On 07/30/2017 01:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/30/2017 10:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 07/29/2017 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2017 10:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Rebuilds are currently blocked on a new buildroot with some RPM
debuginfo generation fixes. Rumor
On 07/30/2017 10:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/29/2017 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 10:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Rebuilds are currently blocked on a new buildroot with some RPM
>>> debuginfo generation fixes. Rumor has it that there is an unrelated
>>> issue which pr
On 07/29/2017 12:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 10:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Rebuilds are currently blocked on a new buildroot with some RPM
>> debuginfo generation fixes. Rumor has it that there is an unrelated
>> issue which prevents buildroot updates.
>
> This appears to be
On 07/29/2017 08:25 AM, Jos de Kloe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do a build for the python-metar package (first time since
> I adapted it after it was orphaned), but I constantly get this error
> when I try to do a fedpkg build:
>
> FAILED: BuildError: package metar not in list for tag f27-pend
On 07/29/2017 12:07 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide.
>
>
Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:06:45 +0200, you wrote:
> >Why is not providing /usr/bin/python more use hostile? Why is it better
> >for any script to use /usr/bin/python instead of /usr/bin/python3?
>
> Because any user of Fedora trying to learn Python using either books
> or
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > So that's effectively a hard design constraint for me: folks
> > targeting EL6 and EL7 *are* going to have to use "/usr/bin/python" in
> > their shebang lines (since they can't even assume "/usr/bin/python2"
> > wil
On 30 July 2017 at 10:02, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > Providing
> > an unversioned "python" serves only to lure incautious programmers into
> > using it where they should use a versioned name.
>
> My aim is for folks to start thinking of a "/usr/bin/python" shebang
> as being akin to writing "/bin/
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2017-07-31
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's time for another meeting! It's mostly going to be F27 planning
stuff this week.
If anyone has a
On 07/27/2017 03:23 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 04:21 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> I noticed one of my packages failed to build because the test suite
>> failed, but only on ppc64le.
>>
>> builddir/build/BUILD/cyrus-imapd-3.0.2/cunit/.libs/lt-unit: error while
>> loading shared libr
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > The immediate result is that highlight is uninstallable because nothing
> > provides /bin/lua. We could patch the example file to use
> > #!/usr/bin/lua instead, but IMHO it's not reasonable that a mere example
> > in the documentatio
On 07/30/2017 05:19 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> This is expected 😉 But if you think it is wrong, you are welcomed t
> o open a bug.
Filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476594
The file is now indeed executable. Previously, it was not. I have not
investigated whether this is due to
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 17:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua:
>>
>> $ rpm -qp --requires
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x8
>> 6_64/highlight-3.39-1
On 30/07/17 15:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/30/2017 04:22 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 30/07/17 15:03, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/30/2017 03:42 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Is Rawhide now ready for building?
I have other packages that need a rebuild.
It depends. There are still 48 packages wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 17:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua:
>
> $ rpm -qp --requires
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x8
> 6_64/highlight-3.39-1.fc27.x86_64.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua:
>
> $ rpm -qp --requires
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x86_64/highlight-3.39-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm
> /bin/lua
> config(highlight) = 3.39-1.fc27
> li
highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua:
$ rpm -qp --requires
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x86_64/highlight-3.39-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm
/bin/lua
config(highlight) = 3.39-1.fc27
libc.so.6()(64bit)
…
I have verified that this comes from the
/usr/shar
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:11:56 -0400, you wrote:
>> One of Fedora's stated goals is to remain close to the upstream.
>> Upstream Python is going to change /usr/bin/python to mean Python 3. If
>> AH keeps it on Python 2, it will be confusing for Python programmers
>> using AH. It will be especially c
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:06:45 +0200, you wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved
>> problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even more
>> user hostile than pointing it at a modern v
On 07/30/2017 04:22 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/07/17 15:03, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 07/30/2017 03:42 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>
>>> Is Rawhide now ready for building?
>>> I have other packages that need a rebuild.
>>
>> It depends. There are still 48 packages which could show similar
>> b
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 July 2017 at 07:57, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > > To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration
> > > for a very low gain, it makes me feel like having an unversioned
> > > "python" (whether as
On 30/07/17 15:03, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/30/2017 03:42 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
Is Rawhide now ready for building?
I have other packages that need a rebuild.
It depends. There are still 48 packages which could show similar
breakage, and python3 and mariadb are among them. In addition
On 07/30/2017 03:42 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Is Rawhide now ready for building?
> I have other packages that need a rebuild.
It depends. There are still 48 packages which could show similar
breakage, and python3 and mariadb are among them. In addition, there
are some broken builds which have
On 30 July 2017 at 07:57, Björn Persson wrote:
> Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> To be honest, given how much energy is spent on this migration for a
>> very low gain, it makes me feel like having an unversioned "python"
>> (whether as package or executable names) was a mistake we should let
>> disappea
On 07/30/2017 03:19 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/27/2017 11:15 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>
>> Same problem with MPI libraries of MUMPS just on PPC64le:
>>
>> + export
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/MUMPS_5.1.1/MUMPS-5.1.1-openmpi/examples:../lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib
>> +
>> LD_LI
On 07/27/2017 11:15 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Same problem with MPI libraries of MUMPS just on PPC64le:
>
> + export
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/MUMPS_5.1.1/MUMPS-5.1.1-openmpi/examples:../lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib
> +
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/MUMPS_5.1.1/MUMPS-5.1.1
On 07/27/2017 01:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I noticed one of my packages failed to build because the test suite
> failed, but only on ppc64le.
>
> builddir/build/BUILD/cyrus-imapd-3.0.2/cunit/.libs/lt-unit: error while
> loading shared libraries:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/cyrus-imapd-3.0.2
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Would the person who tagged glibc-2.25.90-29.fc27 into f27-override be
> so kind and remove that tag? I need glibc-2.25.90-30.fc27 to be able to
> build curl, which is needed to fix cmake, which in turn will fix a
> couple of FTBFS errors o
On 07/29/2017 09:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/28/2017 10:58 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Rebuilds are currently blocked on a new buildroot with some RPM
>> debuginfo generation fixes. Rumor has it that there is an unrelated
>> issue which prevents buildroot updates.
>
> This appears to be
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 25/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170724.n.0):
ID: 125294 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical
URL: https://ope
Would the person who tagged glibc-2.25.90-29.fc27 into f27-override be
so kind and remove that tag? I need glibc-2.25.90-30.fc27 to be able to
build curl, which is needed to fix cmake, which in turn will fix a
couple of FTBFS errors on ppc64le.
Please contact some of the toolchain folks before ta
Das mangosteen-instantgetrank verbrennt bis 10 kilo fett in 2 wochen!
Bewahren sie sich vor einer verfettung und reduzieren sie infarkt-, diabetes- und hypertonierisiko um 89%
Tausende von frauen haben ihnen ihre Gesundheit und
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 27 Rawhide 20170729.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test
33 matches
Mail list logo
