Hello,
The license of the msgpack package has changed from ASL 2.0 to Boost 1.0
in versions 1.3.0 and later.
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi, I have the original RedHat 6.2 CDs, and have been creating local
RPMs for RH ever since. I am the upstream for the python-pymilter package.
We started with RCS for version control, and moved through CVS and used
bzr for distributed VC. I only started using git in the last few months.
This i
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 06:08 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, to be clear, I still think it's good to sign packages...
Yes, but just signing packages but allowing attacker-controlled
metadata has various issues detailed in the papers linked
from http://theupdateframework.com/
(Mostly forcing the
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:57:55PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:39:16 +
> John Florian wrote:
>
> > > From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 14:49
> > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: Bodhi front pa
I'm building these for rawhide finally. They mostly work, and add
support for python 3.5 (current builds were failing because python 3.4
went away so this is an improvement).
There's at least 1 obvious regression, the complaints about
gi.repository modules (Gtk, GLib, etc.) are back when I run it
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 17:29:14 -0500
Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 04:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Also, repo signing doesn't really get us anything does it?
>
> I believe you have stated previously that because the metalink fetch
> is protected by TLS which chains to sha2
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 04:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Also, repo signing doesn't really get us anything does it?
I believe you have stated previously that because the metalink fetch
is protected by TLS which chains to sha256sums, and hence
GPG is not necessary, I would say it's not the same th
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:32:44 +0100
Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:46:26 +0100
> > Björn Persson wrote:
> > > GPRbuild is
> > > linked to XMLada, and both GPRbuild and XMLada are linked to
> > > libgnat, as are all other Ada programs and libraries.
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:34:00 -0500
Mike McLean wrote:
> That is out of scope as koji will not be actually performing signing
> as part of this feature, just utilizing rpm signatures that have
> already been imported. Neat idea, but bigger problem and not really
> related to this
Also, repo signi
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:39:16 +
John Florian wrote:
> > From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 14:49
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject: Re: Bodhi front page after login
> >
> > On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:17:37 +0100, Reindl Harald wr
Follow the Fedora Guidelines on static linking against
a library. If you really need to use static linking,
you should know that we can not support statically linking
against the C/C++ runtime.
This includes the use of the gcc, clang, or ld option:
-static
-static-.* e.g. -static-libstdc++
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151209
Images in Rawhide 20151209 but not this:
Games live
> From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:mschwe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2015 14:49
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Bodhi front page after login
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:17:37 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> As far as I know, bodhi posts to bugzilla tickets about test
On 12/10/2015 03:12 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 12/10/2015 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
purposes, it may not
On 12/10/2015 01:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
>> dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
>> purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for depend
On 12/10/2015 02:57 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter:
Florian Weimer wrote:
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Require
An update of mapnik has just completed building in rawhide so the soname
has changed to libmapnik.so.3.0 and dependencies will need to be rebuilt.
It think all of the dependencies are mine anyway, so I shall be working
on rebuilding them now.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compto
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter:
> > >Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > >>When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
> > >>dependencies have
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:58:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter:
> >Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> >>When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
> >>dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
> >>purposes, it m
On 12/10/2015 02:32 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies h
On 12/10/2015 11:41 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
run. But are the files already there?
(I'm
On 10.12.2015 00:02, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2015 13:37:12 Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On 12/09/2015 01:04 PM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>> Since this is likely to break networking on a lot of client-side systems, I
>>> would have expected you to do this research before submitting it as
On 12/10/2015 12:53 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
>> dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
>> purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
>> run. But a
Am 10.12.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Rex Dieter:
Florian Weimer wrote:
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
run. But are the fil
Florian Weimer wrote:
> When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
> dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
> purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
> run. But are the files already there?
I think the answer in
Compose started at Thu Dec 10 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
I use icewm and openbox tint2 with a layout that I use I can not see because it
is an indicator keyboard is not in Fedora. One has to wonder what language is
used. So many programs created for this purpose and we do not have one. Example
programs gxkb, xxkb, fbxkb etc.
--
devel mailing list
deve
When a %post scriptlet runs, is it guaranteed that the Requires:
dependencies have been unpacked? I understand that for cycle-breaking
purposes, it may not be true that the scriptlets for dependencies have
run. But are the files already there?
(I'm interested in plain Requires, not Requires(post
28 matches
Mail list logo
