On 29 Mar 2016 18:08, "Ralf Senderek" wrote:
>
> > David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > If we need to repackage the tarball to remove patent-encumbered or
otherwise
> > illegal or non-redistributable files, we cannot do this.
>
> I think , we can. Because the check in %prep should make sure that you've
go
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 01:54 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Kde live i386
> Kde live x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
>
> Images in this compose but not 24-20160323.n.0:
>
> Xfce live x86_64
> Lxde live x86_64
>
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Images in this compose but not 24-20160323.n.0:
Xfce live x86_64
Lxde live x86_64
Design_suite live i386
Workstation raw-xz armhfp
Design_suite live x86_64
Xfce live i386
S
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fadc1e6504
It's missing kf5-ktexteditor and kate, but because of other bodhi update I
will rebuild those tomorrow and include to update (or rdieter will do it ;))
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:44 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Ok, I will prepare libgi
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 20:10 +, John Florian wrote:
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Williamson [mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 23:37
> > To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> > Subject: ddclient orphaned
> >
> > Somehow, somewh
Ralf Senderek wrote:
> I think , we can. Because the check in %prep should make sure that you've
> got the real thing. It doesn't require that you have to package everything
> that makes up the source after extraction. --
We can't. The upstream signatures are for the complete tarballs including
t
On 03/29/2016 11:13 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote:
>> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
>
> If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking
> all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam?
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160328.n.2:
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Docker_base docker x86_64
Images
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016, John Florian wrote:
Somehow, somewhen, I wound up as the main contact for the 'ddclient'
package though I never intended to and know nothing at all about it.
I've noticed this a couple of times before and I guess I looked up why
but I forgot again and I'm sick of it, I don't
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Williamson [mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org]
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 23:37
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: ddclient orphaned
>
> Somehow, somewhen, I wound up as the main contact for the 'ddclient'
> package though I n
> "RD" == Rex Dieter writes:
RD> Perhaps fpc folks missed my recent related post:
That change was actually made quite some time before I sent the
announcement. Sometimes I get behind.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel
#x27;accurate' results will come for a future compose.
So I talked this over with anaconda folks and updated the needles; the
Rawhide-20160329.n.0 tests are re-running now and you'll get an updated
compose check report for it in a few hours with updated openQA results.
There are sti
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
...
> The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
> *
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
> * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
Perhaps fpc
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Eric Griffith wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400
>> Eric Griffith wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
>> >
>> > What's more interesting is..
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:13:45 -0400
Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> uname -r says
>
> 4.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc25.x86_64
>
> dnf info kernel:
>
> Name: kernel
> Arch: x86_64
> Epoch : 0
> Version : 4.6.0
> Release : 0.rc1.git0.1.fc25
> Size: 0.0
> Repo: @Syst
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
> Then it was probably broken by this update:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253
The "LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1" workaround fixed it for me as
well (running Iceweasel on a remote Debian box from a loc
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400
> Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> >
> > There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
> >
> > What's more interesting is.. I've got a system in front of me, and I
> > just installed rawhide-
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:40:05 -0400
Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> There was, once upon a time, but I'm having trouble tracking it down.
>
> What's more interesting is.. I've got a system in front of me, and I
> just installed rawhide-nodebug on it. Recreated Grub, rebooted,
> picked that entry from t
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> If we need to repackage the tarball to remove patent-encumbered or otherwise
> illegal or non-redistributable files, we cannot do this.
I think , we can. Because the check in %prep should make sure that you've got
the real thing.
It doesn't require that you have to pa
On Mar 29, 2016 11:25, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:07:56 -0400
> Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> > Question!
> >
> > Are Alpha images signed to work with Secure Boot? There's a bug Id
> > like to test out once I'm home, but both of my computer's get angry
> > if I turn off Secure Boo
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:07:56 -0400
Eric Griffith wrote:
> Question!
>
> Are Alpha images signed to work with Secure Boot? There's a bug Id
> like to test out once I'm home, but both of my computer's get angry
> if I turn off Secure Boot / the images aren't signed.
Yes.
> As a side point: does
On 27 March 2016 at 05:55, gil wrote:
> can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195
If you're not getting many replies it's because gmail is auto-marking
all your emails as spam: "Why is this message in Spam? It has a from
address in libero.it but has failed liber
Awesome. Thanks Dennis and the rest of release engineering, and the
quality assurance team, and everyone else. Looks like this is shaping
up to be yet another Best Fedora Release Ever!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedor
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 07:15:31PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
> *
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
> * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
Exciting. A little scary. :)
Question!
Are Alpha images signed to work with Secure Boot? There's a bug Id like to
test out once I'm home, but both of my computer's get angry if I turn off
Secure Boot / the images aren't signed.
As a side point: does anyone know if Grub got fixed so that it no longer
crashes / segfaults if it
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
-
The use of rich (or Boolean) dependencies is now OK for F23+.
*
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies
* https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593
-
The ban on the use of the %systemd_
The Fedora 24 Alpha is here, right on schedule for our planned June
final release. Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
- Get Fedora 24 Alpha Workstation https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/
prerelease/
- Get Fedora 24 Alpha Server https://getfedora.org/en/server/prerelease/
- Get Fe
On 03/23/2016 09:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Next week, I plan to upgrade Node.js from the 4.x LTS branch to the 5.x stable
> branch in Rawhide. This upgrade does break backwards-compatibility and thus
> will
> need re-testing of modules. Also, all native NPMs (those that are built with
> ar
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160328.n.2:
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Docker_base docker x86_64
Images
On 03/29/2016 11:30 AM, gil wrote:
> hi
> wrote some spec file (attached) for Insim dependencies
Thank you, but Insim doesn't need to be packaged yet and its
dependencies may change in future. In particular, I intended to replace
usage of rewrite servlet with Jetty or httpd rewrite feature.
--
M
On 03/29/2016 07:18 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[anaconda]
anaconda-core-25.4-1.fc25.x86_64 requires (glibc-langpack-en or
glibc-all-langpacks)
So I think I tricked the dependency checker bot.
Rich dependencies in rpm are kind of new territory, so maybe I'm doing
this wrong. I w
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160328.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160329.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 11
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 45.26 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of upgraded packages: 83.47 MiB
hi
wrote some spec file (attached) for Insim dependencies
regards
.g
Il 29/03/2016 09:07, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
I would like to announce Insim, which is a new web service for
monitoring package installation sizes and other numbers.
Insim checks installation sizes of defined modules (grou
Il 29/03/2016 09:07, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
I would like to announce Insim, which is a new web service for
monitoring package installation sizes and other numbers.
Insim checks installation sizes of defined modules (groups of
packages) and presents this information to user. It's main go
Already running… ^_^
Am 29.03.2016 um 08:55 schrieb Sébastien Willmann:
It seems that kopete, passenger and minetest also need to be rebuilt.
Can you do it too?
2016-03-26 8:30 GMT+01:00 Björn Esser :
Hey folks!
So… The rebuilds have finished without any bigger problems (orthanc was a
bit
I would like to announce Insim, which is a new web service for
monitoring package installation sizes and other numbers.
Insim checks installation sizes of defined modules (groups of
packages) and presents this information to user. It's main goal is to
help developers to optimize package dependenc
36 matches
Mail list logo
