On Thu, Jan 16, 2025, 02:43 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 2025-01-15 13:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15
On 2025-01-15 13:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hi,
My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
side-tag). Is this intentional?
It seems so. https://bo
On 1/15/25 07:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
dateutils mattdm, ttorling
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dateutils/pull-request/2
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Principal Software Engineer, Emerging RHEL
Red Hat, Inc.
--
___
devel mailing li
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 21:07 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 01. 25 20:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's a real failure. They're all showing up now because of a part of
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
> > landing. Seehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
Thank you. :)
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent from Proton Mail Android
Original Message
On 1/15/25 5:57 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 9:52 AM Jerry James wrote:
> Given the large number of packages I maintain that depend, directly or
> indirectly, on libiodbc, I flexed my provenpackager muscles and fixed
> this one. I also submitted updates for F40 and F41 to move them to
> the latest version, which is A
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/X86_MIPI_CameraHwEnablement
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-libpinyin-1-16-self-contained/142523
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
Please disregard the discussion link mentioned in the original mail -
copy-paste error. The discussion thread can be found on this link
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-promote-kde-plasma-desktop-variant-to-edition-self-contained/142526
--
__
Wiki -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Promote_KDE_Plasma_Desktop_variant_to_Edition
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-libpinyin-1-16-self-contained/142523
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Chan
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PlymouthUseSimpledrm
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-libpinyin-1-16-self-contained/142523
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Idris2
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-libpinyin-1-16-self-contained/142523
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, prop
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ibus-libpinyin_1.16
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-libpinyin-1-16-self-contained/142523
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 12:53:29PM -0700, Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> My Python 3.14 builds
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_1.5.32
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-ibus-1-5-32-self-contained/142521
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposa
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EROFSforLiveMedia
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-switch-to-erofs-for-live-media-self-contained/142519
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Haskell_GHC_9.8_and_Stackage_23
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-haskell-ghc-9-8-and-stackage-23-self-contained/142520
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change.
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Edk2Security
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-improve-edk2-security-self-contained/142517
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
proce
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_Zezere
Discussion thread -
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will onl
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CoreOSOstree2OCIUpdates
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-move-fedora-coreos-updates-from-ostree-to-oci-self-contained/142515
== Summary ==
Change Fedora CoreOS to receive updates from quay.io/fedora/fedora
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 17:23 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> > My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide
> > (no
> > side-tag). Is this intentional?
>
> If you mean that rawhide now uses gcc 15, then yes (not
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 8:31 PM Florian Müllner via devel
wrote:
>
> Mutter 48.alpha, the first development release of the upcoming GNOME
> 48, was released on Monday.
>
> As usual, this changes both the API version (mutter-15 → mutter-16)
> and the soname of libmutter.
>
> This should affect the
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 20:47, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Iñaki Ucar:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 19:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >> * Iñaki Ucar:
> >>
> Add -std=gnu17 to CFLAGS of whatever packages you want to use it as
> workaround (but don't forget to look at it back before Fedor
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:34 AM Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 January 2025 01:06:19 CET Jerry James wrote:
> > Emacs is uninstallable in Rawhide due to a tree-sitter soname bump.
> > Are the tree-sitter maintainers planning to rebuild (quickly!) the
> > broken dependencies soon? The
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 12:53 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Once again, this landed out of nowhere and broke many packages, just in time
> > for the mass rebuild :(
>
> It broke kernel as well, I thought kernel was supposed to be tested
> with
On 15. 01. 25 20:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a real failure. They're all showing up now because of a part of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
landing. Seehttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337007#c1 and
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/pull-re
The f42 mass rebuild is waiting on golang 1.24 landing in the buildroot.
See:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12527
Once thats sorted out we will start the mass rebuild.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- deve
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 11:51 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
> >> side-tag). Is this in
* Iñaki Ucar:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 19:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Iñaki Ucar:
>>
Add -std=gnu17 to CFLAGS of whatever packages you want to use it as
workaround (but don't forget to look at it back before Fedora 42 is
released).
>>>
>>> I was actually planning to keep it un
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 19:45 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the Fail To Install script filled several Fails To Install
> bugzillas like this:
>
> Your package (util-linux) Fails To Install in Fedora 42:
>
> can't install uuidd:
>- nothing provides group(uuidd) needed
Mutter 48.alpha, the first development release of the upcoming GNOME
48, was released on Monday.
As usual, this changes both the API version (mutter-15 → mutter-16)
and the soname of libmutter.
This should affect the following packages:
- gnome-shell
- gnome-kiosk
- gala
The f42-build-side-10
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 19:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Iñaki Ucar:
>
> >> Add -std=gnu17 to CFLAGS of whatever packages you want to use it as
> >> workaround (but don't forget to look at it back before Fedora 42 is
> >> released).
> >
> > I was actually planning to keep it until the next R relea
Hello,
I noticed that the Fail To Install script filled several Fails To Install
bugzillas like this:
Your package (util-linux) Fails To Install in Fedora 42:
can't install uuidd:
- nothing provides group(uuidd) needed by uuidd-2.40.4-1.fc42.x86_64
- nothing provides user(uuidd) needed by
On 15. 01. 25 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
Hi,
My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
side-tag). Is this intentional?
It seems so. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-
* Iñaki Ucar:
>> Add -std=gnu17 to CFLAGS of whatever packages you want to use it as
>> workaround (but don't forget to look at it back before Fedora 42 is
>> released).
>
> I was actually planning to keep it until the next R release, which is
> in April. Would that be a problem?
