On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> You can assign pocketsphinx and it's dep sphinxbase to me as I need
> them for a project I'm investigating ATM.
Packagedb is claiming that you are not in the packager group, from
which I conclude that one of the following is true:
- the FAS
There's a new tiny package which provides a python traceback logging in
the journal for python processes. It's very similar to the existing
handler provided by abrt, it also installs itself as sys.excepthook
using a .pth file, but instead of communicating with abrt, it talks to
systemd-coredump dir
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> 7) golang-github-cznic-sortutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's sort
> package (depends on [2])
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431735
>
> 8) golang-github-cznic-strutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's strings
> package (
Cheers all,
I'm trying to do something with a patch in MariaDB, but I need to know
current situation about rotation logs.
*What's the problem:*
Upstream ship rotation log, we drop it out.
This started sometimes between F15 and F16. Mostly because (for what I
read) Fedora didn't like rotation logs
On 14 March 2017 at 21:32, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> gdm does not listen on the network, so whether or not gdm is still
> running after you log doesn't make that much difference. A local user
> can always cause gdm to be launched, by using the switch-user
> functionality.
> It would be
On 14/03/17 20:15 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:46:38PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Christopher wrote:
> Despite such simple to fix bug using static libraries should be removed.
>
> Your comment makes me wonder if there is *any* appropr
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:29:00PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876
> >
> > Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host"
> > Fedora, then the permi
On 14/03/17 19:04 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 22:55 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The review is highly misleading, and the latest spec file does not
include any headers in the package:
%files
%license COPYING
%doc EXTENDING.html FAQ NEWS README
%{_bindir}/arduino-c
On 14/03/17 17:57 +, Christopher wrote:
Your comment makes me wonder if there is *any* appropriate use of
boost-static. If not, why is it even packaged?
For Fedora users to link their own applications against.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 22:55 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The review is highly misleading, and the latest spec file does not
> include any headers in the package:
>
> %files
> %license COPYING
> %doc EXTENDING.html FAQ NEWS README
> %{_bindir}/arduino-ctags
> %{_mandir}/man1/arduino-c
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 23:42 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Silvia Sanchez wrote:
> > >Now I'm confused... Is it 17:00 UTC or 16:00 UTC?
> > >I'm in Germany so at what time should I join?
> >
> > Since Europe hasn
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:55:48AM +0100, Silvia Sanchez wrote:
> >Now I'm confused... Is it 17:00 UTC or 16:00 UTC?
> >I'm in Germany so at what time should I join?
>
> Since Europe hasn't changed time, the meeting is at 16:00 UTC for
> you, ie: one hour
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:34:16 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> During a package review[0], I suggested that a CLI application's header
> files need to go into a -devel subpackage (they are currently not being
> packaged, except for the -debuginfo subpackage.) The reviewer
> disagrees, but fedora-review
On 03/14/2017 05:18 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2017 05:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> On 03/14/2017 05:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I guess if you volume/bind mount the device int
Hello!
During a package review[0], I suggested that a CLI application's header
files need to go into a -devel subpackage (they are currently not being
packaged, except for the -debuginfo subpackage.) The reviewer
disagrees, but fedora-review uses the word must. I went to the
packaging guidelines[1
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:05:20PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 14 March 2017 at 19:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> > This doesn't show much, after being wrapped ;)
> >
>
> OK. Please tell a bit more about what kind of wrapping you been using here
> :)
In mutt your message appe
On 03/14/2017 05:15 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2017 05:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>> On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could
>>> see an iss
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 13/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170312.n.0):
ID: 64840 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: http
On 03/14/2017 05:02 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could
>> see an issue,
>> but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are going
On 03/14/2017 04:56 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I guess if you volume/bind mount the device into the container you could
> see an issue,
> but most containers that deal with /dev/kvm are going to be run as root,
> anyways.
I was running w
On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> I'm fuzzy about the issue faced with containers. Containers will usually
> have a separate /dev that is populated by the container mgmt engine (whether
> docker, libvirt, lxc or something else). That mgmt engine is responsible for
> setting p
On 03/14/2017 04:29 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876
>>
>> Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host"
>> Fedora, then the permissions on the /dev/kv
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876
>
> Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host"
> Fedora, then the permissions on the /dev/kvm device are:
>
> crw---. 1 root root 10, 232 Mar
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> base RHEL install? Or something else?
