Re: mock: nothing provides user(vdr) needed by vdr-tvscraper-1.2.13-1.fc43.x86_64 from local

Many thanks for your help, will rebuild the package. Regards Martin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en

Fedora eln compose report: 20250425.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250424.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250425.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:10 Upgraded packages: 29 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:118.34 MiB Size

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:53:17PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce > > wrote: > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > > This aligns us with the effort going on

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:53:17PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce > wrote: > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > This aligns us with the effort going on upstream to retire the GNOME > > X11 session. It also aligns us

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:36 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 18:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Michel Lind > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 18:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Michel Lind > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via > > > devel- > > > announce wrote: > > >

Re: Fedora survey data

Tangential... There are that many ARM64 installs out there? Also surprised to see the number of s390 systems. On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 4:49 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 4:45 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel > wrote: > > > > Roy Bekken recently quoted Fedora version usage data fro

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:11 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel- > > announce wrote: > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > > This aligns us with the effort going on upstre

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:53 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel- > announce wrote: > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > This aligns us with the effort going on upstream to retire the > > GNOME > > X11 session. It also aligns us wi

Fedora survey data

Roy Bekken recently quoted Fedora version usage data from https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html but on inspection it looks that, while the analysis and plotting of the results are updated daily, the data may be obsolete---the latest version in the plots is Fed

Re: Fedora survey data

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 4:45 PM Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > > Roy Bekken recently quoted Fedora version usage data from > > https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/summary.html > > but on inspection it looks that, while the analysis and plotting of the > results are upd

ELN SIG meeting minutes for 24 Apr '25

* [Text Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-24/eln.2025-04-24-19.01.log.txt) * [HTML Log](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-24/eln.2025-04-24-19.01.log.html) * [Text Minutes](https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/me

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote: > == Benefit to Fedora == > This aligns us with the effort going on upstream to retire the GNOME > X11 session. It also aligns us with Fedora KDE. Like the Fedora KDE > SIG, the Fedora Workstation WG recommends and s

Re: mock: nothing provides user(vdr) needed by vdr-tvscraper-1.2.13-1.fc43.x86_64 from local

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 02:13:30PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > is it possible for the user “%{vdr_user}” to be a member of the group audio, > cdrom and dialout ? > > # Create a sysusers.d config file > cat >vdr.sysusers.conf < #Type Name IDGECOS Home di

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

I am sorry to repeat it for the 3rd time, But for a "stupidly minimal" stack, cage, weston etc... all exist with foot, weston-terminal, etc... You will be solved of many problems small and big, once the *only* stack is the wayland stack (maybe different protocols, but the same libraries). All c

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

I think its a mistake to remove X11 support prematurely before upstream drops it. Looking at the countme userbase from F40, when KDE dropped X11 session, shows a significant decline of about 50% of the userbase. While we can’t be sure dropping X11 is the reason, I’m not aware of any other contr

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:02 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 14:57 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > > > > > One thing that would need to be figured out is whether each of the > > > Wayland-based console implementations actually provides a mechanism to > > > switch between mul

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:14 PM Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > > On Thursday, 24 April 2025 15:12:42 Central European Summer Time Peter Boy Uni > wrote: > > Interesting. Could you perhaps elaborate on which of our standards > > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/#_our_stan

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

On Thursday, 24 April 2025 15:12:42 Central European Summer Time Peter Boy Uni wrote: > Interesting. Could you perhaps elaborate on which of our standards > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/#_our_standar > ds) this post violates? - Not being kind to the KDE SIG - N

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 14:57 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > > > One thing that would need to be figured out is whether each of the > > Wayland-based console implementations actually provides a mechanism to > > switch between multiple configured xkb layouts. This is something users > > of switche

Planned Outage - firewall update / possible reboots - 2025-04-24 20:00UTC

Planned Outage - updates / reboots - 2025-04-24 20:00UTC There will be an outage starting at 2025-04-24 20:00UTC which will last approximately an hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2025-04-24 20:00UTC' R

Re: mock: nothing provides user(vdr) needed by vdr-tvscraper-1.2.13-1.fc43.x86_64 from local

is it possible for the user “%{vdr_user}” to be a member of the group audio, cdrom and dialout ? # Create a sysusers.d config file cat >vdr.sysusers.conf

Re: f42: hostname vs. sendmail (vs. systemd depsolver) bug?

Once upon a time, Gabriel L. Somlo said: > Unless there's anything glaringly obvious that I'm too silly to notice > (in which case a swift kick in the ribs would be much appreciated), > I'll most likely move this conversation to the systemd mailing list, > and (in parallel) ask the sendmail mainta

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

Apologies for thread-breaking, I read in digest mode On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:45:52 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > As part of the upstream effort to remove X11 support > > In my point of view is huge mistake , I will focus my work on keeping > X11 , and I will fight against the remove X11 anyw

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

> Am 24.04.2025 um 11:27 schrieb Marc Deop i Argemí > : > > On Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:48:33 Central European Summer Time Kevin Kofler > via devel wrote: >> Yes, but only because *I* packaged kwin-x11 and plasma-workspace-x11 >> separately and went through a long argument in the FESCo issue

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On 24/04/2025 01:06, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 00:25 +0200, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: (but on a serious level, how does configuring keyboard layout / input method work if all you have is a compositor and a terminal app? presumably read from a file...has the format and location b

Fedora Elections Nominations Now Open!

Hi everyone, The nominations period for the following seats across Fedora and EPEL leadership groups are now open: Fedora Council - 2 seats Fedora Engineering Steering Committee

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

On Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:48:33 Central European Summer Time Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Yes, but only because *I* packaged kwin-x11 and plasma-workspace-x11 > separately and went through a long argument in the FESCo issue tracker with > the KDE SIG trying to block me from introducing thos

Re: mock: nothing provides user(vdr) needed by vdr-tvscraper-1.2.13-1.fc43.x86_64 from local

Thank you very much for the information. I still have a few questions as I'm not sure how to implement this in the rpm spec file. If I want to use the rpm spec file for both Fedora42 and Fedor43, do I need to introduce a %if condition. %prep ... # Create a sysusers.d config file cat >vdr.sysus