Review swap: gimp-luminosity-masks

Hello team, I am looking for a review swap for gimp-luminosity-masks: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476440 The package is very simple and easy to review. Thanks in advance, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net ___

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On 07/28/2017 04:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide. >>> >>> Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog. >>> If someone wants to check over and make sure I di

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On 07/28/2017 07:20 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide. >> >> Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog. >> If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were >> fixed in the 6.x branch

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >>wrote: > >>>Do you think it'd be possible to script

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 21:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > > It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved > > problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even > > more user hostile than pointing it at a

Re: armv7hl builds running out of memory

On 07/27/2017 09:16 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 07/26/2017 06:25 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> I've been experimenting in a slightly different environment (RHEL vs Fedora) >> but have been seeing oddly similar results. The use or not of the "-pipe" in >> GCC didn't seem to help. If I forced the ma

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense t

Re: Mass rebuild failures only on ppc64le: glibc problem?

Status update: Nick has pushed binutils-2.29-3.fc27, which disables the binutils change by default. (There is still an ld option to enable it. Hopefully, no packages use that yet.) Just rebuilding glibc is insufficient as a fix. The localentry optimization is so sensitive to changes that glibc

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo > > renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to > > do it in rawhide no

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

Am 28.07.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Michael Cronenworth: On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide. Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog. If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were fixed in the 6.x branch that would

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 14:11 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > First, I don't see a need for even mild pejoratives; instead of > "normal" you could say > for example "other editions". My apologies - I was just struggling with terminology. No offense intended. signature.asc Description: This is a digit

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:29:12PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > It's only /usr/bin/python itself that still presents an unsolved > problem, since the status quo (not providing it at all) is even more > user hostile than pointing it at a modern version of Python 3 that Why is not providing /usr/bi

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:39:50PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the > general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have > to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e., > changes to a

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 20:11, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is quite l

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH > > anytime soon.  It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is > > quite > > low. > > One of Fedora's st

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 18:38, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote: I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going to repeat it. Yes, we hear

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 18:41, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic Host

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH > anytime soon.  It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is > quite > low. One of Fedora's stated goals is to remain close to the upstream. Upstream Python is going

Re: ppc64le build failure, does it look familiar?

Yes, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475636 On 07/28/2017 07:06 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > More ceph-12.1.1 > > This has built successfully previously, including the recent mass > rebuild. Today the other associated builds have either finished or > passed this point, but on th

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

We had a short meeting today because we lost quorum part-way through the meeting. === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-07-28) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:01:24 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.or

Re: ppc64le build failure, does it look familiar?

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:06:18PM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > > /lib64/librt.so.1: expected localentry:0 `pthread_attr_setdetachstate' See the thread “Mass rebuild failures only on ppc64le: glibc problem?” by Tibbs. > Look familiar to anyone? -- Tomasz Torcz "Never u

ppc64le build failure, does it look familiar?

More ceph-12.1.1 This has built successfully previously, including the recent mass rebuild. Today the other associated builds have either finished or passed this point, but on the ppc64le build today I got this: ... Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target ppc

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I > don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything > about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic Host. I'm opposed to switching the mean

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote: > >> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm >> going to repeat it. >> > > Yes, we hear you. > > Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL. >> > > It is.

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28 July 2017 at 08:29, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 28 July 2017 at 20:48, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python > upstream. > > > > That again? That really seems like a nonstarte

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 17:51, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: The change has to start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL, I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense. There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we la

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The change has to > start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL, > I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense. There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we landed the editions, although that's som

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote: I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going to repeat it. Yes, we hear you. Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL. It is. However it is hard to coordinate a future change with RHEL7 that is

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 16:17, Colin Walters wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. Tha

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 14:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous di

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 12:48, Colin Walters wrote: On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. That again? Seems like a never ending story, right? :( > That really seems like a nonstarter; previous> discussion

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 12:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo renaming? May be possible but given the variety in

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28.7.2017 09:51, Nick Coghlan wrote: On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with?

