Hello,
I'm trying to make an update for #1071795 using 'fedpkg build' for
gnutls fails consistently for f20 and rawhide with the error:
"BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with status
30; see root.log for more information"
Although it says see root.log, I don't see anythin
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> I have a F20 I switched to Rawhide on host gx150. Shortly after getting KDE
> started, the system reboots. Something similar happens in openSUSE:
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856606
>
> Older releases are OK, so hardware should
On 03/01/2014 05:32 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Is there any chance of being able to do epel-7-ppc64 copr builds anytime
in the near future? I'd to test if a particular fix to gcc will fix an
ICE I'm seeing while compiling eigen3. copr seems to be the only tool
that could be available to me to d
On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:35 PM, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 04:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> The servers were rented with a Fedora produced default/automatic/guided
>> partitioning layout? If not, your example is out of scope. We are only
>> talking about this context specifically, not
On 03/01/2014 04:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
The servers were rented with a Fedora produced
default/automatic/guided partitioning layout? If not, your example is
out of scope. We are only talking about this context specifically, not
arbitrary examples for shrinking a file system. The Fedora
aut
I have a F20 I switched to Rawhide on host gx150. Shortly after getting KDE
started, the system reboots. Something similar happens in openSUSE:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856606
Older releases are OK, so hardware should still be working OK. Memtest86+
found no errors in one fu
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 10:24:45AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > There was a *great* talk at either FOSDEM or DevConf about what
> > OpenSUSE is using for automation of their UIs.
> > It's all open source,
> > easy to create the scr
Am 02.03.2014 19:38, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> Is it reasonable to expose untested features in the UI? RAID 1 and RAID 10
> are probably
> reasonably well tested because they meet the requirements (and then some) for
> many use
> cases. We have test cases for them. There are no RAID 4 or RAID 6 t
On Mar 2, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
>>> Okay, I'll bite. Why not rootfs on raid6?
>
>> It's pathological.
>
> Sick? Non-functional? Unlucky?
Compulsive as in doing something merely because it can be done, but also not
well-behaved, and counter
Hi,
I'm back.
2014-02-22 11:19 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge :
> Does that also mean, you're changing jobs? You mentioned something like
> you're at least interested in a jobs at Red Hat in the cloud area?
>
>
Sadly enough, I haven't changed jobs, yet.
I can't dwell upon this topic on a public list
On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> There was a *great* talk at either FOSDEM or DevConf about what
> OpenSUSE is using for automation of their UIs.
> It's all open source,
> easy to create the scripts using a GUI, and you can fiddle around with
> bits of Javascript to fin
On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 02:58:41PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:56:52PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> > wrote:
>
> [. . .]
>
> > SELinux working with it now.
> > dargo01: I think that statement may be evolving ?
>
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe we should add guidelines for bitbucket. That could be very
> similar to github's template:
>
> ===
> %global owner $OWNER
> %global tag $TAG
> %global commit $COMMIT
> %global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; ech
On 02/27/2014 02:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/2014 12:18 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 5:33 PM, Josef Bacik mailto:jo...@toxicpanda.com>> wrote:
Just popping in here to say that btrfs is not ready to be default
in Fedora y
On 03/02/2014 01:17 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Can we get some definition of "legacy" here? kernel/nfs-utils versions?
>
I'd have to check what I can share. If it helps: not current RHEL or
recent Fedora, until recently some that were over five years old. Also
this comment in the XFS FAQ: "Beware th
On 03/01/2014 10:19 PM, Jon wrote:
The inability to shrink or reduce XFS is rather disappointing. I've
seen a few sarcastic remarks along the lines of (paraphrased): why
would anyone ever want to shrink a volume?
If you use a dm-thin target with a shared storage pool (even if the file system
i
On 03/01/2014 08:51 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Chris Murphy said:
>There are good reasons to use XFS by default for Server.
Are they listed somewhere?
XFS has many advantages:
* best performance for most workloads (especially with high speed storage and
larger number of core
On 02/28/2014 07:56 AM, James Wilson Harshaw IV wrote:
Yet what was the main point that it wasn't ready yet? My point is we should
choose the best solution, even if it takes a little more work to get it up and
running. I want to know what it will take to make sure btrfs is good to go as
default
On 02/28/2014 06:20 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
by default we put ext4 on LVM
The tool works in this use-case unless something has broken it recently.
It can be done, the convert tool should work, and Btrfs should work
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:03:38PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What I came up with is this gem:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix
[...]
> Some of this is susceptible to automation, but some is not, in the sense
> that it involves the UI, and automated UI tes
Chris Murphy writes:
> > Okay, I'll bite. Why not rootfs on raid6?
> It's pathological.
Sick? Non-functional? Unlucky?
> There are too many simpler, faster, more resilient options
> considering rootfs at most isn't bigger than the average SSD: Two or
> three SSDs + n-way mirroring. RAID 10
Hi,
Maybe we should add guidelines for bitbucket. That could be very
similar to github's template:
===
%global owner $OWNER
%global tag $TAG
%global commit $COMMIT
%global shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:12})
...
Source0:https://bitbucket.org/%{owner}/%{name}/ge
On 1 March 2014 21:37, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 03/01/2014 02:30 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>> On 1 March 2014 18:57, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 12:04 +, Ian Malone wrote:
On 28 February 2014 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 23:16 -0700, Chris Mur
Hi,
can somebody please review package systeminfo, it is there for several
months, i am new to package maintaining. Thanks.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code o
Le 28/02/2014 15:25, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> PHP 5.6.0 will be soon in "beta" stage.
> (5.6.0alpha3 is available and should be the last alpha)
>
>
> So I start working on PHP 5.6 packaging.
>
> For those interested, for now, this happens in my personal repository
> (remi-dev).
>
> Fedo
25 matches
Mail list logo
