On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:47:25PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM Aoife Moloney <amolo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wiki -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin
> >
> 
> I do not see as part of the plan a process to
> go through all Fedora packages and identifying
> binaries in /usr/bin that have the same name
> as a binary in /usr/sbin (from the same, or
> different packages) such that the packager
> (or the multiple packages) will need to
> coordinate the changes (perhaps by engaging
> upstream).

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin#Scope
lists 9 packages that was aware of that use usermode.

$ dnf5 repoquery -l $(dnf5 repoquery --whatprovides '/usr/sbin/*' --qf 
'%{name}\n') | rg '/usr/s?bin/' | sed -r 's|(.*)/([^/]*)$|\2|' | sort | uniq -c 
| rg -w 2

says that /usr/sbin/{makemap,rpcinfo,rpcbind,sestatus,udevadm}
"shadow" files in /usr/bin. But those are all symlinks, i.e. they will
need just to be dropped to prevent a FTBFS. I added this list with
four packages to the Scope section.

Zbyszek
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to