On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:36 PM Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> I've been given a (.net4.5/c# + vmware) project to port to
> Fedora/RHEL (mono + kvm), so I suddenly find myself interested
> in gaining access to late-model official Fedora packages for
> mono (4.0.0 alpha is just out) and monodevelop (cu
I've been given a (.net4.5/c# + vmware) project to port to
Fedora/RHEL (mono + kvm), so I suddenly find myself interested
in gaining access to late-model official Fedora packages for
mono (4.0.0 alpha is just out) and monodevelop (currently at 5.7.0).
The current F21 versions are 2.10.8 and 2.8.8,
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 22 Beta release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bug [1]. More details in meeting
minutes [2].
As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week [3].
The next Go/No-Go meeting is on Thursday, A
On Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:07:55 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 04/08/2015 06:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > the docker base image is part of the Base WG. so it seems wrong to put it
> > on the Cloud page, but we should do something to advertise it more.
>
> But there's no Base WG page or an
- Original Message -
> From: "Przemek Klosowski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:01:19 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
> > I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear me
- Original Message -
> From: "Przemek Klosowski"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:13:49 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
> > On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> > > Usin
With gcc 5.0.0-0.22.fc23 I'm getting new build failures:
http://koschei.cloud.fedoraproject.org/package/gdl
CMakeFiles/gdl.dir/CFMTLexer.cpp.o: In function
`antlr::TokenStreamRecognitionException::toString[abi:cxx11]() const':
/usr/include/antlr/TokenStreamRecognitionException.hpp:34: undefined r
Hi.
I have submitted yumex-dnf for inclusion into fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430
yumex-dnf is a rewritten version of yumex, based on dnf instead of yum
you can check it out here
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/timlau/yumex-dnf
If you want to review it, then ple
Fixed in rawhide now.
Thanks,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 10:36:50AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 01.04.2015 10:29, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> >>> pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned.
> >>
> >> Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this?
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am pm-utils mainta
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
147
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
41
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0862/nodejs-0.10.36-3.el7,libuv-0.10.34-1.el7,v8-3.14.5.10-17.
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1082
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
147
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
135
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1082
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
536
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
301
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
Am 09.04.2015 um 17:01 schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we w
On 04/08/2015 06:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> the docker base image is part of the Base WG. so it seems wrong to put it on
> the Cloud page, but we should do something to advertise it more.
But there's no Base WG page or anything... I know it's sitting there
now, but I don't think end users ca
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 04:39:59 -0400
> From: kpa...@redhat.com
> To: qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: remedy for depcheck inferior architecture issue
>
> I see people asking on #fedora-devel or #fedora-admin about depcheck inferior
> architectu
On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote:
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ the key part of DNF output
Well, OK, but when I just re-run 'dnf update' it updates firefox now:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015
^^^ the key part of DNF output
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 04/08/2015 02:32 AM, Jan Zelený wrote
I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI but we never wanted to
have just another yum. If that was the case, we wouldn't call the project
differently.
I am concerned
Jan Zelený wrote:
> On 7. 4. 2015 at 18:34:49, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Pardon, folks - But haven't we been told dnf was supposed to be yum
> > compatible?
>
> I'm afraid not. From the very beginning, we were sending a clear message that
> we will be as compatible as possible in terms of CLI bu
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-04-09)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:09:52 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-04-09/env-and-stacks.2015-
On 2015-04-09 01:51, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2015-04-08 at 12:20 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Should a failed arch cancel other arch builds in koji? I can understand the
resource saving argument, but I'm finding it increasingly useful to know if a
build failure is arch specific or not an
On 13 Dec 2013 13:31, "Vitaly Kuznetsov" wrote:
>
> Kevin Kofler writes:
>
> > Simone Caronni wrote:
> >>
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html
> >
> > Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the
situation of
> > the 2 projects than your C
On 2015-04-08 11:17, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
W dniu 08.04.2015 o 11:05, drago01 pisze:
We do have dep solvers otherwise no one would notice that a dep is
broken ever. (like libsolv + hawkey).
