===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-08-18)
===
Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:48 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-18/fesco.2017-08-18-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 09:51:40PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:06:22PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > >I swear we talked about this somewhere before. I can't find the
> > >ticket, though.
> > Possibly https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/23
> Yes! That was t
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:06:22PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >I swear we talked about this somewhere before. I can't find the
> >ticket, though.
> Possibly https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/23
Yes! That was totally it. Thanks.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
___
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
I swear we talked about this somewhere before. I can't find the
ticket,
though.
Possibly https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/23
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:13:17PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's an important consequence of this that I only realized today.
>
> pkgdb had an API endpoint, 'collections', which was useful as a
> reliable source of information about available Fedora releases and
> their status. It still
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Sadly I know how terrible tcp_wrappers is and so I know it needs to go
> away.
just because crows trying to protect their young will 'mob' a
hawk hunting to feed her young does not make the hawk
terrible; latest is not always greatest
I foun
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, at 07:43 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
> which leads to unusable system, because of missing important files,
> like /etc/shadow,
Sounds like you're using dnf for a host system? The Fedora
editions
On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:42 -0400, Ralph Bean wrote:
> To make this happen requires significant infrastructure changes. Our
> proposed plan[4] is to decommission PkgDB entirely and to replace it
> with a combination of PDC[5] and pagure over dist-git. (Tangentially,
> getting pagure over dist-git
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 59/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170817.n.3):
ID: 1
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 06:45:57PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> - golang-github-jlaffaye-ftp - A FTP client package for Go
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475817
> - golang-github-golang-sync - Go concurrency primitives
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On 18/08/17 02:27 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
> Ok, will take a look at this.
>
> On 08/18/2017 01:54 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> Following the request from Design team, I struggle to package Knotter
>> for review due to failure related to Qt5.
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?tas
On 18/08/17 06:57 AM, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> There are various error messages about missing files. The project uses git
> submodules, make sure you provide them as well.
>
> https://github.com/mbasaglia/Knotter/tree/master/src/widgets
> ___
> devel m
For the record, denyhosts currently relies upon the tcp_wrappers
functionality in openssh to function. While it's possible to make it
manipulate the firewall as well, the whole situation is kind of a mess.
(Does it talk to firewalld? What if you're not running firewalld?)
Sadly I know how terrib
On 18/08/17 02:28 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:54:25 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>
>> Following the request from Design team, I struggle to package Knotter
>> for review due to failure related to Qt5.
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726
>>
- Original Message -
> From: "Irina Boverman"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 7:18:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Promoting a package to stable
>
> Yes, I can.
> Would adding karma allow me to promote this package?
Yes, see
https://fedoraprojec
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 13:18 -0400, Irina Boverman wrote:
> Yes, I can.
> Would adding karma allow me to promote this package?
> Irina.
Yes. The rules are explained in the update policy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Updates_to_.27critical_path.27_packages
critpath packages must wa
Yes, I can.
Would adding karma allow me to promote this package?
Irina.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:45:40AM -0400, Irina Boverman wrote:
> > I have a package in F25/F25 stable distributions that will not install
> > because the dependency
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:42:21 +0200
Jakub Jelen wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> > Hello Fedora devels and users,
> >
> > more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we
> > want
> > this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resul
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:55:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:45:40AM -0400, Irina Boverman wrote:
> > I have a package in F25/F25 stable distributions that will not install
> > because the dependency is no longer there (new version of libwebsockets was
> > promoted to sta
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:45:40AM -0400, Irina Boverman wrote:
> I have a package in F25/F25 stable distributions that will not install
> because the dependency is no longer there (new version of libwebsockets was
> promoted to stable). I re-built them, but I have to wait another week
> before it
I have a package in F25/F25 stable distributions that will not install
because the dependency is no longer there (new version of libwebsockets was
promoted to stable). I re-built them, but I have to wait another week
before it will be possible to promote them to stable. Is there a way to
promote th
Hello,
I've been able to compile from the github repo installing
qt5-qttools-static-5.7.1-5.fc26.x86_64
and making few changes to the code as in the attached patch.
Cheers,
Franco
On 18 August 2017 at 15:57, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> There are various error messages about missing files. The p
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 13:58 +0200, Jakub Jelen wrote:
> Hello Fedora devels and users,
>
> more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we
> want
> this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted
> mostly in flames and in the removal of the dependency on tcp_w
On 08/15/2017 02:50 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
Adam Williamson kirjoitti 15.08.2017 klo 02:37:
Of course, for day-to-day Rawhide users, booting with 'enforcing=0' can
work around these issues for now (or you could, I suppose, create a
local policy that just blanket allowed the 'map' permission
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in thread [1] I would like to propose update of the
> blocker process SOP page [2] regarding Accepted0Day and
> AcceptedPreviousRelease. Currently we have in the policy the following
> statement:
>
> "Accepted0Day is used f
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:03:57 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> >> # dnf remove setup
> rpm is low level tool. No, I am talking just about use of dnf which is high
> level tool for working
> with packages/modules.
