> On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 14:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
I don't know. Others have expressed frustration with selinux policy
> > maintainers of late as well. It's really hard to say what the trouble
> > is... are there to few of them? Overtasked with other work? Workflow too
> > difficult? Perhaps we can get FESCO or someone to work with them and try
> > and come up with a more open and working workflow. I'm not sure what the
> > answer is here.
I see it's not just me then that's noticed this. It wasn't too long
ago that I could file a BZ and see updates later that day. That was
unbelievably fast turnaround and made admin life so much easier. I'd
rarely bother with a local policy to address such issues because they
were generally so temporary. However, I've noticed with, at least
BZ#1448877 opened back in May, hasn't seem to have gotten the slightest
bit of attention.
I try to avoid local policies because I highly doubt that what I arrive
at is done as securely as it should be, but more importantly that
doesn't help anyone else out who's in or will be in the same situation.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