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 29 July 2017 at 00:25, John Dennis wrote: > I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going > to repeat it. > > Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL. > > Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but the real world > rea

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > There was one additional late-breaking ticket that will also be discussed: #topic #1751 - Reque

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going to repeat it. Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL. Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but the real world reality is spec files are shared between both. At the mome

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-07-28)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-07-28 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below ca

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

On 07/27/2017 09:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: ok. I have pushed 6.9.9-3 to rawhide. Hopefully I got all the CVE's right in the changelog. If someone wants to check over and make sure I didn't miss any that were fixed in the 6.x branch that would be great. I'd like to let it run a few days in rawhi

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. > > > > That again? That really seems

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28 July 2017 at 22:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote: >> Plus just breaking everyone's random old scripts. Now, I >> don't know if this has been discussed upstream > > This is a statement born of ignorance, but ... > > Would it be possible to s

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 07/28/2017 11:01 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > So instead of taking this slowly, I'd rather go through FESCo > and public announcement on fedora-devel, and then just apply the change > to as many packages as possible at once. I concur. I think this is one of the cases where we should

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On 07/28/2017 03:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > I think it is seriously flawed optimization that should be at least turned > off by default. If people are willing to do this mess on ppc64le for some > libraries, they should request it explicitly, but we certainly shouldn't > make the implementation

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Conceptually, this optimization inlines aspects of the called function > > into the caller, across DSO boundaries. In particular, as implemented > > now on ppc64le, the net effect is that the ABI changes if you add a > > global var

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:06:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/28/2017 02:22 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 13:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the > >> general case, applications and libraries linking

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On 07/28/2017 02:22 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 13:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the >> general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have >> to be rebuilt when the DSO c

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:39:50PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the > general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have > to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e., > changes to a

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28 July 2017 at 20:48, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. > > That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous > discussion specifically around Atomic Host + Ans

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. > > That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous > discussion specifically around Atomic

Re: Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

Hi Florian, On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 13:39 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the > general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have > to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e., > changes

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. > > That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous > discussion specifically around Atomic Ho

Recompiling/relinking dependent applications/libraries on DSO change

binutils 2.29 introduced an optimization which requires that in the general case, applications and libraries linking against a DSO will have to be rebuilt when the DSO change the implementation of functions (i.e., changes to a function body can change ABI). This is how many native programming lang

Re: Mass rebuild failures only on ppc64le: glibc problem?

On 2017-07-27 10:15, Antonio Trande wrote: On 07/27/2017 01:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: I noticed one of my packages failed to build because the test suite failed, but only on ppc64le. builddir/build/BUILD/cyrus-imapd-3.0.2/cunit/.libs/lt-unit: error while loading shared libraries: /bu

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > * Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream. That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous discussion specifically around Atomic Host + Ansible: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:01:35AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.7.2017 v 10:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > > > As far as I can see this is looking all good but you know the more eyes the > > better :) > > https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/group/ruby-packagers-sig > > rele

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo > >renaming? > > May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't > think it would be ea

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

Dne 28.7.2017 v 10:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > As far as I can see this is looking all good but you know the more eyes the > better :) https://src.stg.fedoraproject.org/pagure/group/ruby-packagers-sig releng is ruby-packagers-sig group member? How so? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/a

Re: F27 Self Contained Change: Samba AD

Il giorno gio, 27/07/2017 alle 15.16 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto: > > But the folder is not accessible from bind user: > # ll -ld /var/lib/samba/private/ > drwx--. 6 root root 4096 27 lug 13.46 /var/lib/samba/private/ > > then I have change it with: > # chmod g+rx /var/lib/samba/private/ >

Re: Coming soon: Pagure service for dist-git

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:50:13AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:36:29AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 27.7.2017 v 10:05 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a): > > >> 2) The "contributors" list does not appear to be correct. Looking at > > >> "ruby", there is listed "tago

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo > renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to > do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should > significantly cut down

Re: Finalizing Fedora's Switch to Python 3

On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo renaming? May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't think it would be easy. IMHO taking a bunch of provenpackagers and updating the packages ma