https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 17:08, Łukasz Wojniłowicz <
lukasz.wojnilow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Aug 2024 10:05:55 -0500
> maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:
>
> >Report started at 2024-08-03 14:00:44 UTC
> >
> >
>
> Is there a way to merge PR lists from multiple packages into a single
> backlog?
>
I don't know about Pagure, but you can make bespoke packager dashboards to
show whatever combination of packages/packagers/groups you like :-)
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/custom
Cheers,
Chris
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink:
https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/
Each version is updated for approximately 13 months, and upgrades between
> versions are quick and easy
>
It's right next to the download button :-) Likewise here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
I see, thanks for the advice! I made that change and job's a good 'un.
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 at 20:38, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 19:07 +, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have a GitHub Action (
> https://git
Hello all,
I have a GitHub Action
(https://github.com/dogtagpki/jss/actions/runs/5810230552/job/15794978022) that
fails due to a conflict between dnf and dnf5 when using the rawhide docker
image. I have been trying to keep up with the dnf/dnf5 revert story, but I may
have missed something abou
Mine just failed with this, which doesn't look great:
File "", line 225, in makedirs
OSError: [Errno 28] No space left on device:
'/var/tmp/koji/tasks/996/102220996/local/work'
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 15:31, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing (seemingly non-deterministic) FTBSes in b
Hi Sandro,
I see someone took gtksourceviewmm3, can you swap for apache-logging-parent
please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214834
Also unretirement; bump to latest upstream version. It is a parent POM for
metadata so it is a simple one.
Cheers,
Chris
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 08:1
How fun! Thanks for the links and explanation.
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 16:09, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
> >> As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
> >
As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
On Fri, 5 May 2023, 13:20 Miro Hrončok, wrote:
> python-rpm-generators License tag changes from GPLv2+ to:
>
> GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND
> (
>
> Right now dogtag-pki is off the hook, nothing shows that it is
> 'orphan-impacted'. However, for ecj I still get that and it shows
> explicit dependency on java-1.8.0-openjdk as well while ecj has
> following list of dependencies:
>
dogtag-pki spec explicitly depends on
java-17-openjdk-devel/ja
Apologies, I forgot to say I was getting this info from the Packager
Dashboard:
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/dashboard?users=ckelley
On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 22:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 07:23:10PM +0100, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > One thing I st
One thing I still don't understand is why all of our java packages are
orphan-affected by the orphaning of java-1.8.0-openjdk. None of them
BuildRequires a JDK, and the source/target/release values for the packages
range from 6 to 17. Can anyone shed some light on this please?
Cheers,
Chris
On W
ages and now everything works - thanks for
the suggestion!
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 20:42, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Kelley wrote:
> > TL;DR dogtag-pki is not installable on F38/Rawhide because
> > it fails the GPG check (F37 and prior are fine), even if
> > --nogpgche
>
> The above is done by about 2.5 people (counting multiple volunteers as 1
> person). This goes up at times and goes down but for the last year has been
> about that.
An aside - how/where does one volunteer to help releng?
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 21:22, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Ma
Hi all!
TL;DR dogtag-pki is not installable on F38/Rawhide because it fails the GPG
check (F37 and prior are fine), even if --nogpgcheck is specified, and I don't
understand why.
1) Why does the key not work?
2) Why does --nogpgcheck not work?
The error I get is:
[root@fedora ~]# dnf copr
For me it is:
99% "I want to check if local changes build" - fedpkg scratch-build --srpm
1% "Something changed in Rawhide and I want to see if X still builds" -
fedpkg scratch-build
I didn't know "fedpkg build" has a scratch option, TIL.
Cheers,
Chris
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 10:52, Daniel P. Be
Fortnight is not Old English, it is modern British English and in daily use
for probably 100,000,000+ people.
I use "every two weeks" when speaking to people who are not British though,
and it is likely a better choice here as an international list.
Still, it is not an arcane word and it solves thi
Fortnightly isn't ambiguous :-)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, 22:09 Jilayne Lovejoy, wrote:
> every two weeks was my understanding too, although I don't think Miro set
> up a recurring invite b/c we were also going to try to alternate the time
> of day to accommodate various time zones.
>
> Bi-weekly is
Thanks very much for the help - I have now built successfully! \o/
Although the spec BRs mvn(org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin),
> pom.xml doesn't mention it. Add this to %prep:
>
> %pom_add_plugin "org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:5.1.1" .
> "true"
>
I had actually tried adding the plugin
Hello all!
I recently took over maintaining the Jackson serialisation packages in Fedora
and I am rebasing them to the latest upstream version in a side-tag:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?userID=ckelley&tagID=60533. I am
experiencing curious difficulties I am hoping someone may be
Hi Steve,
You don't specify which version of Fedora each box is using, but if you
have one running F32 or earlier and one running F33+ then Petr is probably
correct. This is likely a result of SHA-1 being disabled in the DEFAULT
SWCP:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings2
h
21 matches
Mail list logo
