Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1 compose check report

-20201023.n.0): ID: 705845 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/705845 ID: 705850 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/705850 ID: 705853 Test

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201023.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 51 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

[Bug 1890315] EPEL8 Request: perl-Business-ISBN-Data

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890315 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedo

[Bug 1890598] EPEL8 Request: perl-Prima

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890598 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedo

Re: Has glibc just removed some symbols?

Has this been fixed in rawhide yet? I'm still getting this when running fedora-review: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in from dnf.cli import main File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in import dnf.base File "/usr/lib/

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:27 PM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the b

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 22:42, Neal Gompa wrote: [...] > And there is *nothing* that stops the Change process for working in a > rolling context other than people don't think of doing it. > > There's actually nothing wrong with this idea in itself, because at > the crux of it is that there i

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 19:06, Clement Verna wrote: > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > > > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision

Re: Non-responsive maintainer johnp for python-ldap package request

On 10/23/20 6:13 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On pe, 23 loka 2020, John Palmieri wrote: I haven’t been a Linux dev for some time now. I can’t even figure out how to log into Fas anymore otherwise I would help out. Thank you for the response, John. Does it mean that I should proceed with the n

[Test-Announce] 2020-10-26 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2020-10-26 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a few weeks, and Fedora 33 is done, so let's get together and plan next steps. If

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 4:05 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

Hi, Chris Adams wrote: > Although: now that I look at the ISO structure with isoinfo, it does > appear that the files are not actually duplicated ECMA-119 (ISO 9660 for free) allows the equivalent to hardlinking by 6.5.1 Relation to File Sections ... A File Section may be part of more than

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

Hi, Neal Gompa wrote: > Could we just drop syslinux/isolinux and use GRUB there? Other > distributions have done that I understand Ubuntu did it just yesterday. https://releases.ubuntu.com/20.10/ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso The lesson from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/188

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:56:11AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:18 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > > > Although: now that I look at the ISO structure with isoinfo, it does > > appear that the files are not actually duplicated - they

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 19:55, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >> > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _earl

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 20:36, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > And as I've mentioned before on this thread, we're trying to figure out > how to drop that change in earlier

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On 2020-10-23 17:56, Chris Murphy wrote: That's curious, when I mount the server dvd ISO, those files have different inode numbers. I can't tell from the isoinfo man page what the numbers in brackets mean. Even if inodes are different, data blocks can be reused. The filesystem is readonly so

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 5:55 AM, Clement Verna wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > s

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 8:01 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > [...] >> You can blame me for being not clear enough, if you want, but I'd >> rather move on and use the current GCC11 work as an example which >> shows the real power of

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:07 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early >> > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 17:20, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early > > development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it. > > I except (and accept) that most of the development work

Re: Non-responsive maintainer johnp for python-ldap package request

On pe, 23 loka 2020, John Palmieri wrote: I haven’t been a Linux dev for some time now. I can’t even figure out how to log into Fas anymore otherwise I would help out. Thank you for the response, John. Does it mean that I should proceed with the non-responsive process right away so that FESCO

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:33 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:39 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I'm not sure it's possible (still) for UEFI and BIOS GRUB to co-exist > > on one media, hence using isolinux to boot BIOS. > Could we just drop syslinux/isolinux and use GRUB there? Oth

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:18 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > Although: now that I look at the ISO structure with isoinfo, it does > appear that the files are not actually duplicated - they are pointing to > the same sectors. Reading the genisoimage man page, it

Fedora-33-20201023.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-33-20201022.n.0): ID: 705148 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedorapro

Re: How to test kernel patch?

On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 10:04 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I've messed with a lot of packages but the kernel isn't one of them. > I have a new HP ENVY x360 laptop that seems to suffer from the lack > of S3 suspend support and I'd like to test the following patch and > see if it improves anything. >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 2:45 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Sorry, but you just need to accept the fact that some _early development_ work in Fedora can happen without your decision on it. I except (and accept) that most of the development work in Fedora happens without my decision on it. I would like y

How to test kernel patch?