So what bodhi should do is to ask "has this package all dependencies
satisfied with base + updates +
Compose started at Thu Apr 9 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
Le 09/04/2015 12:41, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
> Koschei [1] can be used to rebuild package after dependency change or
> time elapse. Koschei runs tests enabled during package build.
Among other thing, Koschei is already used to monitor changes in the PHP
stack
http://koschei.cloud.fedoraproject
On 04/09/2015 12:32 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> I have recently heard of Debian Continuous Integration, i.e, automated self
> tests are run for packages whenever its dependencies are updated.
>
> http://ci.debian.net/
>
> Are there any plans to have something similar for Fedora?
Koschei [1] can
Hello,
I have recently heard of Debian Continuous Integration, i.e, automated self
tests are run for packages whenever its dependencies are updated.
http://ci.debian.net/
Are there any plans to have something similar for Fedora?
Regards, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 09/04/15 11:10, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 09/04/15 10:30, Radek Holy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
Radek Holy wrote:
AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things:
1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most
suitable
cannot be installed
2) it skips the r
On 09/04/15 10:30, Radek Holy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
Radek Holy wrote:
AFAIK, YUM's --skip-broken does two things:
1) it selects another version of the requested package if the most suitable
cannot be installed
2) it skips the requested package if none of its versio
On 9. 4. 2015 at 10:31:20, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 09.04.2015 um 10:28 schrieb Jan Zelený:
> > On 9. 4. 2015 at 03:19:02, kendell clark wrote:
> >> hi
> >> I'll add my two cents in. I've had few problems with dnf. That being
> >> said, I usually get an error after every install/update that goes
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Bruno Wolff III"
> To: "Radek Holy"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:03:46 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:22:53 -0400,
> Radek Holy wrote:
> >
> >AFA
I see people asking on #fedora-devel or #fedora-admin about depcheck inferior
architecture issue [1] quite often. Most of them are very confused. Last time I
saw someone asking about this was tonight [2].
We're not able fix this easily, but I think we should finally at least put some
temporary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hi
Yup, will do. Yeah, I figured it was the plugins, not dnf itself. I
may need to remove the offending plugins, if I can figure out which
ones cause the error. As for reviewing the thread, all I can do is
read the emails. If the history isn't there,
Am 09.04.2015 um 10:28 schrieb Jan Zelený:
On 9. 4. 2015 at 03:19:02, kendell clark wrote:
hi
I'll add my two cents in. I've had few problems with dnf. That being
said, I usually get an error after every install/update that goes
something like, snapper. Could not create snapshot error.unknown
c
On 9. 4. 2015 at 03:19:02, kendell clark wrote:
> hi
> I'll add my two cents in. I've had few problems with dnf. That being
> said, I usually get an error after every install/update that goes
> something like, snapper. Could not create snapshot error.unknown
> config: /org.freedesktop.dbus.error. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hi
I'll add my two cents in. I've had few problems with dnf. That being
said, I usually get an error after every install/update that goes
something like, snapper. Could not create snapshot error.unknown
config: /org.freedesktop.dbus.error. This is no
probably you are right. I will take a care tomorrow
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> FYI dnf-plugins-extras is a package that aggregates all plugins that the
> community produces. Bottom line, please don't blame dnf, blame the individual
> plugins.
>
> Reading your problem and
2015-04-09 0:41 GMT+02:00 Dennis Gilmore :
> On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 01:36:11 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Currently the Docker image is located on the Spins page, on the sidebar.
> > I know we also put the images in Docker Hub, but I'd like to pull this
> > under the Cloud p
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Follow-ups Dockah
* Dockerfiles recommended tips
* Dockerfile lint
* Dockerfiles revisiting
* Open Floor
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedora
39 matches
Mail list logo
