Adam Williamson píše v Čt 25. 05. 2017 v 12:09 -0700:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 13:04 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Dear Packagers:
> >
> > I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started
> > happening
> > unexpectedly:
> >
> > [zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm
> >
On 05/25/2017 09:04 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Dear Packagers:
>
> I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started happening
> unexpectedly:
>
> [zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48:
> DeprecationWarning: fedo
Kevin Kofler writes:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Currently bodhi offers three options on updates:
>> × unspecified
>> × reboot
>> × logout
>>
>> For packages that provide daemons (like systemd) a third option would be
>> useful. The daemon is restarted in %post, so nothing needs to d
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Currently bodhi offers three options on updates:
> × unspecified
> × reboot
> × logout
>
> For packages that provide daemons (like systemd) a third option would be
> useful. The daemon is restarted in %post, so nothing needs to done.
> I think this is quite com
On 05/01/2017 08:35 AM, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 4.11 kernel was officially released last night. This kernel should
> be showing up in a rawhide release in the next few days. F26 will also
> get the final 4.11 update and then get the incremental stable updates
> as they are released. F24/
Currently bodhi offers three options on updates:
× unspecified
× reboot
× logout
For packages that provide daemons (like systemd) a third option would be
useful. The daemon is restarted in %post, so nothing needs to done.
I think this is quite common. Apart from daemons, it also applies to
command
The F26 Beta Readiness meeting has just finished. Even we have "No-Go"
status for now, all the teams are ready to ship the F26 Beta release
once it is available.
Please check the Meeting minutes [1] for more information.
[1]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2017-05-25/f26-beta-
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 13:04 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Dear Packagers:
>
> I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started happening
> unexpectedly:
>
> [zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48:
> Deprecation
Dear Packagers:
I probably missed some kind of announcement, but this started happening
unexpectedly:
[zaitcev@lembas liberasurecode.master]$ fedpkg srpm
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: DeprecationWarning:
fedora.client.bodhi has been deprecated. Please use bodhi.clie
Release status of the Fedora 26 Beta is NO-GO.
Due to missing RC of Fedora 26 Beta release and presence of blocker
bugs [1] we are delaying release of Fedora 26 Beta for one week.
There is going to be one more Go/No-Go meeting the next Thursday, June
1st, 2017 at 17:00 UTC to verify we are ready f
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:45:58AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I haven't had much time for Fedora develoment the last 9 months or
> so, but I may be able to start doing more again around August. I
> continue to use Fedora on my work desktop and multiple machines at
> home (currently rawhide).
I haven't had much time for Fedora develoment the last 9 months or so, but I
may be able to start doing more again around August. I continue to use
Fedora on my work desktop and multiple machines at home (currently rawhide).
___
devel mailing list -- d
On 05/18/2017 11:42 AM, Thanos Apostolou wrote:
> Hi, my name is Thanos Apostolou and I am from Greece. I am studying
> Electrical and Computer Engineering in the National Technical University of
> Athens.
Hi Thanos, Big welcome to you!
>
>
>
> My linux experience, so far, is this:
>
> I
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Thanos Apostolou
> wrote:
> > No I'm not talking audio/video packages. There are other packages
> > missing from Fedora and RPM Fusion, which are available on Ubuntu and on
> > arch repositories or AUR and t
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 25.5.2017 v 04:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> Longer answer: yeah, we have wanted to do so for a long time, but just
>> haven't gotten there.
>
> I will extend Nirik's answer.
> There are old ARM machines which were used for Secondary Arch
Dne 25.5.2017 v 04:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> Longer answer: yeah, we have wanted to do so for a long time, but just
> haven't gotten there.
I will extend Nirik's answer.
There are old ARM machines which were used for Secondary Arch Koji. But they
are very small. They are not capable to
handle V
= Proposed System Wide Change:Ruby on Rails 5.1 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_5.1
Change owner(s):
* Pavel Valena
* Vít Ondruch
* Jun Aruga
Ruby on Rails 5.1 is the latest version of well known web framework
written in Ruby.
== Detailed Description ==
The Ruby on Rai
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 16.58.10 WEST Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> > Isn't this because "Version" is the name of a tag? Just like Name and
> > Release. And Tag names are not case-sensitive, so you could write this
> > in your spec file:
> >
> > VERSION: 12.34
> >
> > Reusing those for your own macros
On 25/05/17 09:23 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Yes, you are right - I should use some prefix for it to clearly
distinguish these two macros. I originally thought the only one and
unique macro for Version: tag is only %{version} and %{VERSION} etc. are
different (because I thought all macros are ca
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'm still adjusting to the new repoquery. I'll get those.
>
Me too! It's been really frustrating.
Could we at least get a best practice way of getting rebuild dependencies
in the wiki? Or better, someone write a script around dnf r
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2017-05-25, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Updating to 3.1, rebuilding ganglia and libftdi. If I missed anything,
> > please let me know.
> >
> Yes, I think you missed some:
>
> # dnf --quiet repoquery --source --whatrequires 'libconfuse.so.1()(64b
On 2017-05-25, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Updating to 3.1, rebuilding ganglia and libftdi. If I missed anything,
> please let me know.
>
Yes, I think you missed some:
# dnf --quiet repoquery --source --whatrequires 'libconfuse.so.1()(64bit)'
bmon-3.7-4.fc26.src.rpm
ganglia-3.7.2-14.fc26.src.rpm
i3statu
Updating to 3.1, rebuilding ganglia and libftdi. If I missed anything,
please let me know.
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
___
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:22:31PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 25/05/17 00:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> >> On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:54 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 25/05/17 11:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the
>
On 25/05/17 11:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
T
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
> >
> > ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
> >
> > This has happened on a couple
On 25/05/17 00:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 24/05/17 09:58 -0500, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
today, I've accidentally attested there are no stability
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
>
> ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
>
> This has happened on a couple of reviews I have done recently. There
> is no other information given a
On 05/25/2017 11:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
>
> ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
> So .. what does it mean?
My guess it's intended as an encouragement to build extensions for both
Python 2 *and* 3.
fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
This has happened on a couple of reviews I have done recently. There
is no other information given about what this means or why it's bad.
Both were Python packages and the
On 05/24/2017 06:08 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 24/05/17 17:58 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> On 05/24/2017 05:49 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 24/05/17 17:32 +0200, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
I was doing rebase for gutenprint pre-release in recent rawhide (fc27)
and I cou
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 26 Beta Release Readiness Meeting on 2017-05-25 from 19:00:00 to
21:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
release of Fedora 26. Pl
33 matches
Mail list logo