Bleah yes I've been spending too long today doing RHEL security fixes.
I meant of course the base _Fedora_ install.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.r
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 07:46:38PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Christopher wrote:
>
> > Despite such simple to fix bug using static libraries should be removed.
> >
> > Your comment makes me wonder if there is *any* appropriate use of
> > boost-static. If not, why is
Re: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431876
Currently if you install a minimal-ish, non-"Virtualization Host"
Fedora, then the permissions on the /dev/kvm device are:
crw---. 1 root root 10, 232 Mar 14 15:51 /dev/kvm
(I believe this is because of some kernel defaults for the de
On 14 March 2017 at 19:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> This doesn't show much, after being wrapped ;)
>
OK. Please tell a bit more about what kind of wrapping you been using here
:)
> shows that gdm user is running whole set of processes running in full
> > separated X/Wayland session.
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 19:39 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Is it really needs to be so complicated?
>
> Yeah, mostly.
The login screen is a full gnome-shell instance run by the gdm user, as
you see from your process tree, so yes indeed.
The real problem here is the login screen sh
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 12/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170313.n.0):
ID: 64663 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https:
On 03/14/2017 01:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Why it got pushed to stable?
* gnome-builder now has broken dependencies which is not acceptable
* F25->F26 upgradepath is broken
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-82d76412cf
Hi Igor,
When you see "This update has been submitte
On 14 March 2017 at 17:57, Christopher wrote:
> Despite such simple to fix bug using static libraries should be removed.
>>
>>
>
> Your comment makes me wonder if there is *any* appropriate use of
> boost-static. If not, why is it even packaged?
> I'd be happy to accept your help patching what up
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:37:05PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just started looking why in lat few weeks my gnome desktop los a lot of its
> previous speed. I found that already it is consequence of some issues in
> last chrome. Seems chrome developers managed to kill few most annoying
> The following comment has been added to the beignet-1.3.0-4.fc25
> clang-3.9.1-1.fc25 compiler-rt-3.9.1-1.fc25 gnome-builder-3.22.4-
> 2.fc25 kdevelop-5.0.4-3.fc25 lldb-3.9.1-1.fc25 llvm-3.9.1-1.fc25
> mesa-13.0.4-2.fc25 pocl-0.14-0.3.git3fef5b5.fc25 qt-creator-4.1.0-
> 2.fc25.2 rust-1.15.1-1.fc2
Hi,
Just started looking why in lat few weeks my gnome desktop los a lot of its
previous speed. I found that already it is consequence of some issues in
last chrome. Seems chrome developers managed to kill few most annoying
memory leaks causing that time to time crome processes associated with som
Hi Zbyszek,
thank you for attention!
As I said before, I'm a software developer, and my main areas-of-expertise
are Qt cross-platform applications and c++ network servers. Also I
interesting in ruby language.
I think, that my main strength is simple solutions, such as DataAgregator
utility :)
201
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:18 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
wrote:
>
> On 14 March 2017 at 07:24, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> g++: error: /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a: No such file or
> directory
>
> the thrift buildsystem doesn't treat ppc64le as a 64-bit arch
> with /usr/lib64, probably there is a ha
Le 14/03/2017 à 11:31, Simo Sorce a écrit :
> Hello,
> as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
s/anything/any file/
Some packages own directories there as it is the right place to drop
additional configuration option
On 03/14/2017 12:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:35:17AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on
>>> 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:35 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a reminder that the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages will be
> retired from rawhide shortly after F26 is branched from rawhide. This
> is due to numerous security issues affecting those packages (I just
> counted 204 CV
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:35:17AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on
> > 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname from libldns.so.1 to
> > libldns.so.2 . This soname bump was n
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:47:25PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> So far my idea of maintaining Fedora's iproute package was to do full
> version updates only in Rawhide and backport patches selectively to
> stable versions on behalf of bug reports.
>
> But since stable versions indeed receive f
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 06:35 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on
> > 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname from libldns.so.1 to
> > libldns.so.2 . This soname bump was not anno
So there are no Fedora requirements/recommendations about this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
BackupPC 4.0 has been released but there major changes that prevent a
seamless upgrade and some new dependencies that are not in Fedora.
With version 4.0 hard links are no longer used for deduplication and
instead attribute files are stored in each directory.
