On 10/12/21 7:12 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
This change is well-considered and includes detailed reasoning to
support it. Looks good to me.
I think the change proposal should be renamed, though, since authselect
would clearly not *actually* be mandatory. Of course you'll risk severe
breakage if you turn it off and edit these low-level configurations
directly, but that is really no different than it was before.
Do you have any proposals on the name?
To me, this change means that if you don't use authselect, you are
basically on your own and I'd like to stress this as much as possible.
But yes, it is still possible to opt-out. However, the package
maintainers won't (should not) care about non-authselect configuration
anymore.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
