Fedora testing-20180831.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) ID: 272400 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/272400 Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-co

Re: OpenBLAS: link with which library?

Jerry James wrote: > If I understand correctly, the default is a library that cannot > tolerate multiple threads, uses 32-bit integers in the interface, and > does not use "a symbol name suffix", whatever that means. Hmmm, normally, the serial version is not itself parallelized but should tolerat

Re: Headsup: dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 is missing systemd dbus.service file, breaking almost everything

Den tors 30 aug. 2018 kl 15:21 skrev Hans de Goede : > > Hi All, > > Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the > dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service > file, breaking almost everything. > > Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the > dbus.socket

Re: zram-generator

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:16:25PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > [2] https://github.com/systemd/zram-generator > > Oh... > > ExecStart=sh -c 'echo {disksize} >/sys/block/%i/disksize' > > It's necessary to directly w

Re: [modularity] Managing module lifecycles — let's talk!

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:01 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > Would it be necessary for us to pick one or the other here? IOW, > > > whether the maintainer picked a specific date or a release, the EOL > > > would resolve to a date. If

Re: [modularity] Managing module lifecycles — let's talk!

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > Would it be necessary for us to pick one or the other here? IOW, > > whether the maintainer picked a specific date or a release, the EOL > > would resolve to a date. If they pick none, or explicitly choose > > 'rawhide,' then the art

OpenBLAS: link with which library?

Bugs have been filed asking packagers to build with openblas instead of atlas. But there are multiple openblas libraries. I can link with any of the following: -lopenblas (openblas-serial) -lopenblas64 (openblas-serial64) -lopenblas64_ (openblas-serial64_) -lopenblaso (openblas-openmp)

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

> Is this really appropriate for (usually small) scripts which are known > to work with Python 2 *and* 3? Why can't we use /usr/bin/python for > such scripts? What shall the package depend on? Python 3 or Python 2? If you know the script works with 3, use python3 shebang. Explicitly. This is

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

> Dne 31.8.2018 v 13:41 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > And what about not adding such macros at all? After while, the > brp-mangle-shebangs will become unmaintainable full of exceptions and > moreover you'll have hard time to get rid of such macros in the future, > because of backward compatibility.

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

> Il giorno ven 31 ago 2018 alle ore 13:18 Miro Hrončok > > waf script contains unversioned python shebangs, but it's usually > provided by upstream developer,so instead of patching it I prefer > calling python2 explicitly. > I don't know if the new f30 build system checks this too, I remember >

Re: zram-generator

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:22:43PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/24/2018 07:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > > Why not Haskell? > > > > > > Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not > >

Re: zram-generator

On 08/24/2018 07:42 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:11:28PM -, Jeff Johnson wrote: Why not Haskell? Seriously: you provide no reason for rust other than that "C is not attractive". C is surely a reliable implementation language for long running system serv

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 08/22/2018 08:58 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error == Summary == The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an ambiguous python shebang, such as #!/usr/

Re: zram-generator

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > [2] https://github.com/systemd/zram-generator Oh... ExecStart=sh -c 'echo {disksize} >/sys/block/%i/disksize' It's necessary to directly write to /sys. We have zramctl(8) everywhere... Karel -- Karel Zak

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

Dne 31.8.2018 v 13:41 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 31.8.2018 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 31.8.2018 09:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton >> > wrote: >>> >>>     >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_s

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

Il giorno ven 31 ago 2018 alle ore 13:18 Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > On 31.8.2018 08:22, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > Can we explicitly call python2? > > Instead of calling > > ./waf ... > > which contains the unversioned shebang, we call > > python2 waf ... ? > > You can. This has nothing to do with

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 31.8.2018 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31.8.2018 09:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error     == Summary ==     The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 31.8.2018 09:05, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton > wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error == Summary == The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot policy script

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On 31.8.2018 08:22, Guido Aulisi wrote: Il giorno mer 22 ago 2018 alle ore 21:53 Ben Cotton ha scritto: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error == Summary == The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot policy script will be changed to make the bui

Re: Fedora 30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Make ambiguous python shebangs error

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:02 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Make_ambiguous_python_shebangs_error > > == Summary == > The /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-mangle-shebangs buildroot > policy script will be changed to make the build fail when it sees an > ambiguous python sheb