> Am 15.10.2021 um 06:17 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x.
> ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far as I can tell.
https://imagemagick.org/index.php: "We continue to maintain the legacy release
of ImageMagick, version 6, at
On 10/15/21 5:13 AM, Michal Schorm wrote:
Thinking about this more, I always get to a question:
"Who are the consumers of that information and what do they actually
use it for?"
My personal idea is that the _ recommended _ requirements (of any OS)
are seeked by people that
1/ are going to instal
Hi,
The Zuul CI for pull requests does everything that the Fedora CI does
(scratch builds and tmt/standard tests) and more. Is there any reason
to keep Fedora CI on pull requests?
- Tom
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 10/14/21 4:23 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/12/21 7:23 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/1/21 12:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones mailto:rjo...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:27 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:55AM -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > > I will take that package because it is used by Fedora Design team for
> > > conversion and some applications depend on it.
> > Luya, if you'd also like some help, I'd be
On 10/13/2021 8:51 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.10.2021 um 15:44 +0200 schrieb Iñaki Ucar:
Hi,
RStudio is failing consistently on armv7l on F35 [1, 2] and rawhide
[3, 4] with this message (memory exhausted). The same build on the
same machine (CPU and RAM) succeeds on
On 10/13/2021 10:06 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Building with lto disabled is a bad idea, as Fedora intentionally
enabled lto by default.
Yes, but there is nothing inherently wrong with not using LTO. Many
packages opt-out for various reasons.
What you describe as lto requires a lot
On 10/13/2021 10:37 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 06:06:50 PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser
wrote:
What you describe as lto requires a lot of memory is caused by building
lto along with non-lto in the same object file requires significantly
more memory. For that reason
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:38 PM Davide Cavalca wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:00 +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been
> > > requested and accepted as an FE f
Thinking about this more, I always get to a question:
"Who are the consumers of that information and what do they actually
use it for?"
My personal idea is that the _ recommended _ requirements (of any OS)
are seeked by people that
1/ are going to install the system on some hardware on which that
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:00 +, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been
> > requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't
> > done anything yet.
>
> Tha
On 10/12/21 7:23 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 10/1/21 12:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones mailto:rjo...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:03:07PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to start packaging LLVM 13.0
The License field for python-pdfminer has been corrected from “MIT” to “MIT and
Public Domain and APAFML and BSD”. Its -doc subpackage remains “MIT”.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
Hello everybody!
I'm Peter and I use Linux for quite some time considering myself an
enthusiast. I mainly use Fedora and Arch linux, both on a daily basis but I
have experience with plenty of other distributions also.
The main reason I'm writing this email is that I miss a retired package (
scrot
> Am 14.10.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Michal Schorm :
>
> Sigh, it is useless to search for Fedora documentation on google ...
> anything but _current_ Docs will be found.
Welcome to the club. This has been a nuisance for a long time. I have made
several attempts, but so far without response.
>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:55AM -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > I will take that package because it is used by Fedora Design team for
> > conversion and some applications depend on it.
> Luya, if you'd also like some help, I'd be happy to co-maintain this with
> you. I find myself using it in v
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 06:14:44PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I know "feels responsive" is pretty subjective, so, maybe "switching tabs
> should be < 0.1 second" (from
> https://www.nngroup.com/articles/response-times-3-important-limits/).
Or, perhaps: better than some threshold for Phoronix T
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 08:09:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I think that those numbers (20GB+2GB) are quite reasonable for the
> stated purpose of "install and run successfully". I think that people
> know and understand that additional resources are required for
> additional thi
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Valentini writes:
> So, I wonder, should updates always be allowed to skip being in the
> "updates-testing" repository entirely? There's probably good reasons
> for it sometimes (for example, time-critical security updates, i.e.
> firefox, kernel, etc.), but in the general case,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Only Fedora Workstation edition explicitly states minimum hardware
> requirements: "Fedora requires a minimum of 20GB disk, 2GB RAM, to
> install and run successfully. Double those amounts is recommended."
> https://getfedora.org/en/wo
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:47:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> ...
> > So say there's this (real) dependency chain:
> >
> > ocaml -> ocaml-labltk -> ocaml-findlib -> ocaml-dune
> >
> > We set off building (eg) ocaml-findlib.ELN befo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20211013.0):
ID: 1028447 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1028447
Old failures (same test failed in Fed
Hi,
I just wanted to inform you, that cmake-3.22.0-rc1 [1] will hit Rawhide
within about the next hour. The upstream ChangeLog [2] doesn't show any
obvious breaking changes. If problems arise with your packages, feel
free to file bugs on RHBZ.
