On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:59:36PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> >> Hello all,
>> >> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic W
10.05.2017 20:02 Jorge Gallegos wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:09:48PM +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> [...]
> > 2. I guess that dnf history undo would do the job.
>
> Hrm, I haven't looked at dnf history, fwiw this is the rough timeline of
> events:
>
> 1. install fedora 23 workstation (c
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Dan Book wrote:
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found out the Cinnamon Desktop group is behaving like Hotel
> > California. I had ``dnf
On Wed, 10 May 2017 13:24:15 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> or is the lack of being "ready" because they're all in use?
this is correct, all are in use by other tasks
Dan
> I've never had all other arches complete on a build before one
> starts...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
or is the lack of being "ready" because they're all in use?
I've never had all other arches complete on a build before one starts...
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
Subject says it all...
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 12:02:40PM -0400, Dan Book wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found out the Cinnamon Desktop group is behaving like Hotel
> California. I had ``dnf group install "Cinnamon Desktop"`` some time in
> the past, and w
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:09:48PM +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 8.05.2017 16:40 Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > [...]
> > [root@ragnia ~]# dnf group remove "Cinnamon Desktop"
> > Last metadata expiration check: 2:18:50 ago on Mon May 8 07:18:18 2017.
> > Dependencies resolved.
> > Error: The
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 8.5.2017 15:24, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> So we ( @kdesig ) started to update Qt to 5.9 on Rawhide as will be the
>> target for next Fedora release.
>> 5.8.x is already been dephased by upstream and 5.9.0 already reach beta
>> 3 stage.
>
>
On 8.5.2017 15:24, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
Hello everyone.
So we ( @kdesig ) started to update Qt to 5.9 on Rawhide as will be the
target for next Fedora release.
5.8.x is already been dephased by upstream and 5.9.0 already reach beta
3 stage.
Hi, one of my packages just FTBFS becaus
OCaml 4.04.1 was released last month. It is a simple bugfix update
which shouldn't bring any surprises.
I'm planning to rebuild the OCaml packages in Rawhide into a side tag
today (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6782).
The other change is that since fedorahosted was closed a few months
ago, the
11 matches
Mail list logo