On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 17.40:
> >
> > > On Sep 15, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Otto Liljalaakso
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > So maybe it is just that, for Fedora 36 at least, RPM Fusion it
> > > not compatible with the new crypto se
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64 6.7 MB/s | 81 MB 00:11
Fedora 37 openh264
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> RPM Fusion Fedora 37 repository seems to be all SHA256 already.
Thanks for doing the research. I plan on upgrading to the F37 beta
soon. Have you done so already and what are your results?
___
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > datanommer-commands
> > @ralph
> > ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2098693
> > Seems to have been updated in dist-git to a version with missing
> > dependencies?
>
> Looking into this one now.
OK, this is fixed now, though I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220915.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 170
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 493.42 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
I support this plan, and I will retire mkdocs-markdownextradata-plugin as well.
– Ben Beasley (FAS music)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022, at 4:14 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm planning to retire mkdocs and python-mkdocs-redirects the coming
> weekend. mkdocs is currently FTI in F37 and F38. The reas
On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 16:01 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> datagrepper
> @ralph
> ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2098691
> Upstream (Fedora Infra) pins dependencies aggressively,
> needs to be relaxed downstream (also Fedora Infra) as a workaround.
> Maybe persuade upstream into not doing th
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 04:34:08PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 9/15/22 13:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >>
> >> Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> >> responsible for security-related bi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 11:54:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 10:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > >
> > > Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> > > responsible for s
if we can have chromium-src-devel ...
> > > But, one thing that could be done to simplify things would be to
> > > ship
> > > a chromium-src-devel package in the chromium package that
> > > electron
> > > could pull in. That would tightly couple the chromium and
> > > electron
> > > packages, but
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:08 +0300, Timo Saarinen wrote:
> > On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hi,
> > where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ?
> > is not is any known repo that I'm aware
>
> Hi,
>
> signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installe
On 9/15/22 13:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>
>> Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
>> responsible for security-related bits of the distribution. Compilers?
>
> Well, as others noted in this thread,
Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 17.40:
On Sep 15, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
So maybe it is just that, for Fedora 36 at least, RPM Fusion it not compatible
with the new crypto settings.
I also see the following key ids in the errors I reported in the original
message.
Thanks for the info and yeah, that seemed to do the trick in enabling
it, but unfortunately it still works, in that I am able to build the
package successfully without errors. :\
On 13 Sep 2022, at 14:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:36 PM Ron Olson
wrote:
Unfortunately I ca
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:22 AM Jerry James wrote:
> ANTLR4 4.11.1 has been released. It includes an soname bump in the
> C++ runtime, and a non-backwards compatible change in the Java
> runtime. I plan to update next week. I will rebuild all dependent
> packages, unless the maintainers prefer
Resuming this thread as the podman and podman-desktop teams are
looking to get podman-desktop packaged in Fedora
But it's unlikely either team would be able to own the nodejs-electron dep.
Would the nodejs sig and/or fedora desktop team and/or chromium
maintainers be willing to package and own nod
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 6:58 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> There's a kind of "surprising" property of the critical path list too -
> it contains some things you might not expect.
I was (initially) thinking of the critical-path-base list,
but you are right that the critical path is in the eyes of
t
I'm unable to figure out why, but running the command:
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37
on my main system (with RPMFusion and some copr repos enabled)
consistently causes dnf to segfault. The crashing function appears to
be solver_addbestrules. In either case, I'm submitting a bug
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 18:36 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 5:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > >
> > > Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> > > responsible for secur
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 10:55 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >
> > Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> > responsible for security-related bits of the distribution. Compilers?
>
> Well, as others n
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 5:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> >
> > Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> > responsible for security-related bits of the distribution. Compilers?
Perhaps any packager w
On 9/14/22 03:51, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 13/09/2022 23:50, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Another option is a TPM-based authenticator. Would this be acceptable?
No. TPM 2.0 chip is a *proprietary* black box. Some of them have known
critical security vulnerabilities[1].
OK, but so i
On 15. 09. 22 19:14, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
As I'm implementing this, I'm realizing that it probably only makes
sense to have the default version of Node.js on each Fedora release
provide the unversioned-command. Otherwise it becomes really hard to
ensure that the RPM macros like %{nodejs_sitel
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 09:26:36AM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>
> Proven packagers seem to be a fair category to address. Also packagers
> responsible for security-related bits of the distribution. Compilers?
Well, as others noted in this thread, any packager has a lot of power.
They can ad
As I'm implementing this, I'm realizing that it probably only makes
sense to have the default version of Node.js on each Fedora release
provide the unversioned-command. Otherwise it becomes really hard to
ensure that the RPM macros like %{nodejs_sitelib} refer to the correct
location. So I think I'
On 15/09/2022 13:35, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
1. install snapd
No. Thanks.
Please build regular RPMs.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
I didn't notice that this package got orphaned then retired. I plan to
maintain it (I'm the author of the code, but somebody else added it to
Fedora so I just let them do the maintenance, which never really
needed any work).
I've submitted a ticket to unretire it.
