https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fadc1e6504

It's missing kf5-ktexteditor and kate, but because of other bodhi update I
will rebuild those tomorrow and include to update (or rdieter will do it ;))

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:44 AM Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ok, I will prepare libgit2 and related packages update in one week for f24.
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:39 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> >> On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> >>> This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it
>> in
>> >>> f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by
>> >>> some other gnome packages.
>> >>
>> >> I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates
>> separately.
>> >>
>> >> Can you wait with this until we are out of the alpha freeze and gnome
>> >> 3.20.0 builds have gone stable? Like, until early next week or so? This
>> >> should give it a bit time to shake out any libgit2 bugs in rawhide too
>> >> before pushing it to F24.
>> >
>> > I am confused now, I thought libgit2-glib needed libgit 0.24.0 ? Or is
>> the
>> > libgit2-glib that needs the newer libgit2 not in the update yet?
>>
>> Right; a libgit2-glib 0.24.0 update would have to go out together with a
>> libgit2 update. I don't intend to include that in the GNOME 3.20.0
>> megaupdate and would much prefer if we could do these separately. It's
>> just easier to QA if we can split up things a bit here. (Read: I don't
>> want subsurface or kate not working blocking my GNOME update going
>> stable :))
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kalev
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
> --
>
> -Igor Gnatenko
>
-- 

-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to