Am 02.03.2014 19:38, schrieb Chris Murphy: > Is it reasonable to expose untested features in the UI? RAID 1 and RAID 10 > are probably > reasonably well tested because they meet the requirements (and then some) for > many use > cases. We have test cases for them. There are no RAID 4 or RAID 6 test cases, > so should > users be permitted to choose untested options?
wrong direction - if we are talk about Fedora.next the main question is why are they not tested and not "don't use them because we don't test" as said: if Fedora wants to compete with commercial solutions where nobody spends a second to consider if RAID5/RAID6 is supported for whatever because it is unconditional clear you argue the wrong direction there are people using RAID6 for *anything* because it is *common knowledge* that after one disk fails the chance due rebuild have another one fails is way too high and RAID10 does *not* help here if it comes to important data the problem of RAID10 is that the right one second disks needs to fail and you can hardly chose that - in case of important data you must not need to hope, you need safety
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
