Hello all,
I agree with Rafal. I think that in the case of small or medium
packages this would be counterproductive.
Kind regards,Silvia
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 01:16 +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 24.04.2017 12:47 Milan Crha <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I know I can do this for packages I maintain, but I though it would
> > make sense to think of it globally. Maybe?
> >
> > Bye,
> > Milan
>
> If I may drop my 2¢… this sounds good to me for large packages,
> for example LibreOffice, glibc and KDE which do it already and
> Evolution as a good candidate to implement this change.
>
> But for small packages which have not so many translatable
> messages producing dozens of small RPMs ~1 kilobyte each or even
> less would doesn't sound like a good solution. So I suggest to
> introduce this feature but not globally and obligatorily for
> all packages.
>
> Additionally, I think that for some purposes installing all
> languages for some specific applications would be useful so
> I also suggest providing something like glibc-all-langpacks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rafal
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
