Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

2022-07-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Hi all, As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent packages to be automat

Re: repoquery-fu (was Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora)

2022-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 2:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:47 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > - the sets of dependent packages overlap between concurrently created side > > tags > > So what? If we're not tracking rebuilds in Git anymore, this is no > longer a serious probl

Re: empty reply from server error

2022-07-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 16:47 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 01:47:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel napsal(a): > > However, I get the following error in the build log (of koji): > > > > > > > > checking whether the C compiler works... no > > configure: error: in `/builddir/bu

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

2022-07-24 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't > available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think > it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still > built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

2022-07-24 Thread Kalev Lember
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > Hi all, > > As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from > libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4 to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. > > This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect > all dependent

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

2022-07-24 Thread Kalev Lember
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: > > glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs > to > > be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? > > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

2022-07-24 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs to be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/34b203d

Heads-up: ODE soname bump

2022-07-24 Thread Hedayat Vatankhah
Hi all, As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent packages to be automatically built again during this process. W

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

2022-07-24 Thread Kalev Lember
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Il sab 23 lug 2022, 19:12 Adam Williamson ha > scritto: > >> This of course begs a question: did qemu also have a non-static pcre >> requirement at the time? But it seems not: >> >> [adamw@xps13k qemu (f36 %)]$ git show 0835325:qemu.spec

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220724.n.0 changes

2022-07-24 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220723.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220724.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 60 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1010.54 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

The performance impact of various debug options on Fedora Rawhide debug kernels

2022-07-24 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
The current Fedora Rawhide kernels are too slow to run libguestfs tests when doing Koji builds. These run in a qemu VM, running the Rawhide kernel, emulated using software virtualization (ie. TCG). They now time out because these kernels are so slow. Until fairly recently they were slow but worki