Would this flag
Many years ago I was sitting in the office of Denise Dumas, then the VP of
all things Linux at Red Hat (“RHEL Engineering” at the time), lamenting
that so many people want to know what’s on Red Hat’s mind, why can’t we
just tell people what we want? “Why can’t we?” she asked, and thus was
that “Wh
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> > On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > > No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for
> > > all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all
> > > members
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-15/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-01-15-16.30.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-01-15/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-01-15-16.30.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://me
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 06:02:49PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> thank you for clarifications and additional resources.
>
> On 1/15/25 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> >
> > David Malcolm has performed a
> > mass prebuild of Fedora
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 08:16:15AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 at 16:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:10:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 09:11:35AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > >
Hi,
thank you for clarifications and additional resources.
On 1/15/25 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
David Malcolm has performed a
mass prebuild of Fedora with ~ a month old version of gcc over Christmas
and its analysis is being fin
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 17:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:37:26PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > I was actually planning to keep it until the next R release, which is in
> > April. Would that be a problem?
>
> Well, it would be good if somebody told upstream before that releas
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 5:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
> should be retired from Fedora 42 approximately one week before branching,
> i.e. 2025-01-28.
[snip]
> libiodbc @epel-packagers-sig, rdieter
On 1/12/25 14:44, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2025 21:25:17 Central European Standard Time Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
My concern is that this defeats most methods of observability. It's
essentially the same as the double-fork problem we used to have with
system services
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:15:11PM +0100, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for
> > all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all
> > members of the "packager" group, for exa
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:37:26PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I was actually planning to keep it until the next R release, which is in
> April. Would that be a problem?
Well, it would be good if somebody told upstream before that release if
there are problems on the R side.
Jakub
--
___
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 17:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > I thought we had more time for this. R fails to build too, and the
> mismatch
> > between Fedora and R releases always makes this kind of change
> inconvenient
> > for us packagers
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:29:38PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I thought we had more time for this. R fails to build too, and the mismatch
> between Fedora and R releases always makes this kind of change inconvenient
> for us packagers.
I wish the mass rebuild was a week or week and half later like
I thought we had more time for this. R fails to build too, and the mismatch
between Fedora and R releases always makes this kind of change inconvenient
for us packagers.
Anyway. What's the easiest way to modify the default flags to set
-std=gnu17 for the time being?
Iñaki
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
> side-tag). Is this intentional?
If you mean that rawhide now uses gcc 15, then yes (not building 3.14 is of
course not on purpose, but it might be that it is
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
> side-tag). Is this intentional?
It seems so. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-920722dc45
is the update based on the side tag, and
Hi,
My Python 3.14 builds have started pulling gcc 15 in Fedora Rawhide (no
side-tag). Is this intentional?
Unfortunately the builds also started to fail, so I'm trying to pin
point the issue. The gcc version bump looks like a likely candidate.
Has the version 15 already been released? I look a
Thank you Miro,
I was certain that I had sent a fix for that to rpmlint. The problem
went away in my package in the CI (bodhi or Zulu, can't recall), perhaps
rpmlint was updated for the affected CI back then or was removed from
the gating/ci pipelines, or I removed rpmlint from the gating/ci.
On 1/15/25 2:33 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
No, AFAIK the @fedoraproject.org email alias should work for
all users who are in CLA+1 or something (so it should work for all
members of the "packager" group, for example, since signing the CLA is
prerequisite for joining the "packager" group).
Inde
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:28 AM Jeremy wrote:
>
> Good Evening.
>
> I hope this email finds you all well. I've been lurking for a bit but haven't
> developed the nerve for an introduction until now. By trade I've been a
> Linux/Unix Admin with a background in the US Navy, doing work trying to br
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:33 AM Cristian Le via devel
wrote:
>
> If anyone knows how to contact sham1, please let me know. I've sent an email
> to his/her personal email but haven't got a response. The pull request has
> been unreviewed for more than 3 weeks:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
> php-phpseclib fkooman, remi
I've opened a PR against phpseclib that updates it to the latest 2.x release.
[0]
This also fixes the FTBFS issue.
There is a new major version (3.x) available [1], but it would probably
be better to introduce that as a new package.
A.FI.
[0] ht
On 15. 01. 25 10:18, Robin Jarry wrote:
Hi folks,
I found out that rpmlint errors out without producing any meaningful result
when the analyzed RPMs contain binaries:
sh-5.2# strace -f -e trace=execve -s 65536 rpmlint
build/RPMS/aerc-*.rpm
...
[pid 107] execve("/usr/bin/readelf", ["readelf
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 42 approximately one week before branching,
i.e. 2025-01-28.
5 weekly reminders are required, this is the fourth one.
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Robin Jarry wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found out that rpmlint errors out without producing any meaningful result
> when the analyzed RPMs contain binaries:
rpmlint should not blindly assume that output is valid text, but
should probably print a meaningful
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:57:44AM -, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> I removed Petr as a maintainer of rpms/ipa-hcc.
It looks like the situation has been entirely fixed, thanks everyone!
Pierre
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Wednesday, 15 January 2025 01:06:19 CET Jerry James wrote:
> Emacs is uninstallable in Rawhide due to a tree-sitter soname bump.
> Are the tree-sitter maintainers planning to rebuild (quickly!) the
> broken dependencies soon? The mass rebuild is about to start...
emacs and neovim already have
Hi folks,
I found out that rpmlint errors out without producing any meaningful result
when the analyzed RPMs contain binaries:
sh-5.2# strace -f -e trace=execve -s 65536 rpmlint
build/RPMS/aerc-*.rpm
...
[pid 107] execve("/usr/bin/readelf", ["readelf", "-W", "-l",
"/tmp/rpmlint.aerc-debugin
On 15-01-2025 01:00, maxwell--- via devel-announce wrote:
python-pep440
Adopted as it's needed by a bunch of packages I (co-)maintain.
-- Sandro
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l
63 matches
Mail list logo
