OLD: Fedora-eln-20250210.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250211.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:5.34 MiB
Size of
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:01 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, David Duncan wrote:
> > > We would be happy to assist you with building using the kiwi
> > > descriptions for them we are using now.
> >
> >
> I just did a test upgrade:
> dnf5[1297]: /usr/sbin cannot be merged, /usr/sbin/arptables points to
> /etc/alternatives/arptables
>
> On my installation these still point to sbin:
> /etc/alternatives/arptables -> /usr/sbin/arptables-nft
> /etc/alternatives/arptables-helper -> /usr/libexec/arptable
Mario Torre wrote:
> OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
> been updated in January for example.
This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora 41, so it
MUST get security backports until the Fedora 41 EOL. If the maintainers do
not want to take
Mikel Olasagasti wrote:
> Go-SIG has raised a ticket with FESCo [1] to propose a significant
> shift in Fedora's packaging approach for Go dependencies: moving to
> vendoring/bundling by default. This would represent a major departure
> from our current guidelines [2].
I am opposed to this. Bundli
> I did more testing and I think this now covers all cases of installs,
> upgrades, downgrades, and reinstalls.
How does this handel /etc/alternatives?
I just did a test upgrade:
dnf5[1297]: /usr/sbin cannot be merged, /usr/sbin/arptables points to
/etc/alternatives/arptables
On my installation th
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:48 PM Tom Rix wrote:
> >
> > I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
> > But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last
> > weeks before the branch could have been spent o
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:48 PM Tom Rix wrote:
>
> I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
> But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last
> weeks before the branch could have been spent on testing for F42 rather than
> scrambling to kludge/fix a lot of #
I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last weeks
before the branch could have been spent on testing for F42 rather than
scrambling to kludge/fix a lot of #include 's
--
Hello Michael,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 7:08 PM Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
> I built mupdf in a side-tag and will rebuild dependencies myself or via PRs.
Thank you very much for this!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 1:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I started replying to everything, but then I realized it's probibly not
> worth me doing so. :)
>
> ...snip...
>
> > To sum this up, I can see 3 benefits of mass rebuild:
> >
> >
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:13:57AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> I suppose it's related to the status of the "http-ipsilon" service
> reported as critical on the sysadmin list, so the admins should know
> about it.
Yes, there was a outage of auth and koji. ;(
Sorry for the trouble.
kevin
--
___
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, David Duncan wrote:
> > We would be happy to assist you with building using the kiwi
> > descriptions for them we are using now.
>
> Hi,
> should the Wiki page [3] be updated then? It looks recen
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I started replying to everything, but then I realized it's probibly not
worth me doing so. :)
...snip...
> To sum this up, I can see 3 benefits of mass rebuild:
>
> 1) change of dist tag
>
> 2) ensuring all packages builds
>
> 3) en
Hi there
mupdf 1.25.4 is the latest version from the release branch. It
collects several bugfixes but bumps soname as is typical with the way
upstreams versions. this.
I built mupdf in a side-tag and will rebuild dependencies myself or via PRs.
Michael
f42-build-side-105383
--
yes livecd-creator has been not working for some time
the Respins sig uses Livemedia-creator instead
Ben Respins Lead
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 18:10 +0100, David Duncan wrote:
> We would be happy to assist you with building using the kiwi
> descriptions for them we are using now.
Hi,
should the Wiki page [3] be updated then? It looks recent,
it mentions `f42`. Updating the wiki, anyone can benefit,
not only
We would be happy to assist you with building using the kiwi descriptions
for them we are using now. You can chat with us in #fedora-cloud to get
started. Neal Gompa did the majority of that conversions for the spins, if
not all of them.
El lun, 10 de feb de 2025, 3:02 a. m., Milan Crha
escribió:
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 09:56 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> I cannot find a place where to fill a bug against fedora-kickstarts.
> The page [1] says it's bugzilla [2], but when I try it, the bugzilla
> rejects me with "The component value 'spin-kickstarts' is not
> active.".
yeah, https://s
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:58 +0100, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Could you please rebuild them in f43-build-side-105065 and f42-build-
> side-105181?
Hi,
sure, I can do it.
Bye,
Milan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:10 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> It might be better off to directly retire them rather than orphan
> them if no one expresses a requirement for them.
Hi,
sure, I'm not against it, though when I looked into
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openchange
it offered m
On Пан, 10 лют 2025, Milan Crha wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to orphan the evolution-mapi and openchange packages for the
Fedora 43. Both are for the Microsoft's MAPI protocol. The OpenChange
lost its upstream many years ago.
The Microsoft released the first version of an Exchange Web Services
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 09:41, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to orphan the evolution-mapi and openchange packages for the
> Fedora 43. Both are for the Microsoft's MAPI protocol. The OpenChange
> lost its upstream many years ago.
>
> The Microsoft released the first version of an E
Hello,
I'd like to orphan the evolution-mapi and openchange packages for the
Fedora 43. Both are for the Microsoft's MAPI protocol. The OpenChange
lost its upstream many years ago.
The Microsoft released the first version of an Exchange Web Services
(EWS) protocol in 2007, with an intent t
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday, 10
February at 13:00 UTC. The meeting is a public meeting, and open for
everyone to attend. You can join us over on Matrix in the Fedora Meeting
channel:
https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org
You can us
Hi,
I cannot find a place where to fill a bug against fedora-kickstarts.
The page [1] says it's bugzilla [2], but when I try it, the bugzilla
rejects me with "The component value 'spin-kickstarts' is not active.".
The report I tried to fill is [3].
Bye,
Milan
[1] https://pa
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:58:15 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Hello:
>
> As of 2025-02-10 16:55 JST (= UTC+9), something seems wrong
> with kerbelos login.
>
>
> * fedpkg build fails with
>
> $ fedpkg build
> (gssapi auth failed: requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 500 Server Error:
> Internal Server
27 matches
Mail list logo
