On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 5:01 PM Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > > Would it be necessary for us to pick one or the other here? IOW,
> > > whether the maintainer picked a specific date or a release, the EOL
> > > would resolve to a date. If they pick none, or explicitly choose
> > > 'rawhide,' then the artifact is essentially on a rolling window.
> > Yeah... that's a good point. Maybe having the ability to specify EOL as a
> > specific Fedora release or a date could be a good way forward. I like
> that.
>
>
> I don't think we should use "rawhide" to mean "rolling updates", because it
> also has the implication of "project devel stream".
>

Just to make sure we're on the same page: I was talking about specifying an
EOL field, not a stream name. Is that what you mean, too?

>
> I know this was talked about a long time ago, but I'm not sure how it came
> down in practice: what's the tooling and workflow for moving users to a new
> stream when a stream reaches EOL?
>
> For example, Rawtherapee, which has a fairly traditional major/minor
> versioning scheme. Upstream provides downloads for old versions, but
> doesn't
> really support them. And, explicitly they say everyone should be on the
> latest stable release -- they didn't support a 4.x branch when 5.0 came
> out.
>
> From a user point of view, the three streams I might
> want to choose from are:
>
> * Rolling always latest
> * Nightly dev builds!
> * A conservative stream which updates annually (or less!), ideally with
>   backports for critical security bugs
>

Yes!

Also, probably not in the Rawtherapee example, but a specific version
stream is an option, too, like we have with nodejs.


>
> I know there was pushback against naming stream branches "stable", so is
> there a good _other_ way to offer this? If I name the stream branch "5"
> after the upstream major release, how do I get people in the first case
> seamlessly on to "6" when it comes out, whenever that is?
>

"latest" would be the best option here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/modularity/making-modules/naming-guidelines/#_module_stream_name


>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 

Adam Šamalík
---------------------------
Software Engineer
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to