On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:05:20PM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 14 March 2017 at 19:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> > wrote: > > > This doesn't show much, after being wrapped ;) > > > > OK. Please tell a bit more about what kind of wrapping you been using here > :) In mutt your message appears to be wrapped to ~80 columns. I think mine is not wrapped, at least it appears this way to me. But in the web interface, both look the same, bad: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E7WZA3UNFI6PI3KV2SOTB4PEXEBKC2YE/.
> > shows that gdm user is running whole set of processes running in full > > > separated X/Wayland session. > > It's not so bad really. The next-to-last column is cpu time. It's > > completely negligible if you consider that this machine has been up > > since Feb 26. The column before ?/tty1 is RSS, and it's also small. > > gnome-shell is a bit big with 88MB, but that's the price we pay for > > feature-full login screen. > > > > As long as gdm user has some possibility to log in to the system other > users I would be really unhappy to discover that some security bug in those > processes was used to login into my system some parasites :) gdm does not listen on the network, so whether or not gdm is still running after you log doesn't make that much difference. A local user can always cause gdm to be launched, by using the switch-user functionality. It would be nicer of course for it to go away after login, since many people just log in once per reboot. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