I've messed with a lot of packages but the kernel isn't one of them. I have a new HP ENVY x360 laptop that seems to suffer from the lack of S3 suspend support and I'd like to test the following patch and see if it improves anything. https://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=160344026323855&q=mbox Any ti

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:39 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:35 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, Brian C. Lane said: > > > I tried :) It ends up that there are users who boot the install.img with > > > fips=1 which means it needs to be present. It was removed

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:17:52AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Well, there is value in having the vmlinuz/initrd.img directly available > on the ISO (for people setting up PXE boot for example). I don't see > any reason for there to be an images/pxelinux directory though - you can > just get the s

Re: F34 Change proposal: Compress Kernel Firmware (Self-Contained Change)

Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 5:35 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Brian C. Lane said: > > > I tried :) It ends up that there are users who boot the install.img with > > > fips=1 which means it needs to be present. It was removed for a bit, and > > >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 14:45, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > You can blame me for being not clear enough, if you want, but I'd > rather move on and use the current GCC11 work as an example which > shows the real power of the ELN proposal, and the real benefit for > Fedora which it brings

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Hi! On Thursday, 22 October 2020 at 14:27, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. Was this discussed pub

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201023.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20201022.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201023.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 1 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Non-responsive maintainer johnp for python-ldap package request

Hi, I am trying to initiate a non-responsive maintainer process for johnp for package python-ldap. Following the process defined at[1], I filed the following bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890982 Prior to that, I tried to communicate with maintainers of python-ldap packa

Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 21 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 91/181 (x86_64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-202

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

- Original Message - > From: "Aleksandra Fedorova" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 2:45:41 PM > Subject: Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot > ahead of Rawhide > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:40 PM Mir

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:40 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/23/20 11:52 AM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 1

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201023.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201022.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201023.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 86 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 294.69 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 14:28, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, all, > > this is the informational message, no action required. > > Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to > switch ELN buildroot to use GCC11 ahead of Fedora Rawhide. > > Though ELN is defined as the buil

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Friday, 23 October 2020 at 11:52, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: [...] > > > I'll reiterate: > > > > > > We don't want to fork packages from the Fedora Rawhide. We don't > > > want to provide e

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 11:52 AM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201023.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

Dne 22. 10. 20 v 18:33 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, Vit. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: I was asking for ELN branch for ages and it was always denied and there you h

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:12 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10/22/20 6:33 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 10/22/20 2:51 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> Hi, Vit. > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 2:37 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/23/20 10:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:37:29AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: But I very much agree that GCC should be moving into rawhide earlier than has been done in the past.  In an ideal world it would have gone in just after F33 branched and updated regularly

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201023.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201021.0): ID: 704654 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:37:29AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > But I very much agree that GCC should be moving into rawhide earlier > > than has been done in the past.  In an ideal world it would have gone in > > just after F33 branched and updated regularly. > > Big +1 on that. > > Right

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 7:28 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: I do not think the Fedora Change process applies to parts of %{?rhel} conditionals that are inactive in Fedora. Except that they apply in Fedora ELN now. And since this *will* affect Fedora contributors, I belive that it should follow Fedora processes

Re: Announcement: unixODBC - moving unversioned plugins and libraries

Hi Michal, there was already a discussion in email thread with the maintainers of packages which depend on unixODBC or unixODBC-devel according to these changes. I did not planned to submit any PRs but the maintainers should be informed about this change. The results as you see it is an end produc

Re: [ELN] gcc is going to be updated to gcc11 in the ELN buildroot ahead of Rawhide

On 10/22/20 5:06 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/22/20 6:53 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 8:27 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Hi, all, this is the informational message, no action required. Upon agreement between gcc maintainers and ELN SIG we would like to switch ELN buildroot to