On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Indeed. With both dnf-5 and dnf5, the inner repoquery doesn't list exabgp.
> Either a bug or I'm doing something wrong.
And while I can hope that exabgp might be the
singleton case, I really don't think you, or I, or
other packa
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:05:33AM +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 10:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll handle those I've commit rights for, which is most of them.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-80962
>
>
> Hi,
> the leftover packages to be d
On 1/5/24 05:18, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 8:05 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LLVM-18
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feed
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:26:45PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:47:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Wiki -> https:
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 13:57 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On 08-01-2024 17:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Doing it this way was Ben's preference (he wanted to be able to see
> > that every bug was updated and get a notice from the script for any
> > single bug change that failed),
>
> Historically
There is no FESCo meeting scheduled for today due to the close
proximity to the previous meeting. However, we have two approved
Changes to announce:
= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =
Change: Boost 1.83 Upgrade
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3127
APPROVED (+7, 0, -0)
Change: Podman 5
https://p
On 08-01-2024 17:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Doing it this way was Ben's preference (he wanted to be able to see
> that every bug was updated and get a notice from the script for any
> single bug change that failed),
Historically, the script ran much faster than Bugzilla, which meant
after a whi
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 11:05 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 10:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll handle those I've commit rights for, which is most of them.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-80962
>
>
> Hi,
> the leftover packages to be done,
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 18:10 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 08. 01. 24 v 13:00 Sandro napsal(a):
> > On 05-12-2023 18:45, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Fedora Linux 37 has gone end of life for updates and support on
> > > 2023-12-05.
> > > No more updates of any kind, including security updates or secu
Dne 08. 01. 24 v 13:00 Sandro napsal(a):
On 05-12-2023 18:45, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
Fedora Linux 37 has gone end of life for updates and support on
2023-12-05.
No more updates of any kind, including security updates or security
announcements, will be available for Fedora Linux 37 after the said
d
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 11:06 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 10:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll handle those I've commit rights for, which is most of them.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-80962
>
>
> Hi,
> the leftover packages to be done, fo
On 08-01-2024 17:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 16:10 +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
I'll get the EOL-close script running again, it kept timing out so I
thought it was finished but clearly not - my mistake and apologies :-/
Just so folks are aware, the EOL closure uses a script
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 16:10 +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
> I'll get the EOL-close script running again, it kept timing out so I
> thought it was finished but clearly not - my mistake and apologies :-/
Just so folks are aware, the EOL closure uses a script:
https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/pgm_scripts/b
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:37 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:47:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
> >
> > I do not see
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 04:58:23AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >> == Summary ==
> >> The `/usr/sbin` directory becomes a symlink to `bin`, which means
> >> paths like `/usr/bin/foo` and `/usr/sbin/foo` point to the same place.
> >>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:02:55AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> > >
> > > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> > >
>
> I agree unifying the *programs* to a single directory makes sense. But I
> fail to se
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:47:25PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> >
> > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> >
>
> I do not see as part of the plan a process to
> go through all Fedora packages and identifying
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:14:49AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:20:11AM +0100, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > Dne 20. 12. 23 v 20:53 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> > > ** Adjust `%_sbindir` in `/usr/lib/rpm/macros` (part of `rpm`
> > > package). Packages will be updated automat
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:15:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:58:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Aoife Moloney:
> >
> > > == Detailed Description ==
> > > The split between `/bin` and `/sbin` is not useful, and also unused.
> >
> > Programs in /usr/bin h
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240107.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240108.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 62
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 10:34 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll handle those I've commit rights for, which is most of them.
>
> ...
>
>fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-80962
Hi,
the leftover packages to be done, for which I do not have commit
rights, are:
elementary-calendar
ev
Thank you for your feedback.
After some thinking, I've decided to not start the Fedora Change process,
nor to merge these changes.
These changes are not suited for Fedora use cases.
Once again, I appreciate the discussion
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 7:14 PM Tomáš Mráz wrote:
> In my opinion none o
Hi,
the 3.51.1 release of the evolution-data-server contains a soname
version bump of a libecal-2.0 library, due to an API change in one
function. I do not think it affects the dependencies, thus only
a simple rebuild should be needed, otherwise a new parameter will be
added to the call of
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 15:15 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> So my suggestion would be to use a self service side tag for rawhide
> as well, not just F39.
Hi,
thanks for the confirmation. It means more manual work to be done (and
not be forgotten), but I see it has also its advantages. I'll do
Just FTR, there is attachment with logs. I have not noticed it on the
first look, but Leigh did :)
Vít
Dne 07. 01. 24 v 1:41 Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a):
Hello Patrick,
What was the command you issued? Were there any errors before the
excerpt you've posted? Does your user belong to the
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 12:50 +0100, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> An interesting thing to note about that is that it is using ;-list
> formatting in CMake for this call, but according to the docs for
> CheckCSourceCompiles, these CMAKE_REQUIRED_<> variables should have
> the values space-separate
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
I agree unifying the *programs* to a single directory makes sense. But I
fail to see anything good come out of bringing all those system daemon
executables into every user
27 matches
Mail list logo