While 4.0 is backwards compatible wit
On 14 March 2017 at 07:24, Dan Horák wrote:
> g++: error: /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a: No such file or
> directory
>
> the thrift buildsystem doesn't treat ppc64le as a 64-bit arch
> with /usr/lib64, probably there is a hard-coded list of arches ...
>
Despite such simple to fix bug
On 2017-03-14 08:08, Globe Trotter wrote:
I have been getting notices about revelation being impacted by the
orphaning of libgnome-media-profiles which impacts gnome-python2-desktop.
I do not use gnome or a desktop and I was wondering what would be the
best course in rebuilding this password man
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit)
On armhfp:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1
On ppc64le:
perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.
Hi, we released a new version of the udisks storage management daemon.
The biggest news is actually the name itself -- udisks was replaced by
storaged in Fedora 25[1] but since then we have agreed with udisks
maintainer on merging both projects back (storaged was originally fork
of udisks) usin
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:58:15AM +0300, Михаил Миловидов wrote:
> Hello all!
> I'm a Software Developer and I want to add my utility to the Fedora
> repository.
> The utility is helpfull for me and my collegues (testers and developers) to
> obtain data from multiple servers simultaniosly via ssh
I would start with trying to build the software without that include.
If it can't be done I would try and contact the upstream. Since the
code has not had a release since 2012, I expect it is 'dead' so there
may not be any fixes unless you dive into the code to fix the
requirements yourself.
On 14
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:50:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Hello,
> > as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> > rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
> >
> > My naive reading of the Packag
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Hello,
> as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
>
> My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
> dropped in there by a package, but th
Hello,
I have been getting notices about revelation being impacted by the orphaning of
libgnome-media-profiles which impacts gnome-python2-desktop.
I do not use gnome or a desktop and I was wondering what would be the best
course in rebuilding this password manager.
Thank you.aarem
___
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am the primary point of contact for a handful of voice
> recognition-related packages:
> - cmusphinx3
> - irstlm
> - openfst
> - opengrm-ngram
> - pocketsphinx
> - sphinxbase
> - sphinxtrain
>
> I have not used these pack
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:52:06PM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> 1) golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568
This is duplicated (closed)
>
> 2) golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's rand and
>
Dear Fedora developers,
My name is Xavier and I would like to introduce myself. I am French and
I work in a computing center at CEA, near Paris. I am 35 years old and I
work as a system administrator of supercomputers since 12 years. I use
Fedora since its first release and all the machines in our
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 11:39 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 06:35:17 -0400
> Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26
> > > on
> > > 2017-03-06. This update bumped the sona
Hello All!
Upstream decided to abandon fleet in favor of Kubernetes:
* https://coreos.com/blog/migrating-from-fleet-to-kubernetes.html
I believe we should do the same and retire it. I'll mark it as retired
this weekend (18-19 March).
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
___
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Hello,
> as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
> rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
>
> My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
> dropped in there by a package, but th
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:26 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:10:32 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build the latest version of thrift, and am running into
> > a problem with one of the build tests, which has a dependency on
> > boost-static for "%{_libdir}
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 06:35:17 -0400
Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on
> > 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname from libldns.so.1 to
> > libldns.so.2 . This soname bump was not an
On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 15:10 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ldns was updated from 1.6.17 to 1.7.0 for Rawhide and Fedora 26 on
> 2017-03-06. This update bumped the soname from libldns.so.1 to
> libldns.so.2 . This soname bump was not announced, as it is supposed
> to
> be, and dependent packages we
On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 18:36 +, Christopher wrote:
> I can take it.
>
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:38 AM Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm going to orphan the netty package in Fedora next week since I no
> > longer using it. Please let me know if you are interested in
> > maintainin
Hello,
as per subject, what is the stance on dropping anything there from a
rpm ? Either marked as %{config} or not ?
My naive reading of the Packaging guidelines is that nothing should be
dropped in there by a package, but the guidelines only explicitly talk
about not putting "service" files in t
On 2017-03-10 14:40, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to orphan the netty package in Fedora next week since I no
longer using it. Please let me know if you are interested in
maintaining it.
Here is a list of packages that depend on netty (it's probably
incomplete):
artemis-commons
artemis-
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:10:32 +
Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build the latest version of thrift, and am running into
> a problem with one of the build tests, which has a dependency on
> boost-static for "%{_libdir}/libboost_unit_test_framework.a"
>
> I really have no expertise
66 matches
Mail list logo
