On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 05:39, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky <ljavo...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is the main reason lack of maintainers?  Many of these C packages work
> well on constrained and embedded devices.
> >
> > Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't
> want it either.
>
> Lack of maintainer upstream or in Fedora?
>
> If it's the latter, I would suggest orphaning the package instead of
> dropping it.
> It looks like there are at least a handful of packages that still need it.
>
>
He was talking about the upstream maintainer in the GNU org wanting to drop
it as it is not something they want to continue working on.



> Fabio
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to