----- Original Message ----- > From: "Przemek Klosowski" <przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 5:13:49 PM > Subject: Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum
> On 04/09/2015 11:05 AM, Michal Luscon wrote: > > On 04/09/2015 05:01 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > > > Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015 > > > > > ^^^ the key part of DNF output > > Well, OK, but when I just re-run 'dnf update' it updates firefox now: > > Using metadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015 > > > ^^^ same timestamp as before, but different result > > > ... > > > Dependencies resolved. > > > ... > > > firefox x86_64 37.0.1-1.fc21 updates 69 M > > This is a definition of craziness: you do the same thing twice and expect a > different return. In the end, I can't say that it doesn't work but I have an > uneasy feeling that I do not understand how an essential part of my system > works. The reason is that even if metadata of the "updates" repository have been refreshed, there is probably another repository with matadata from Fri Apr 3 03:24:08 2015 (it has probably longer expiration period). So, yes, I agree that this is confusing. Do you have a better idea than printing the timestamp for each repository? -- Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