_
Hi all,
I've virtually attended OpenPrinting Micro Conference on Linux Plumbers
2022 and took notes about our latest development - the notes are in
attachment.
From the development field the highlight is that *we don't release CUPS
2.5 (and 3.0) until we have full OAuth support*, which will
> On Sep 15, 2022, at 10:26 AM, Otto Liljalaakso
> wrote:
>
> Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 16.28:
>>> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
>>> To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
>>> installed
>>> as Fedora 24, now running 36. For some rp
Tommy Nguyen kirjoitti 15.9.2022 klo 16.28:
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
installed
as Fedora 24, now running 36. For some rpm and dnf operations, I get
the
following kind of errors:
error: rpmdbNextItera
On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 08:39:56AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> On 9/5/22 19:45, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:19:51AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > > > Bottom line opinion: hardened_malloc ... costs too much.
> > >
> > > Attempting to be constructive: Psychologically, I might
Thing is, it's confusing for every distro to use different names for
the same thing, like we did for webkit2gtk-4.0. But we seem to have all
standardized on using the pkg-config version for the package name now.
Consistency with other distros is worth a lot.
On Thu, Sep 15 2022 at 03:33:12 PM
Hello
On 14/09/2022 17:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks!
We are approaching Fedora 37 Final Freeze, which will start on
2022-10-04.
There are still 33 packages in Fedora 37 that will need to be rebuilt
with Python 3.11 in order to be installable (most of them). I propose
to retire the n
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 3:53 AM Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the latest webkitgtk package now uses the following subpackage names:
> * webkit2gtk4.0 and webkit2gtk4.1 are for GTK 3,
> * webkit2gtk5.0 are for GTK 4.
>
> As you can see, the WebKitGTK sover
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 16:18 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> To test this, I did enable TEST-FEDORA39 on my system, first
> installed
> as Fedora 24, now running 36. For some rpm and dnf operations, I get
> the
> following kind of errors:
>
> error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 740
> Head
Ben Cotton kirjoitti 29.8.2022 klo 21.30:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StrongCryptoSettings3Forewarning2
== Summary ==
Cryptographic policies will be tightened in Fedora ''38''-39,
SHA-1 signatures will no longer be trusted by default.
Fedora ''38'' will do a "jump scare", introducing
On 9/15/22 08:57, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 10:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
wrote:
If you test upgrades from f36 to f37 currently, you get:
webkit2gtk4.0.x86_64 2.37.91-1.fc37 replaces webkit2gtk3.x86_64 2.36.7-1.fc36
webkit2gtk4.1.x86_64 2.37.91-1.fc37 installed as upgrade
webkit2gtk5.0.x86_64 2.37.91-1.fc37 installed as upgrade
That surely is confusing, unless you've been rea
On Wed, 14 Sept 2022 at 18:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 15:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-09-14 at 10:25 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 14 2022 at 06:58:12 AM +, Tommy Nguyen
> > > wrote:
> > > > I'm not entirely convinced. See thi
Hi!
On Wednesday, 14 September 2022 at 16:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> We are approaching Fedora 37 Final Freeze, which will start on 2022-10-04.
>
> There are still 33 packages in Fedora 37 that will need to be rebuilt with
> Python 3.11 in order to be installable (most of them).
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:10:41 +0200
Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got a question about how should I track the removal of "Provides and
> Obsoletes" from the new minizip-ng package.
>
> We've decided to remove them in Fedora 42, but it's impossible to remember
> to do it for 2 years.
> T
Hi,
I just got a question about how should I track the removal of "Provides and
Obsoletes" from the new minizip-ng package.
We've decided to remove them in Fedora 42, but it's impossible to remember
to do it for 2 years.
There is no way to file a Bugzilla to Fedora 42 yet.
Is there some place wh
> On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ?
> is not is any known repo that I'm aware
Hi,
signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed it using
the following commands.
dnf config-manager --add-repo
http
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> We are approaching Fedora 37 Final Freeze, which will start on 2022-10-04.
>
> There are still 33 packages in Fedora 37 that will need to be rebuilt with
> Python 3.11 in order to be installable (most of them). I propose to re
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:52 PM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
> Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
> package.
>
> However, I think that for people on Workstation who
Works fine for me.
Removing:
kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
@updates 0
kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36
@updates 92 M
kernel-modules
Hi
I'm planning to retire mkdocs and python-mkdocs-redirects the coming
weekend. mkdocs is currently FTI in F37 and F38. The reason is
incompatibility with python-markdown-3.4.x, which upstream will not
address in the immediate future [1]. Given that mkdocs is a leaf package
and no other pack
On 2022-09-14 20:17, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
On 2022-09-14 07:01, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello folks!
luya dlib
dlib
@bizdelnick @luya
ASSIGNED https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2098694
Bundles old pybind11 which is not Python 3.11 compatible,
needs to be unbundled or at least updated.
Upstr
Miroslav Lichvar wrote on 2022/09/15 16:14:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
unrelated reasons.
All the packages
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Problem 1: problem with installed package mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch
- mkdocs-
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
> > too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
> > unrelated reasons.
> >
> All the packages on your list except the 4 you
51 matches
Mail list logo
