On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 13:55, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >>
> >> Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a):
> >> > Over the next two days we're rolling out
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 12:28, Peter Oliver wrote:
> > IMHO even then we would need the default "fedora" image to be the
> > minimal one, as that's what a casual user will compare, unless they
> > happen to know "fedora-minimal" exists.
>
> I notice that fedora-minimal is absent from Docker Hub, a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1956892
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1959040
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1957783
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947703
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-generators-1.13-1.fc35 |perl-generators-1.13-1.fc35
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong
> anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone
> can still take up auctex, fix the ema
19.05.2021, 23:37, "Adam Williamson" :On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 15:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: 2. How can we best sensibly tweak things so we don't gate on Rawhide updates that *do* get marked as critpath? I'm going to think about #2 now.So all the clever ways I can think of to do this for now
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 15:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> 2. How can we best sensibly tweak things so we don't gate on Rawhide
> updates that *do* get marked as critpath?
>
> I'm going to think about #2 now.
So all the clever ways I can think of to do this for now kinda suck, so
I went with
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 15:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 22:54 +0100, Pete Walter wrote:
> > > I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended
> > > up waiving
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproje
19.05.2021, 22:59, "Adam Williamson" :On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 22:54 +0100, Pete Walter wrote: I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended up waiving https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After a bunch of searching I found https://openqa.fedoraprojec
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 22:54 +0100, Pete Walter wrote:
> > I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended
> > up waiving
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After
> > a bunch of searchin
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 22:54 +0100, Pete Walter wrote:
> I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended
> up waiving
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After
> a bunch of searching I found https://openqa.fedoraproject.org but
> there was no indica
I waited over an hour on openQA test results that never came. Ended up waiving https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-8cdffadc43. After a bunch of searching I found https://openqa.fedoraproject.org but there was no indication that it had even started running the tests for this update.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950383
--- Comment #4 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1749304
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
per
On 5/19/21 4:13 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
FYI we are using zram in other Fedora editions. zswap is different.
Sorry, got my names mixed up. Thanks Michael!
Joe
--
Joe Doss
j...@solidadmin.com
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Wed, May 19 2021 at 03:46:48 PM -0500, Joe Doss
wrote:
Even in today's FCOS WG
meeting I brought up adding in zswap to FCOS and it is shelved until
Kubernetes adds for support swap enabled systems.
FYI we are using zram in other Fedora editions. zswap is different.
Michael
___
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong anyways, so
> I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone can still take
> up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend on texlive-preview
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna
wrote:
I think this is the fundamental difference here, Fedora CoreOS does
not have a version number. It has 3 streams, stable, testing and
next, these streams are based on a version of Fedora Linux but that
should just be a detail that most end use
On 5/19/21 04:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:04:08AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 16:40, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
The container runtime in the host OS will have configured most mount
points before the container start
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:26 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> Due to the recent changes[1] in Freenode IRC network, I think it's time
> to speed-up switching all the Fedora official channels to the Matrix
> network.
>
As long as they have an IRC bridge, cool. Otherwise I am f
On 19.05.2021 20:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, I think we are just going to have to move the irc side, bridge to
matrix and slowly encourage people to move over. It's going to be years
at least before we could look and see if IRC isn't worth bridging
anymore. IMHO.
Then someone need to resolve thi
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> > spec
> > actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
> > is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
> > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview
> > Last metadata expira
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:57:03AM +1000, David Airlie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 04:59:50PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/18/2021 4:44 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log
> > > >
> > > > cd
> > > > /builddir/buil
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 4:51 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 04:59:50PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 5/18/2021 4:44 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log
> > >
> > > cd
> > > /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-Validat
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 04:59:50PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/18/2021 4:44 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3814/68223814/build.log
> >
> > cd
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/Vulkan-ValidationLayers-sdk-1.2.176.1/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/layers
> > && /usr/b
TL;DR: glibc 2.34 snapshots are coming. libpthread as a separate library
creates problems, so we are removing it. There may be some
hickups. Full updates with “dnf update” are recommended.
We expect that we will soon be able to import glibc upstream snapshots
regularly into Fedora 35 and CentOS
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:27:31PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all!
> >
> > Due to the recent changes[1] in Freenode IRC network, I think it's time
> > to speed-up switching all the Fedora official channels to the Matri
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:38:58PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Some strange stuff!
Yeah. You'll probably want to start by filtering by hits specifically to a
repo. Perhaps `repo_tag like "updates-released-f__"`. Otherwise you get
Fedora Linux and EPEL all mixed together.
--
Matth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962200
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Timm Bäder from comment #2)
> It is incorrect for package to use double-underscore macros generally and
> %__make in BuildRequires is also incorrect, see the discussion at the end of
> https:
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> Due to the recent changes[1] in Freenode IRC network, I think it's time
> to speed-up switching all the Fedora official channels to the Matrix
> network.
>
> [1]: https://www.kline.sh/
>
It's already moving as fast
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:06 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
llvm10orphan, sergesanspaille 1 weeks
> ago
> llvm9.0 jistone, orphan, tstellar5 weeks
> ago
I have taken these two.
Jens
___
d
Hello all!
Due to the recent changes[1] in Freenode IRC network, I think it's time
to speed-up switching all the Fedora official channels to the Matrix
network.
