pá 11. 4. 2025 v 8:25 odesílatel Jan Grulich napsal:
> Hi,
>
> pá 11. 4. 2025 v 7:06 odesílatel Tomi Lähteenmäki
> napsal:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently libportal in F41 is at 0.8.1. At the end of the last year
>> v0.9.0 was built [1] but the build was abandoned for reason which I don't
>> know.
>>
>
Hi,
pá 11. 4. 2025 v 7:06 odesílatel Tomi Lähteenmäki napsal:
> Hi,
>
> Currently libportal in F41 is at 0.8.1. At the end of the last year v0.9.0
> was built [1] but the build was abandoned for reason which I don't know.
>
> Does anyone know if there is a reason why libportal should not be upda
Hi,
Currently libportal in F41 is at 0.8.1. At the end of the last year
v0.9.0 was built [1] but the build was abandoned for reason which I
don't know.
Does anyone know if there is a reason why libportal should not be
updated to >= 0.9.0 in F41?
I tested locally to build all the packages t
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250410.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 19.47 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025, at 5:14 PM, Luis Correia wrote:
> A 'thing' existing for about 9 years only makes it 9 years old, doesn't make
> it a good thing.
>
> I would be ok of Fedora dropping it when upstream does it, not before!
> no matter how much I like bleeding edge, this isn't the way to do
Hi Andrei,
> Am 10.04.2025 um 23:27 schrieb Andrei Mititelu :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm Andrei, a 27 year old developer from Romania with 1.5 years of
> experience, plus a background in QA(2 years) and technical support(1 year).
> In my spare time, I enjoy volunteering, swimming, reading and ha
>
> As others mentioned uudecode and uuencode are still used in a lot of
> places. I thought at one time they were outside of sharutils and hten
> brought into the project later. Are they asking about the 'shar' part or
> the 'uucode' part or both?
I believe it's for both. Either way, we can depr
Hi everyone,
I'm Andrei, a 27 year old developer from Romania with 1.5 years of
experience, plus a background in QA(2 years) and technical support(1 year).
In my spare time, I enjoy volunteering, swimming, reading and hanging out
with my parrot, Joselu.
I would like to help with any java related
El mié, 9 abr 2025 a las 20:51, Kevin Fenzi () escribió:
> i3 uses lightdm, no? Just like Xfce does...
>
Yes, we do. Hopfully lightdm will continue supporting X11. Sadly
enough it's developed by cannonical
--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Mark
Nishant,
it's a RTX3060
nvidia-smi
Thu Apr 10 22:24:00 2025
+-+
| NVIDIA-SMI 570.133.07 Driver Version: 570.133.07 CUDA
Version: 12.8 |
|-+-
Hi,
I tried to ping Kalev Lember at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315461 but got
"You can't ask Kalev Lember because that account is disabled."
I tried to write to him at klem...@redhat.com but got
On 25-04-09 10:16, RedHatGmail SMTP wrote:
This email inbox klem...@redhat.com is
Hey Luis
Please let me know which Nvidia GPU are you using ?
Regards
Nishant
On Fri, 11 Apr, 2025, 2:45 am Luis Correia,
wrote:
> A 'thing' existing for about 9 years only makes it 9 years old, doesn't
> make it a good thing.
>
> I would be ok of Fedora dropping it when upstream does it, no
A 'thing' existing for about 9 years only makes it 9 years old, doesn't
make it a good thing.
I would be ok of Fedora dropping it when upstream does it, not before!
no matter how much I like bleeding edge, this isn't the way to do it.
and I'll shut up now, I'm meaningless to this discussion
sorry
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:30 PM Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
> I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
> (without libpisp for now).
>
> Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you
> have some time?
>
> libcamera-apps fails to build due to using depr
So on the one hand, it seems a little petty for Fedora to disable X11
support in gdm before upstream does. It's notably still enabled by
default in upstream GNOME 48 and in git master.
