These updates, along with a couple of others I submitted 12h ago, just
appeared in my local mirror. Bodhi still shows everything as
transitioning from pending to testing and I never got a notification
about them having moved to testing. Side effect from the data center
move?
___
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2020-06-18 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2020-06-18 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2020-06-18
Hi,
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:40 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Has anyone in the nodejs SIG given any thought to picking any of
> these up? Do we need some kind of Stewardship SIG-like effort to try
> and improve the state of the node.js ecosystem in Fedora? It's
> probably no secret that a lot of node
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:05 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I didn't get any response from the EPEL list so forwarding here since the
> change was discussed here anyway...
> ---
>
> So with the discussion about moving to zram for swap on Fedora I wondered if
> it was worth taking a look at for my C
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:08 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> > @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> > changed?
>
> Nothing has changed th
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
> @fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
> changed?
Nothing has changed there.
You can make a @fedoraproject.org account, but without an
ov
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:04:57PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I didn't get any response from the EPEL list so forwarding here since the
> change was discussed here anyway...
> ---
>
> So with the discussion about moving to zram for swap on Fedora I wondered
> if it was worth taking a look at for
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 20:47, Igor Raits
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 20:38 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> > Howdy everyone!
> >
> > Some time ago we discussed the misuse of the make %{?_smp_mflags}
> > construct
> > and that one should switch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 20:38 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> Howdy everyone!
>
> Some time ago we discussed the misuse of the make %{?_smp_mflags}
> construct
> and that one should switch to %build_make. I tried that and all of my
> COPR
> builds failed
Howdy everyone!
Some time ago we discussed the misuse of the make %{?_smp_mflags} construct
and that one should switch to %build_make. I tried that and all of my COPR
builds failed completely. Here's a log from one of them:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/andymenderunix/7kaa/fed
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 07:10, Igor Raits
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 02:21 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > == Summary ==
> > > %cmake macro will be adjusted (-B
> > > parameter)
> > > to use separate build folder (alr
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 14:05, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I didn't get any response from the EPEL list so forwarding here since the
> change was discussed here anyway...
The EPEL list really isn't for these sorts of OS level discussions..
most of the people on it are usually php/perl/python level to
I didn't get any response from the EPEL list so forwarding here since the
change was discussed here anyway...
---
So with the discussion about moving to zram for swap on Fedora I wondered
if it was worth taking a look at for my CentOS 8 machine.
I noticed that there was a build in Koji but it was
I remember that some time ago we were told not to use the
@fedoraproject.org in bugzilla, can't recall why exactly. Has this
changed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:37:42AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:15:17PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > > >Why aren't the
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 6:30 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jared K. Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> >>
> >> So... this is a lot of node.js packages, and I haven't really seen any
> >> discussion of this on the lists. And at
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>>
>> So... this is a lot of node.js packages, and I haven't really seen any
>> discussion of this on the lists. And at least some of these are possibly
>> important for other nodejs pack
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:49 PM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> # DataCentre Move Update: 2020-06-17
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I hope you are all having a good week! I would like to give you some
> updates on the Data Centre Move project that some members of the CPE
> team have been involved in over the last f
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:41 AM Igor Raits
wrote:
>
> %if (0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel}) <= 8 || (0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} <= 32)
>
Yes, I have written such spec file lines, and while
they are correct, they tend to be ugly to parse for
humans.
While I know it is personal preference, I tend to
prefe
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:03 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > The person proposing this Change should supply some video showcasing
> > > this, or a very detailed descriptio
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:09 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 01:59:48PM +0200, Michael J. Baars wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since it's awfully quiet on the initscripts-devel mailing list.
>
> But why this email? The log you presented shows:
>
> a) distccd not starting because o
# DataCentre Move Update: 2020-06-17
Hi everyone,
I hope you are all having a good week! I would like to give you some
updates on the Data Centre Move project that some members of the CPE
team have been involved in over the last few months.
