On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > highlight-3.36-3.fc27 suddenly has a Requires: /bin/lua: > > $ rpm -qp --requires > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/highlight/3.39/1.fc27/x86_64/highlight-3.39-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm > /bin/lua > config(highlight) = 3.39-1.fc27 > libc.so.6()(64bit) > … > > I have verified that this comes from the > /usr/share/doc/highlight/examples/json/theme2json.lua file installed by > the package. > > The immediate result is that highlight is uninstallable because nothing > provides /bin/lua. We could patch the example file to use > #!/usr/bin/lua instead, but IMHO it's not reasonable that a mere example > in the documentation introduces a hard dependency. > > Is this the expected behavior? Shall I file a bug against rpm? >
This is a bug. RPM isn't supposed to look for these in documentation directories. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