On the other hand, if we're confident upstream is likely going to
remove the X11 support relatively soon, t
The Fedora Linux 42 Final RC 1.1 compose is GO and will be shipped live on
Tuesday, April 15, 2025.
For more information, please see the meeting log[1] and minutes[2].
[1]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-04-10/fedora-linux-final-go-no-go-meeting.2025-04-10-
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>>
>> As others mentioned uudecode and uuencode are still used in a lot of
>> places. I thought at one time they were outside of sharutils and hten
>> brought into the project later. Are they asking about the 'shar' part or
>> the 'uucode' p
OLD: Fedora-42-20250407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Kevin,
It's all good but then in Plasma also you can install X11 session
On Wed, 9 Apr, 2025, 11:08 pm Kevin Kofler via devel, <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
Or use any of the other plentiful options that exist.
Software needn't be stagnant.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025, 10:44 Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > You need to switch to another display manager, as GDM no longer
> > supports X11 sessions.
>
> Tim
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 05:39, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work
> well on constrained and embedded devices.
> >
> > Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current ma
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>
> > Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work well
> > on constrained and embedded devices.
>
> Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't want it
> either.
Lack of maintainer upstream
As Stephen wrote, the problem is the upstream lack of a maintainer, not in
Fedora.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:31 PM Stephen Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 05:39, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Is the main reason l
Hey Luis ,
You can make Nvidia Work with Wayland you just need to dabble in terminal
and config files
On Thu, 10 Apr, 2025, 1:49 pm Luis Correia,
wrote:
> An unimportant opinion from a User:
>
> Wayland does not work reliably for me, using what I need to use (nVidia
> binary drivers).
> I'm fe
On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:57, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel
wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
> > (without libpisp for now).
> >
> > Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-pl
On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
> (without libpisp for now).
>
> Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you
> have some time?
>
> libcamera-apps fails to build due to using
I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there
(without libpisp for now).
Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you
have some time?
libcamera-apps fails to build due to using deprecated stuff from
libavcodec
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//wo
Dne 10. 04. 25 v 10:27 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: drawing-1.0.2-7.fc42
Summary: Simple image editor for Linux
RPMs:drawing
Size:4.71 MiB
Oh, sad to see this one to be retired. Isn't there by a chance somebody
who would pick this package u
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM Marek Blaha wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> > It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp.
> >
> > Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time.
> > I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do:
> >
> > BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp
I've tired
but then I can't share screen with Teams, and get a lot of black areas when
doing a lot of stuff.
so, I gave up, no time to tinker with stuff that should just work, you
know, like X11 does
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 14:22, Nishant Mishra wrote:
> Hey Luis ,
>
>
> You can make Nvidia Wor
On Wed, Apr 9 2025 at 05:51:00 PM -07:00:00, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
If you aren't using gnome and want X11 sessions, you should have
switched to another display manager long ago. When gdm switched to
being a gnome session in the greeter... I'm not sure how many years
ago
that was now.
I think th
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp.
>
> Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time.
> I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do:
>
> BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp
> install %{_libdir}/libsdbus-c++.so.1.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}
V Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Marek Blaha napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with Jonathan on releasing version 2 of the sdbus-cpp
> library to Fedora. To do this properly, I planned to create a side
> tag, build the updated library and dependent packages which I maintain
> there, then no
Hi,
I'm working with Jonathan on releasing version 2 of the sdbus-cpp
library to Fedora. To do this properly, I planned to create a side
tag, build the updated library and dependent packages which I maintain
there, then notify fedora-devel about the SONAME bump and ask
maintainers of dependent pac
OLD: Fedora-42-20250409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
> Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work
well on constrained and embedded devices.
Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't want
it either.
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:16 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 2:56 AM Lukas Javors
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250409.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250410.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:49
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 16.51 MiB
Size of dropped packages
An unimportant opinion from a User:
Wayland does not work reliably for me, using what I need to use (nVidia
binary drivers).
I'm feeling forced into something that I don't understand why and am
seriously thinking of just stop using Fedora.
I also understand that the world keeps moving forward and
38 matches
Mail list logo