As you are probably aware at this point, the Fedora har
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23:30PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> The solution to this problem should be quite evident and that is to archive
> the "retired" components as flatpaks ( if the component is a desktop app )
> or a as container ( if it's a server application or application stack )
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Dan Horák wrote:
"J. Scheurich" wrote:
Hi,
I updated white_dune with creating a source.rpm,
$ fedpkg clone wdune
$ fedpkg import source.rpm
$ fedpkg commit
$ fedpkg push
$ fedpkg build
but i get the following problem
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
If you take a look inside the root.log of the build task here:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4647/45824647/root.log, you
will see the actual error that is being reported. It appears that a
depoendency of the package (aqsis-core) cannot be installed due to an issue
with how it is pa
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:03:07 +0200
"J. Scheurich" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated white_dune with creating a source.rpm,
>
> $ fedpkg clone wdune
> $ fedpkg import source.rpm
> $ fedpkg commit
> $ fedpkg push
> $ fedpkg build
>
> but i get the following problem
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
Hi,
I updated white_dune with creating a source.rpm,
$ fedpkg clone wdune
$ fedpkg import source.rpm
$ fedpkg commit
$ fedpkg push
$ fedpkg build
but i get the following problem
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45824536 ->
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=
On 17. 06. 20 14:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Quoting the original email which started this sub-thread:
Dne 15. 06. 20 v 22:10 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
We install/keep fedora-repos-modular by default, users (admins) can
uninstall it if desired. No defaults are changed
How you manage to have it instal
Dne 16. 06. 20 v 14:46 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:03 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> The person proposing this Change should supply some video showcasing
>> this, or a very detailed description, otherwise people will have very
>> varying ideas of how this works and looks.
Dne 16. 06. 20 v 14:38 Christopher Engelhard napsal(a):
> I can't speak to the implementation of this, but I am in favour of the
> approach in general, with one caveat: I think it is important to
> implement this in a way that makes it possible for users to keep
> *individual* retired packages aro
Dne 17. 06. 20 v 9:15 Till Hofmann napsal(a):
>
> On 6/16/20 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Also, I wonder what is wrong with "dnf autoremove", which is supposed to
>> remove unused leaf packages, which were not explicitly installed?
> On my system, it removed grub2-efi and made the system unboota
Dne 17. 06. 20 v 0:21 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 16. 06. 20 11:57, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Not mentioned that weak dependencies are disabled in Mock.
>
> I don't understand why would the user need fedora-repos-modular
> automatically pulled into mock when they install fedora-repos there.
> Could y
On 17. 06. 20 12:01, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
== How To Test ==
Install Fedora 33 (any edition or flavor), check that modular repos
are still installed and enabled by default.
Update to Fedora 33 (from Fedora 31 or 32), check that modular repos
are still installed and enabled by default.
Check
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 3:48 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > All retired packages are obsoleted by `fedora-retired-packages`.
> >
>
> This whole process is un
> == How To Test ==
> Install Fedora 33 (any edition or flavor), check that modular repos
> are still installed and enabled by default.
>
> Update to Fedora 33 (from Fedora 31 or 32), check that modular repos
> are still installed and enabled by default.
>
> Check that you can remove the fedora-rep
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:03 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > The person proposing this Change should supply some video showcasing
> > this, or a very detailed description, otherwise people will have very
> > varying ideas of how this works an
On 6/17/20 1:19 AM, Carl George wrote:
> I just orphaned the python-mitogen package. I packaged it for my last
> job but I no longer use it and I'm not interested in maintaining it
> anymore. As best I can tell, nothing else in the distribution
> requires or build requires it. It's up for grabs
On 6/17/20 11:03 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> Zdenek have kind of question: why there are so many patches in the
> hplip package?
> Is it any problem with accepting Fedora patches by source tree maintainer?
Yes, it is - HP upstream is unresponsive in most bugfix cases.
> Is there any git or other
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 14:09, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm HPLIP maintainer in Fedora and I would like to ask *the users which
> have HP printers which needed their HP plugin to test the scratch build*
> of new hplip.
>
> HPLIP released a new version 3.20.6, where most models, which pre
Hi Tomasz,
thank you for testing!
Unfortunately, IMO hpcups still loads the plugin... I checked the code
and hpcups doesn't look into models.dat - it loads the plugin either
way, entry in models.dat seems to be checked only during print queue
installation :( .
I have the same experience with sca
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 05:15:17PM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:10 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Christopher wrote:
> > >Why aren't the packager accounts linked to their FAS account alias?
> > >[1]fa...@fedorapro
On 6/16/20 9:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Also, I wonder what is wrong with "dnf autoremove", which is supposed to
> remove unused leaf packages, which were not explicitly installed?
On my system, it removed grub2-efi and made the system unbootable. So
I'm not sure running this as part of the sys
On 6/17/20 8:41 AM, Igor Raits wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 01:38 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
James Cassell wrote:
If you're doing this, might I suggest reversing the condition so
the new
way is in the "else" part, hence "default"?
The problem i
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 03.41.09 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> CMake themselves do not recommend doing in-source builds (and they've
> already warned that this will eventually stop working). Meson doesn't
> even permit it. These days, Autotools is the weird exception that
> mostly mandates in-source bu
44 matches
Mail list logo