[1]: https://www.kline.sh/
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
d
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210515.0):
ID: 889978 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/889978
Soft failed openQA tests:
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Extract` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Create EPEL8 package
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Extract/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- pe
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:26:26PM +0200, Nikola Forró wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've rebased libcgroup in Rawhide to the new upstream release,
> libcgroup 2.0, with initial cgroupv2 support:
> https://github.com/libcgroup/libcgroup/releases/tag/v2.0
>
> There are no incompatible ABI changes, SONAME of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207174
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Version|33
Hello,
I've rebased libcgroup in Rawhide to the new upstream release,
libcgroup 2.0, with initial cgroupv2 support:
https://github.com/libcgroup/libcgroup/releases/tag/v2.0
There are no incompatible ABI changes, SONAME of the library remains
"libcgroup.so.1".
This should make libcgroup relevant
pghmcfc merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-Socket-INET6` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Patch for bad code in test
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-INET6/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list
Pretty tired, but not really doing anything so decided to show up
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:18 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-19 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/India
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962200
Timm Bäder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@tib.bs
--- Comment #2 from Timm Bäd
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:22:37AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6].
> Are the count stats visible somewhere?
Yes, although just the aggregated count data without analysis. I'm w
On Wed, May 19, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> It's not like making changes and breaking upgrades is acceptable in
> Fedora Linux either. It's just that the Fedora CoreOS WG has not
> participated in the main development process and rolled back changes
> instead of adapting to them, whi
Hi,I am in the process of updating icu from 67.1 to 69.1 in rawhide. This comes with a soname bump, but as usual, I'm including a compat package providing the old soname to not break the world while the rebuilds are in progress, so no rawhide breakage is expected. I'll work on the rebuilds over the
Eh, I though initially that OPAM is a new abbreviation of *O*rphaned
*PA*ckages looking for new *M*aintainers
Anyway, rubygem-tilt does not depend on rubygem-maruku anymore:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-bdc794da78
Vít
Dne 19. 05. 21 v 10:39 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> spec
> actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
> is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
> $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:29 ago on Tue 18 May 2021 11:25:34 PM
> BST.
> R-ti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950383
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|NOTAB
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:18:21AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
> >
> > You are kindly invited to the meeting:
> >Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-19 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> > America/Indiana/Indianapolis
> >At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950383
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 09:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6].
> >
> > Are the count stats visible somewhere?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961842
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.32 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fe
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:45 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 06:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>> Dnia Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe napisał(a):
>> > Over the next two days we're rolling out the first Fedora 34 based
>> > Fedora CoreOS into the `stable` stre
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961842
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.32 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/4
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207174
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Fl
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 09:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6].
>
> Are the count stats visible somewhere?
>
For FCOS this change is not yet enabled, it is coming in a few months (mor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207174
--- Comment #13 from Michal Josef Spacek ---
Good catch. I totally missed that missing "close($second)" :-/
Ok, cannot help.
"ReuseAddr => 1," helps, great result. And this is right fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
Dne 19. 05. 21 v 6:46 Michal Schorm napsal(a):
* RPMLint includes_many more checks_! Nearly all of the generally
However I always have a hard time understanding what the issue caught
by RPMLint actually is.
I would like to see some library of the checks with the explanation of
what it is, why it
On 18.05.21 22:04, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> php-opencloud-openstack
I'll take this, I'll need it for nextcloud unbundling.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Cod
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 07:51, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
>
> I asked this question a while ago on the packaging mailing list [0], but
> did not receive any replies. Let me try again here on devel with more
> subscribers:
>
> During the package review of qvge [1], the following question came up:
> Are
> IMHO even then we would need the default "fedora" image to be the
> minimal one, as that's what a casual user will compare, unless they
> happen to know "fedora-minimal" exists.
I notice that fedora-minimal is absent from Docker Hub, and outdated on
Quay.io, by the way.
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-19 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
> More information available at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210518.0):
ID: 889950 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/889950
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests comp
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210518.0):
ID: 889934 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, May 18, 2021 22:04:32 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-pyriemann neuro-sig, orphan1 weeks ago
I've taken this up as it's a neuro-sig package, and upstream is active.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject
I'll take kjots (upstream seems to be active as well)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
- Original Message -
> From: "Miro Hrončok"
> To: "undisclosed-recipients:"@fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 10:14:41 PM
> Subject: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six wee
- Original Message -
> From: "Miro Hrončok"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Kaleb Keithley"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 12:26:54 AM
> Subject: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
>
> On 19. 05. 21 0:17, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> >
> >
> > On
* Peter Robinson:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:52 PM Arjun Shankar wrote:
>>
>> Hello, devel and arm lists!
>>
>> We recently ran into a testsuite failure when building glibc for
>> Rawhide on armv7hl:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951492
>>
>> The test program experienced a hang
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:04:08AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 16:40, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> > Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> >
> > > The container runtime in the host OS will have configured most mount
> > > points before the container starts. It would be relatively
V Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:55:31AM -0500, Justin Forbes napsal(a):
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:38:29AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 08:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > You reported my complaints as:
> > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4219. Thanks!
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:52 PM Arjun Shankar wrote:
>
> Hello, devel and arm lists!
>
> We recently ran into a testsuite failure when building glibc for
> Rawhide on armv7hl:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951492
>
> The test program experienced a hang after a thread was cancelled
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210518.0):
ID: 889694 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:37:27PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> - DNF Count Me support for Fedora CoreOS [6].
Are the count stats visible somewhere?
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 16:40, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > The container runtime in the host OS will have configured most mount
> > points before the container starts. It would be relatively uncommon
> > for processes inside the container image to need to mount addi
76 matches
Mail list logo
