On 27/04/17 07:38, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/04/17 21:39, David Sommerseth wrote:
So, to be able to provide OpenVPN in Fedora 26 it was decided to switch
to mbed TLS instead of OpenSSL (which OpenVPN also supports). That have
revealed several issues:
Why not just use the openssl 1.0.2 compat p
On 27 April 2017 at 02:30, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'll note as an aside that the other host system
> management tool we use in Fedora is rpm-ostree, part of
> Atomic Host: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree
>
> Due to the read-only bind mount over /usr provided by the ostree layer,
> pip
On 25/04/17 21:39, David Sommerseth wrote:
So, to be able to provide OpenVPN in Fedora 26 it was decided to switch
to mbed TLS instead of OpenSSL (which OpenVPN also supports). That have
revealed several issues:
Why not just use the openssl 1.0.2 compat package until you're ready to
move to
On 27 April 2017 at 11:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Charalampos Stratakis
>> At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe.
>> Pip shares its installation directory with dnf, can remove
>> dnf-managed files and generally break the Python 3 interpre
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
> Forwarding to fedora-devel as well
>
> Charalampos Stratakis
> Associate Software Engineer
> Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michal Cyprian"
> To: python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 19/116 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170425.n.0):
ID: 87010 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/87010
ID: 87041 Test: x
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 74/114 (x86_64), 22/23 (i386)
ID: 87162 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedorapr
Software collections for a segregated sane dep chain
On Apr 26, 2017 19:22, "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote:
> > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
We will be rebooting the koji database server in order to add more
virtual cpus to it.
This outage should be just a minute or two and should not hopefully
affect in progress builds.
Sorry for the short notice of this outage, but we wanted to improve koji
performance and this is an easy way to qui
On Wednesday, 26 April 2017 at 21:18, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote:
> > On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
> >> This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN
> >> in Fedora 26.
> >>
> >> Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1,
On 26 April 2017 at 17:41, Neal Gompa wrote:
> The problem with this approach is that it's not possible for the user
> to get additional locale content without reinstalling after enabling
> another locale (by installing the associated system langpack package
> that controls this). Splitting them o
On 26/04/17 17:08, Lee Howard wrote:
> On 04/25/2017 01:39 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN
>> in Fedora 26.
>>
>> Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and
>> good step forward. Unfortunately, th
Hi,
This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN
in Fedora 26.
Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and
good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge.
The OpenSSL v1.1 support is not completed. Patches have bee
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 14:48 +0200, Jan Sedlak wrote:
> 2017-04-25 20:41 GMT+02:00 Fedora compose checker :
> > ID: 86691 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
> > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/86691
>
> Hmpf, GTK+ has drawn a space between checkbox and label a few
> Our first attempt to make sudo pip safe on Fedora [0] was
This seems to be using "Fedora" to mean a *host* system, and
I'd agree there. I'll note as an aside that the other host system
management tool we use in Fedora is rpm-ostree, part of
Atomic Host: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-os
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
> On 25 April 2017 at 01:16, Rafal Luzynski
> wrote:
>>
>> But for small packages which have not so many translatable
>> messages producing dozens of small RPMs ~1 kilobyte each or even
>> less would doesn't sound like a good solution. So I s
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:16:44AM +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> But for small packages which have not so many translatable
> messages producing dozens of small RPMs ~1 kilobyte each or even
> less would doesn't sound like a good solution. So I suggest to
> introduce this feature but not globally
2017-04-25 20:41 GMT+02:00 Fedora compose checker :
> ID: 86691 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/86691
Hmpf, GTK+ has drawn a space between checkbox and label a few pixels
wider. I've tried to reproduce it locally with the same
Forwarding to fedora-devel as well
Charalampos Stratakis
Associate Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Cyprian"
To: python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:19:00 AM
Subject: What is your opinion on "sudo pi
this happen because i have an old pc with same problem ... and i forgett to set
the proper date/hour in the bios settings
regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello all,
I agree with Rafal. I think that in the case of small or medium
packages this would be counterproductive.
Kind regards,Silvia
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 01:16 +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 24.04.2017 12:47 Milan Crha wrote:
> > [...]
> > I know I can do this for packages I maintain, but
21 matches
Mail list logo
