabel

Re: Rawhide boot problems

Am 12.09.2012 13:25, schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:50:15 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> Wouldn't it already help if the build system would just refuse to >> build newer versions in branches than which are in rawhide at that >> moment? > > That would be dangerous with regard t

Re: Rawhide boot problems

Am 29.08.2012 00:43, schrieb Jerry James: > First, systemd complained about being unable to find > systemd-journal-flush.service. Sure enough, it wasn't in the > initramfs. So I added > "$systemdsystemunitdir/systemd-journal-flush.service" to > /usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/98systemd/module-setup.sh,

Re: dracut > 009-12 never made it to f15-stable

Am 27.07.2012 06:46, schrieb Bill McGonigle: > On 07/26/2012 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> You can build them from git I suppose. > > Wow, I took a few minutes to learn how to use fedpkg and I have to say it > makes > this embarrassingly easy! Kudos to the team. > > dracut-009-15.fc15 worked

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:43 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/06/12 19:42, Brian Wheeler wrote: >> >> >> On 06/01/2012 12:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> I think most of the noise in this flame thread is due to a >>> misunderstanding how

Re: [HEADS-UP] Rawhide: /tmp is now on tmpfs

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said: >> I had been testing /tmp on tmpfs, but turned it off because it was hiding >> /tmp where httpd had dumped a lot of core files which I was having trouble >> removing. >> There is probably some tricky wa

Re: UsrMove, /etc/shells, and rpm interpreter requires

Am 10.07.2012 17:18, schrieb Orion Poplawski: > I just got the following: > > grib_api has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: > On x86_64: > grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/ksh > On i386: > grib_api-1.9.16-3.fc18.i686 requires /usr/bin/ksh > Please resolve this as soo

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Added an automatic test in the dracut testsuite, so that this never happens again.. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, rawhide sometimes eats babies. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Am 09.07.2012 09:44, schrieb Harald Hoyer: > Do not install dracut-020-51! > > Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing > to > the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root. > > To remove most (if not all) of the fi

Re: dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Am 09.07.2012 10:43, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Do not install dracut-020-51! >> >> Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of >> installing to >> the /var/tmp/initramfs.

dracut-20-51 - Heads up

Do not install dracut-020-51! Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing to the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root. To remove most (if not all) of the files, it has installed, do the following: # rm /.bash_history # rm /dracut-state.

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

Am 21.02.12 14:37, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: >>>> There is no reason to have >>>> /usr/shar

Re: systemd system unit files and UsrMove

Am 20.02.2012 21:19, schrieb Miloslav Trmač: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: >> /usr/share in our general understanding not to be used for >> package-private things. > Who is "we"? This is in direct conflict with the FHS: > > "Any program or package which contains or requir

Re: /usrmove and path ordering

Am 15.02.2012 11:20 schrieb "Ralf Corsepius" : > Yes. We've forked f17 and you guys are still chasing elementary bugs. > > What do you expect Fedora users to think of this? It communicates a nice impression of the quality of your works. > > Better stop this non-sense now rofl... "nothing else is b

  1   2   >