Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu!
It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package
could use more maintainer attention. Pull requests tend not to get a reply
from the maintainers, so in the end proven packagers end up merging stuff
[1,2], for better or worse,
Meeting summary
---
* #2660 F35 incomplete changes: Code complete (testable) deadline
(zbyszek, 19:18:40)
- GNU Toolchain update (gcc 11, glibc 2.34, binutils 2.37, gdb 10.2)
(zbyszek, 19:19:23)
(Seems mostly done, we'll wait for updates.)
- CompilerPolicy Change (zbyszek, 19:
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Clou
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210814.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210816.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 81
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages:1.32
On 8/16/21 3:29 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:22 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> That does appear to be the case, it's still pending:
>>
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-de38a77e64
>
> It's not just taking long, it's stuck. It even gives you a hint
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 11:22 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> That does appear to be the case, it's still pending:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-de38a77e64
It's not just taking long, it's stuck. It even gives you a hint as to
*why* it's still pending:
"This update cannot b
On 8/16/21 2:36 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi Orion,
>
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 8:17 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> I've just submitted the updates for F35 and F36. There are a few
>> packages have failed to build (mainly due to arm or other package issues
>> - not many due to these updates it seem
Hi,
On 8/16/21 12:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:
Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB
memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see
40GB memory
Hi Orion,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 8:17 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I've just submitted the updates for F35 and F36. There are a few
> packages have failed to build (mainly due to arm or other package issues
> - not many due to these updates it seems) and I'll be working on them
> and/or filing b
On 16/08/2021 22:03, Julian Sikorski wrote:
%global build_cflags %(echo $RPM_OPT_FLAGS | sed "s@-g@-g1@")
%global build_cxxflags %(echo $RPM_OPT_FLAGS | sed "s@-g@-g1@")
Changing optflags is better, because it will affect all build flags at
once: C, C++, Fortran, etc.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/45 (x86_64)
ID: 949838 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/949838
ID: 949844 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/94984
On 16/08/2021 21:14, Julian Sikorski wrote:
mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and
disk space usage.
%global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-g /-g1 /')
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:33, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:32 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
will fail due
Hello Pavel,
Thank you for your thoughts. It strikes me that perhaps what you're
advising me to do, is likely what I was wanting to do in the first
place. I certainly don't feel dissatisfied being a non-packager in
Fedora land, and I am probably a bit guilty of exageration of the
difficulties on th
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:32 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
> >> will fail due to relocation overfl
W dniu 16.08.2021 o 21:24, Neal Gompa pisze:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
Hi,
mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and
disk space usage. Right now this is taken car
Now compilation failing with error: "Error: GPG check FAILED".
https://pastebin.com/HNGz7N8A
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:14 PM Julian Sikorski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
> will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and
> disk space usage. Right now this is taken care of by editing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS:
> http
Hi,
mame needs to have the symbols level reduced to -g1 or the compilation
will fail due to relocation overflows and generally excessive memory and
disk space usage. Right now this is taken care of by editing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mame/blob/30873dfe8d2ab851bb018b7a
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, Brian C. Lane wrote:
There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been
trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail.
I've even made and tested a PR for it here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2
This effect
Hello everyone,
For additional visibility: there is currently an open update to bump
Puppet from version 5.5 to 7.7 in Fedora 34. While this can be
considered a big change (especially since the config directory changes),
it should be ok. Puppet 5.5 is completely broken under Ruby 3 and only
P
There's a bug with pycdlib that has been fixed upstream. I've been
trying to get the author/maintainer's attention but to no avail.
I've even made and tested a PR for it here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycdlib/pull-request/2
This effects mkksiso and livemedia-creator (when using v
Hi folks.
For about the sixth time this year, interdependent NSS and Firefox
updates have been submitted to Bodhi separately:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6fcdbc958b
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0446705d87
PLEASE stop doing this. I have been
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 1:38 PM Stephen Snow wrote:
> Hello Dan,
> Thank you for reaching out with your response. I have to admit, I was
> in a provocotive mood the other day. I had solved a problem for a
> customer that had been worked on unsuccessfully by a local competitor
> for three weeks. I
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021, at 6:43 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> Mark kojid as non-killable by setting its OOM score to -1000? Adding
> swap might also help, but then the build is by no means guaranteed to
> finish in a reasonable amount of time.
If Koji wasn't a clustered container system itse
On 8/15/21 3:41 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 08. 21 4:13, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Or perhaps at least a statement that support for it is "best effort" only to
>> make it more acceptable to ExcludeArch it on some packages.
>
> Due to the nature of our dependency chain, this would be just slow
Hi everyone,
Please find the logs from today's meeting below. We will meet again in
2 weeks, at the same time (1300 UTC).
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-08-16/neurofedora.2021-08-16-13.01.html
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2021-08-16/neurofedo
Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 16th
August (today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Libera.chat). The
meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can
join us over:
IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neur
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 11:57:57 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I wonder what are the requirements for using Copr? FAS account, but is there
> anything else? I think that maintaining packages in Copr for a while just to
> gain experience/confidence could deserve better promotion.
I think an FAS is prett
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.libera.chat.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2021-08-16 19:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be dis
I wonder what are the requirements for using Copr? FAS account, but is
there anything else? I think that maintaining packages in Copr for a
while just to gain experience/confidence could deserve better promotion.
BTW there is also Fedora Join SIG which focuses on improving of
newcomers experie
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210815.0):
ID: 949431 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On 8/16/21 12:25 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 06:14:57PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:23:18PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim via devel
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:56:39AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 8/10/21 8
On 15. 08. 21 2:02, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello. I've tried to run a rawhide mockbuild on Fedoa 33 and I get GPG
failures. It worked yesterday...
Solution:
Update to mock-core-configs >= 35-1:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VVIUKZLIYMX322HOC3
On 16. 08. 21 0:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 11:43:48AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 08. 21 18:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It makes me wonder if we should consider letting 32bit arm go...
(insert pitchforks and torches).
Let's propose it and see what people say? As a package
35 matches
Mail list logo
