* Jakub Jelinek:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:57:40PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
>> > It looks like most (all?) perl XS packages ('C' implementations of Perl
>> > functions) are FTBFS with GCC 15. I'm trying to fix
>> > perl-Term-ReadLine
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 21:35 +0100, Ben Beasley wrote:
> I just merged the side tag as:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7d2ef14400
Hi,
thank you for stepping in so quickly. The update is "stuck", I guess
due to the rpminspect discovering some ABI changes in the abse
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 16:44 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following the announcement[1] on intention to retire main GlusterFS
> package from Fedora 42 I thought it wouldn't make sense to have
> glusterfs-coreutils package as it is heavily dependent on glusterfs.
> There is no active developmen
Much like libtest, the mass rebuild has inadvertently bumped the soname
of libnfs. libnfs 6 was in dist-git but had never been built for
Rawhide (there were some attempts in side tags, but they all seem to
have been garbage collected). The mass rebuild built it, so now libnfs
has gone from 5.x to 6
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:57:40PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > It looks like most (all?) perl XS packages ('C' implementations of Perl
> > functions) are FTBFS with GCC 15. I'm trying to fix perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu
> > to be C23-compatibl
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 4:43 PM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> It looks like most (all?) perl XS packages ('C' implementations of Perl
> functions) are FTBFS with GCC 15. I'm trying to fix perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu
> to be C23-compatible. The workaround is to add -std=gnu17 to the CFLAGS
> which can be
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:32 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I don't think supply chain security was really mentioned in the thread
> yet (apologies if it was - I only scanned it).
>
> There's a real danger that if we forgo responsibility for reviewing
> packages to another project, then someone
It looks like most (all?) perl XS packages ('C' implementations of Perl
functions) are FTBFS with GCC 15. I'm trying to fix perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu to
be C23-compatible. The workaround is to add -std=gnu17 to the CFLAGS which can
be done via OPTIMIZE for MakeMaker builds like this:
/usr/bin/pe
I don't think supply chain security was really mentioned in the thread
yet (apologies if it was - I only scanned it).
There's a real danger that if we forgo responsibility for reviewing
packages to another project, then someone can add a bad package to
that other project and it becomes a problem f
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:18 AM wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 11:19 +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> > Hi Neal (and Dusty),
> >
> > On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> > > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and
> > > offers more modern file s
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:32:55PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> > > a way th
I just merged the side tag as:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7d2ef14400
As soon as the builds from the side tag are available in f42-build, I
will kick off a ceph rebuild directly in Rawhide.
I was not able to rebuild libcamera due to GCC 15 incompatibilities. I
tried p
Hello All!
I still have a couple of relatively simple Python packages I'd like to
be reviewed:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2337014 python-eth-event - Tools for
Ethereum event decoding and topic generation
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2328989 python-ckzg - An implementation
of the Polynomial Com
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-22/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-01-22-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-22/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-01-22-16.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.f
Results in COPR are promising enough so far that I’m going to go ahead
and start rebuilding the affected packages in a side tag,
f42-build-side-104083. Some of these packages take a long time to build,
so I probably won’t be able to actually merge the side tag until tomorrow.
- Ben Beasley (FA
I understand the suggestion to build directly in Rawhide since things
are already broken. On the other hand, I’ve already started building in
f42-build-side-104083. I’ll compromise as follows: I will finish
building everything but ceph, merge the side tag, and then rebuild ceph
directly in rawh
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 13:35 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Correction: the breaking update was built into side tag
> f42-build-side-99460 soon after it was committed, but the side tag
> was
> never merged. And it’s possible that the update was coordinated three
> months ago, and I just don’t remembe
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_Cockpit_Navigator_With_Cockpit_Files
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-replace-cockpit-navigator-with-cockpit-files-self-contained/142528
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document re
Correction: the breaking update was built into side tag
f42-build-side-99460 soon after it was committed, but the side tag was
never merged. And it’s possible that the update was coordinated three
months ago, and I just don’t remember.
On 1/22/25 1:31 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like the b
It looks like the breaking update in question was committed three months
ago,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest/c/24e4a26153b73a97db5c86109363662636235452?branch=rawhide
but never announced, coordinated, or built until the mass rebuild came
along.
I’m going to do a quick COPR test in
In one week, 2025-01-29, or slightly later, I plan to update usd to
25.02 in Rawhide[1][2].
As usual, this is an ABI-incompatible update with an SONAME version bump.
I will rebuild the sole dependent package, blender, in the same side
tag, and this will actually fix Blender’s failure to build
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 16:21 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> > > there are 1875 failed builds
> > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
> >
> >
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> wrote:
> > there are 1875 failed builds
> > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
>
> Hi,
> am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some m
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 3:08 PM Jan Drögehoff wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé berra...@redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > > An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> > > a way that Fedora (and derivative distros) are re
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé berra...@redhat.com wrote:
> > An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> > a way that Fedora (and derivative distros) are relegated to only
> > delivering what's illustrated as Ring 1. This is
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
> >
> > An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> > a way that Fedora (and derivative distros) are relegated to only
> > delivering what's i
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> a way that Fedora (and derivative distros) are relegated to only
> delivering what's illustrated as Ring 1. This is especially the case
> in the CoreOS/SilverBlue s
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 11:19 +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Hi Neal (and Dusty),
>
> On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
> > EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and
> > offers more modern file system features that can be utilized in the
> > future
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:51:28AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> An increasingly large part of the ecosystem is working and deploying
> a way that Fedora (and derivative distros) are relegated to only
> delivering what's illustrated as Ring 1. This is especially the case
> in the CoreOS/Silver
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:45 AM Ondrej Mosnáček wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 21:42, maxwell--- via devel-announce
> wrote:
> >
> > Report started at 2025-01-21 20:00:10 UTC
> >
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someon
Hi Neal (and Dusty),
On 1/15/25 11:53 PM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
EROFS is considerably more actively developed than SquashFS, and
offers more modern file system features that can be utilized in the
future.
Reading some through some of the thread it seems the main motivation is
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:49:17PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 04:24:28PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 20. 01. 25 v 11:29 dop. Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
> > > There is a second point to that, and that is Fedora as a development
> > > platform (not j
32 matches
Mail list logo
