On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 10:52 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:39:21 +0200
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> > Reported as http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702366
> > and http://bugzilla.redhat.com/702354
>
> Well, here's NEWS:
>
> > * The RPC implementation in libc is obsoleted. Old progra
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 06:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Are you comparing git to Mercurial or to a centralized VCS?
>
> Both. Git is just a PITA in its own league, but DVCSes as a whole are a
> broken (*) and unhelpful (inherently hard to use) concept.
>
> (*) e.g. bec
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 04:25 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 22.07.10 12:06, Dave Airlie (airl...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > It is needed:
> > >
> > > if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
> > > # For new insta
>
> It is needed:
>
> if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
> # For new installations, hook unit file into the appropriate places
> via symlinks
> /usr/bin/systemd-install enable --realize=reload %{unit name}.service
> > /dev/null 2>&1 || :
> else
> # For old installations, just reloa
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:17 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is there a way to include pre-packaged workloads analysis? I realise
> > we'd have to regenerate these somehow possible for each compiler update
> > (not sure how the files look).
>
> What a "workload" means to the compiler is all the re
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:18 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> F14 now has gcc-4.5-RH compiler instead of 4.4-RH.
> For the changes (especially user visible ones), see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
> (though the list contains even many features that have been
> backported to 4.4-RH.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:51 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/08/2010 09:05 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
>
> > It seems MeeGo builds core packages by using PGO already. Is there
> > anyone who would like to volunteer to write a packaging guideline
> >
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> >
> > > IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
> > > with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
> >
> > Of
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 11:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 05:23:06PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > So in your mind, there is a majority of people on your side,
So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
about maintainership.
I'm come from working as a maintainer in the kernel, and its long been
said that kernel maintainers don't *own* the code, they are
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:00 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > So in your mind, there is a majority of people on your side, but they
> > are just too lazy to stand for election and take over the board?
>
> s/too lazy/too busy doing actual work/
> (as oppos
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:29 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ...or convince enough others of your position that they will vote for
> > the candidates you favour in our leadership elections. Since there've
> > been several of these since you first stated you don't approve of
>
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 07:58 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > So does gdm use multiple X servers, I wasn't aware there was any other
> > way.
>
> So what does it do exactly? Spawn a new X server on the same vterm? Or on a
> different vterm? What
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 02:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > In recent times some stupid (IMHO) ideas have been adopted in Linux
> > just to copy what others do. Just as examples: the control of desktop
> > widgets in KDE4 (functional GUI elements modified by a mouse-over???),
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 05:01 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 05/03/2010 11:12 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 18:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>
> >> Except karma requirements (which were in force due to the critical path
> >> process) did NOT prevent this particular regressi
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 22:37 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Orcan Ogetbil said:
> >> The statistic talks. It doesn't only talk. It yells. Ignoring this
> >> test statistic in favor of the large pool of imaginary users, who
> >>
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 13:56 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> On 04/29/2010 05:24 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 04:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> >> As far as I understand, both Nouveau and the Intel graphics driver now
> >> require
> >> kernel
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 04:15 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> As far as I understand, both Nouveau and the Intel graphics driver now
> require
> kernel modesetting, starting with Fedora 13. Before I edit
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Xorg_problems a second time I
> wanted to ask: Doe
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 09:36 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 15:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > On 02/28/2010 03:39 PM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> > > As Chen Lei said, the fact that JOGL needs this code may mean that it
> > > will be blocked forever for packaging, but I do not p
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 18:40 -0700, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering about state of Radeon SurroundView support in Fedora. I tried
> to get it working
> couple of months ago with 4670 + IGP 790GX and even got the X server start
> with 3 displays but
> neither Gnome nor KDE
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors,
> > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things
> > that are tagged for the release after they get th
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 19:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > It is. It's one step removed. There were people actively wanting to make
> > Zope/Plone work via a compat-python stack. It went all the way to FESCo
> > and got voted down. The zope/plone users were the target audien
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 18:49 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:41:15AM -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On 01/23/2010 09:08 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> How can I make sure drm/radeon/ttm modules are not loaded,
> >> until I do it manually myself?
> >>
>
So I say libdrm was going to be karma'ed into updates, and
I thought I'd disabled that but it all got confused a few days ago.
So I thought well I better push all the packages that depends on it
into updates as well, and they'll all end up in one signing pass
and everyone will be happy.
Now someh
24 matches
Mail list logo
