Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

2017-10-16 Thread Christopher Meng
On 10/16/17, Dan Book wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: >> > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing >> what >> > I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Coc

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

2017-10-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Dan Book wrote: > This is clean_requirements_on_remove being helpful as usual. Never should > have been a default setting as I've argued before, and the first thing I > disable in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf. > http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conf_ref.html#clean-requirements-on-remove-label +1

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

2017-10-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

2017-10-16 Thread Dan Book
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: > > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing > what > > I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends on > > NetworkManager, whi

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

2017-10-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing what > I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends on > NetworkManager, which nobody would expect and is easily overlooked. > PLEASE FIX I th

Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

2017-10-16 Thread Radka Janekova
Hi, so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing what I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends on NetworkManager, which nobody would expect and is easily overlooked. PLEASE FIX [1] https://cloud.rhea-ayase.eu/s/eH6JX43kYErHJ3s Cheers, Radka

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > According to my reading today that was disabled for the beta and only > > present in the developer version to assist in the migration and porting > etc > > > > As of FF57 beta WebExtension only is supported and legacy is killed off. >

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Thomas Daede
On 10/16/2017 01:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main > problem. > > I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work > out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess FF > maintainers may have

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 00:05 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > > updates-testing but

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep > getting new builds in

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Greg Evenden
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main > problem. > > I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work > out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess F

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

2017-10-16 Thread jkurik
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-10-17 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Work

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep > getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in > bodhi,

Accidentally disabling units with systemd scriptlets

2017-10-16 Thread Jeremy Cline
Hey folks, I recently did a large re-write of a specfile in order to provide a Python 3 version and to make it easier to maintain. Prior to this re-write the specfile produced a number of subpackages that each provided a service file (fedmsg-hub, fedmsg-relay, ...). In my re-write I had the pytho

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

2017-10-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:04:58PM -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > >>But that's not the end of the fun. GCL failed the mass rebuild this > >>summer. It built successfully on every ar

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171015.n.0 changes

2017-10-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171015.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped pac

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

2017-10-16 Thread Florian Weimer
On 10/16/2017 09:04 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote: On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: But that's not the end of the fun.  GCL failed the mass rebuild this summer.  It built successfully on every architecture but s390x.  On s

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

2017-10-16 Thread Japheth Cleaver
On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: But that's not the end of the fun. GCL failed the mass rebuild this summer. It built successfully on every architecture but s390x. On s390x, the build failed due to a failed call to m

Fedora 27-20171016.n.0 compose check report

2017-10-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 26/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171015.n.0): ID: 158613 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/15861

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

2017-10-16 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.

Fedora Rawhide-20171016.n.0 compose check report

2017-10-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 83/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171015.n.0): ID: 158441 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj

F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

2017-10-16 Thread Florian Weimer
Are there currently bugs in composes for x86-64 for F26/F27? We had one case for F27 where the compose was demonstrably broken because it lacked a required multilib: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071 We received a report on an issue which looks similar, this time on F26: https://bodhi.

Re: apple swift fedora support

2017-10-16 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:50:01 +, you wrote: >Is there any initiative to package apple swift and other swift tools? > >https://github.com/apple/swift Attempt to package and get into Fedora can usually be found in Bugzilla, for Swift see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115

New Package: PDC Branch already exists?

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Cullen
Can anyone give me a hint as to what happened here? Did the package somehow get partially created?https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2269 Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to dev

Re: Hi

2017-10-16 Thread Athos Ribeiro
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:30:13AM -0400, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hi all, Welcome Jiri, > > my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be > focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go > source code analysis. I am interested in both :) Plea

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-16 Thread John Florian
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 15:03 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 October 2017 at 14:58, John Florian wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and > > > cleaner interface. > > > > Yes! Because of this thread's

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-16 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On lundi 16 octobre 2017 15:58:32 CEST John Florian wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > > > > interface. > > Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 > eager to try

Re: Hi

2017-10-16 Thread nicolas . mailhot
Hi, You're very welcome! We will work together, I think -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 October 2017 at 14:58, John Florian wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > interface. > > > Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 eager > to try it out (on $day

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

2017-10-16 Thread John Florian
On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > interface. Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 eager to try it out (on $dayjob workstation). Now I want it at $home workstation. Is t

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

2017-10-16 Thread John Florian
> On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 14:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I don't know. Others have expressed frustration with selinux policy > > maintainers of late as well. It's really hard to say what the trouble > > is... are there to few of them? Overtasked with other work? Workflow too > > difficult? Perh

Re: Hi

2017-10-16 Thread Germano Massullo
Welcome!! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hi

2017-10-16 Thread Silvia Sánchez
Hi Jiri, Welcome aboard! Cheers, Silvia 2017-10-16 14:30 GMT+01:00 Jiri Kucera : > Hi all, > > my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be > focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go > source code analysis. > _

Re: Interdependent packages *must* go in the same update - a reminder (ref. nss and nspr)

2017-10-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:55:46AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > That's far less important. Especially the distinction between > > enhancement and newpackage, I think, barely matters. > If we had this metadata for stuff that lands in Rawhide, it'd be > useful, but since we don't, it's basically

Hi

2017-10-16 Thread Jiri Kucera
Hi all, my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go source code analysis. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Gerald B. Cox
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < >> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 >>> u

apple swift fedora support

2017-10-16 Thread Radovan Sroka
Is there any initiative to package apple swift and other swift tools? https://github.com/apple/swift Thanks. -- -- - Radovan Sroka Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:00:05AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > Sure, out of box thinking is not expected here and Vogons could take > lessons from our council members ;-) Just wait until you see our poetry! In seriousness, out-of-the-box thinking should be *encouraged* — but please in the the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: jcapik

2017-10-16 Thread Ondřej Lysoněk
On 9.10.2017 09:24, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > I'd like to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Jaromir > Capik (jcapik). I filed a FESCO ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1786 Best regards Ondřej Lysoněk ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:12 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the > update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch? > > background: > I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the > new library is a

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 October 2017 at 10:18, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: >> >> On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmai

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is r

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < >> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 >>> updat

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

2017-10-16 Thread James Hogarth
On 16 October 2017 at 08:13, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 10/15/2017 08:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package, > >> instead. The applications that use the older versions should probably > >

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new buil

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

2017-10-16 Thread Martin Stransky
On 10/15/2017 11:04 PM, Greg Evenden wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

2017-10-16 Thread Till Hofmann
On 10/15/2017 08:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package, >> instead. The applications that use the older versions should probably >> be linked to the older one, but things should progressively m