Thanks,
Björn
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211013.n.0):
ID: 1027965 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1027965
ID: 1028051 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 11:25 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
>
> Sigh, it is useless to search for Fedora documentation on google ...
> anything but _current_ Docs will be found.
>
> > Only Fedora Workstation edition explicitly states minimum hardware
> > requirements: "Fedora requires a minimum of 20GB
Sigh, it is useless to search for Fedora documentation on google ...
anything but _current_ Docs will be found.
> Only Fedora Workstation edition explicitly states minimum hardware
> requirements: "Fedora requires a minimum of 20GB disk, 2GB RAM, to
> install and run successfully. Double those amo
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20211013.0):
ID: 1028239 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/102
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:27:03 PM CEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, October 14, 2021 6:51:54 AM EDT Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
> >
> > I proposed to use libcurl-minimal and curl-minimal in minimal base images
>
OLD: Fedora-35-20211013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211014.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/206 (x86_64), 9/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same t
I was expecting some nice stickers too, but after your email, I was
intrigued. I just opened the package and woah!
Thanks everyone that made it possible!
Mikel
Hau idatzi du Michael J Gruber (m...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak
(2021 urr. 12, ar. (15:29)):
>
> Today that special package for N
Hello,
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 6:51:54 AM EDT Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
>
> I proposed to use libcurl-minimal and curl-minimal in minimal base images
> half a year ago but there has been no reply so far:
>
> https://pagure.i
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-10-14 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-10-14 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-10-14 12
On Thu, Oct 14 2021 at 01:28:23 PM +0200, Pavel Březina
wrote:
Do you have any proposals on the name?
To me, this change means that if you don't use authselect, you are
basically on your own and I'd like to stress this as much as possible.
Enforce Authselect Configuration Consistency?
_
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 07:44, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:53:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
> > been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
> > they're going to keep failing
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211014.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 198.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Hi Pavel,
On 10/14/21 12:57 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 10/13/21 3:17 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 10:22:14 AM +0200, Hans de Goede
>> wrote:
>>> Making what IMHO is a poor default of always using sssd everywhere
>>> hardcoded even deeper into Fedora seems like a bad
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...
> So say there's this (real) dependency chain:
>
> ocaml -> ocaml-labltk -> ocaml-findlib -> ocaml-dune
>
> We set off building (eg) ocaml-findlib.ELN before ocaml-labtk.ELN.
> However it's being built against the Rawhide version of oca
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:53:09PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> The ELN package builds for the recent OCaml 4.13 update have mostly
> been failing, over and over. I finally took a look at some today;
> they're going to keep failing until a human intervenes. Rebuilding
> against Rawhide packages wa
On 10/12/21 7:12 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This change is well-considered and includes detailed reasoning to
support it. Looks good to me.
I think the change proposal should be renamed, though, since authselect
would clearly not *actually* be mandatory. Of course you'll risk severe
break
On 10/12/21 5:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:33 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
=== 1. It is difficult to deliver updates to configurations ===
FIles /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/pam.d/* are distributed as
%config(noreplace) which means that they are configuration files and
are only i
On 10/13/21 3:17 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13 2021 at 10:22:14 AM +0200, Hans de Goede
wrote:
Making what IMHO is a poor default of always using sssd everywhere
hardcoded even deeper into Fedora seems like a bad idea to me.
I think we can fix this at the same time. Make authsel
Hi Zbyszek,
On Thursday, October 14, 2021 11:52:59 AM CEST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Hi Kamil and everyone,
>
> what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
I proposed to use libcurl-minimal and curl-minimal in minimal base images
half a year ago but there has bee
Hi Kamil and everyone,
what is the plan with introduction of libcurl-minimal in Fedora?
IIUC, libcurl and libcurl-minimal both have the same Provides, so
libcurl-minimal
can be used to satisfy automatically generated dependencies:
$ dnf repoquery --provides libcurl-minimal
libcurl = 7.78.0
Got mine now, so a big thanks for me too :)
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:35 AM Luna Jernberg
wrote:
> Mine is now on a Fedex truck from the airport here in Stockholm :)
> So thanks Fedora and Red Hat :) looking forward to see what it all is,
> when i get it later today
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211013.0):
ID: 1027310 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Mine is now on a Fedex truck from the airport here in Stockholm :)
So thanks Fedora and Red Hat :) looking forward to see what it all is, when
i get it later today
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 3:00 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 14
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211013.0):
ID: 1027294 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
48 matches
Mail list logo