*ouch* Covering such a corner-case is of limited use, IMO.
What other package tool
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 10:59 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Thanks Adam for putting this together. I am definitely+1 to extend the
> > Blocker bug process with your proposal.
> >
> > And there is one more topic re
Le dimanche 06 août 2017 à 19:41:39 (-0400), Ben Rosser a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > My name is Robert-André and I'm looking to become a packager for Fedora.
> [...]
> >
> > So if you like my work so far, please consider sponsoring m
On 18.8.2017 16:16, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
> $ rpm -q --whatrequires setup
> rpcbind-0.2.4-7.rc2.fc26.x86_64
> shadow-utils-4.3.1-3.fc26.x86_64
>
>>
>> # dnf remove setup
>>
>> I am not talking about update,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>> fedpkg-1.29 should work with python2-rpkg-1.50 together.
>
> Maybe we could make fedpkg-1.29 Requires: python2-rpkg >= 1.50 ?
>
Good idea :) I have already made a PR. Than
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 15:20:55 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> >>> $ rpm -q --whatrequires setup
> >>> rpcbind-0.2.4-7.rc2.fc26.x86_64
> >>> shadow-utils-4.3.1-3.fc26.x86_64
> >>>
>
> # dnf remove setup
>
> I am not talking about update, I am talking about situation that you can
> break c
There are various error messages about missing files. The project uses git
submodules, make sure you provide them as well.
https://github.com/mbasaglia/Knotter/tree/master/src/widgets
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-08-18 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
>
> On 18.8.2017 14:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:10:16 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:43:28 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
On 18.8.2017 14:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:10:16 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:43:28 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>>>
Hi folks,
I found now that the setup rpm is removabl
On 18.8.2017 13:46, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
>> which leads to unusable system, because of missing important files,
>> like /etc/shadow,
>>
>> Could you anyone sa
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:10:16 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:43:28 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
> >
> > Clarify, please. What
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:43:28 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
>
> Clarify, please. What exactly have you found out? Have you found an update
> case where one of t
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:43:28 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
Clarify, please. What exactly have you found out? Have you found an update
case where one of the package updater tools removed it actually?
$ rpm -q --whatrequ
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
> which leads to unusable system, because of missing important files,
> like /etc/shadow,
>
> Could you anyone say why that? I heard something about dependency he
Hi folks,
I found now that the setup rpm is removable from the system,
which leads to unusable system, because of missing important files,
like /etc/shadow,
Could you anyone say why that? I heard something about dependency hell, so
in that case, the packages should be at least protected like
Am 18.08.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Sandro Mani:
Hi
I needs these simple perl packages reviewed to fix broken dependencies
introduced in licensecheck-3.0.31 (the reason it actually built
successfully was that licensecheck-3.0.30 actually provided
perl(Regexp::Pattern::License), fact which I missed
Hi
I needs these simple perl packages reviewed to fix broken dependencies
introduced in licensecheck-3.0.31 (the reason it actually built
successfully was that licensecheck-3.0.30 actually provided
perl(Regexp::Pattern::License), fact which I missed, but now 3.0.31
can't be installed since it
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:04:52AM +0200, Jakub Martisko wrote:
> It should work now [1].
>
> Jakub
>
> [1]:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21296324
Thanks, I'll try to rebuild ocaml-gsl & ocaml-lacaml shortly.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:54:25 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Following the request from Design team, I struggle to package Knotter
> for review due to failure related to Qt5.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726
>
> As I am not familiar with Qt5. Can someone help to
Ok, will take a look at this.
On 08/18/2017 01:54 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Following the request from Design team, I struggle to package Knotter
for review due to failure related to Qt5.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21287726
As I am not familiar with Qt5. Can someone
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:28:26PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
Il 18/ago/2017 08:41 AM, "Ralf Corsepius" ha scritto:
On 08/18/2017 08:23 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Benson Muite
> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible for the people who are running and have not answered
>> interview questions for the blog or have an informative profile to
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 03:18:10PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> fedpkg-1.29 should work with python2-rpkg-1.50 together.
Maybe we could make fedpkg-1.29 Requires: python2-rpkg >= 1.50 ?
Pierre
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Honggang LI wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:28:26PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
>> >
>> > As new rdma-core package had been import
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 02:28:26PM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Honggang LI wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
> >
> > As new rdma-core package had been imported to fedora-27, I'm working
> > on retire the old user space
51 matches
Mail list logo
