On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 10:18:28AM +0100, Robin Jarry wrote: > Hi folks, > > I found out that rpmlint errors out without producing any meaningful result > when the analyzed RPMs contain binaries:
rpmlint should not blindly assume that output is valid text, but should probably print a meaningful replacement message when it gets something that is not utf-8. > interpreter > ~e\006K\006$\0067\004\022\006\003\344\001\202\006_\006$\006A\006\003\e\006U I just wanted to note that the tools probably just print anything until \000, assuming the string is "ascii" (or some 8-bit encoding). They probably could be smarted and reject anything that contains characters that are not printable ASCII… > I suspect this is a bug in binutils/files which should not print binary code > in lieu of the interpreter name. But maybe the culprit is in gcc. Yeah, is seems like bugs at at least three levels. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
