On Qua, 2014-02-19 at 23:45 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:40:41PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > > Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> > > build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> > > buildvm-26.phx2 and do
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:06:53 -0700
>> Dave Johansen wrote:
>>
>> > I'm trying to build qt-creator 3.0.1 for EL6 and have suc
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:40:41PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> > build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> > buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
> >
> >
> >
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've seen this a few times and it was something wacky in ~/.pki/
>
> can you try a 'mv ~/.pki ~/.pki.sav' and see if it works?
That did the trick. Thanks for the _very_ quick help. :-)
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:26:06PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
> build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
> buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
>
>
> http:/
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:35:22 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-(
>
> % fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
> Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
> Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure
Something seems to be wrong with 'fedpkg new-sources' here. :-(
% fedpkg new-sources libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
Uploading: 329a61fa3c30acf46efef1a9221b2054 libuv-v0.10.25.tar.gz
Could not execute new_sources: Lookaside failure: (60, "Peer's
certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the use
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:27 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > > On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
> >
> > > Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
> > > u
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:27 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
>
> > Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
> > use version of the package to be soname version of the library. Howev
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 18:03 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:12 -0600, Jon wrote:
> > As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
> > would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
> >
> > The implication is "users would have to pick a -con
Hi,
Sorry I'm little busy right now, to detail much but I submit the same
build twice, one ended in arm builder and fails the other ended in
buildvm-26.phx2 and don't failed, so I though this much be reported ...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6549489
http://koji.fedorapr
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 15:12 -0600, Jon wrote:
> As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
> would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
>
> The implication is "users would have to pick a -config/-preset package
> and then e.g. adjust things"
>
> This on
As far as two (or more) fedora-presets' being installed at once, I
would say we allow the user to resolve the problem via .rpmnew
The implication is "users would have to pick a -config/-preset package
and then e.g. adjust things"
This only works if the preset file has the same name across all the
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:12:38PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> #topic #382 Go Packaging Guidelines Draft
> .fpc 382
> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382
I won't be around at the time of the meeting -- I don't know if I'm needed,
or if some of the other people with interest in Go can show
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-02-20 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-02-20 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2014-02-20 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2014-02-20 1
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:33:43PM -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47700
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47700/0001-Ticket-47700-Unresolved-external-symbol-references-b.2.patch
> git patch file (master, take2) -- Using ld option "-z defs", cleane
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>
> I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict.
>
> You didn't reply to the part of my mail where I was describing the
> "Workstation on a Server" case.
>
Sorry, i read that as
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict.
You didn't reply to the part of my mail where I was describing the
"Workstation on a Server" case. Are you saying that you do not believe
this case is valid? Or that such users would
On 19 February 2014 18:16, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For those
> who really want a GUI package installer, the old gpk is still available
> in a not-installed-by-default package (though I assume Richard will
> eventually drop it), and yumex is always an option.
There are quite a few distros that ha
On Wed, 19.02.14 18:31, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> >fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in
> >packages for the experience of th
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in packages
> for the experience of the product.
>
> 1
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
fedora-config- it could put other config snippets, or pull in
packages for the experience of the product.
Yes, we could potentially obsolete the NetworkManager-config-server
On 02/19/2014 01:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
Looking around to some other projects (e.g. v8) people usually tend to
use version of the package to be soname version of the library. However,
I see some questions raised by that approach:
A pretty detailed
On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 14:38 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 February 2014 21:43, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
> > If we are providing a next-generation UI for installing, to replace yum
>
> That's not what we're doing.
To expand a bit: insofar as Software - the tool we're discussing here,
an
If upstream (in this case ubuntu) renamed it totally makes sense to
rename. As for the rpm implications I believe you:
1) notify the list package(s) renaming
2) add the appropriate Obsoletes tag in the new packages
That's it I think? someone else may want to weigh in tho.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if it makes sense to rename the cloud-utils
(sub-)package for EPEL7 and F21.
Upstream (Ubuntu) used to have a single package named cloud-utils which we
decided to split up into two packages, cloud-utils and
cloud-utils-growpart. The reason being that cloud-utils pulls
Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) said:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date
Hi All,
I have submitted a package for a bioinformatics tool - autodocksuite for
review.
Can someone please review the package for inclusion in Fedora?
Here is the review request -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067041
Thanks.
Regards,
Mukundan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:27:41 -0600
> Jon wrote:
>
> > Propose the unit file be packaged.
> >
> > * Releng does not want this in fedora-release.
> Not true, just not convinced its the best place for it. If it turn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:30:46 +0530
Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:18:12AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Feb 18 19:39:04 UTC 2014
> >
> > Broken deps for i386
> > ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:27:41 -0600
Jon wrote:
> Propose the unit file be packaged.
>
> * Releng does not want this in fedora-release.
Not true, just not convinced its the best place for it. If it turns out
it really is the best place then I will gla
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date -d '
On 01/15/2014 04:16 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
What should one do if the SW he is trying to package produce only
unversioned *.so files? I'm currently trying to package LMDB [1] as
possible alternative for BerkeleyDB in Fedora, and the hand-written
makefile produce only liblmdb.so.
I'm trying to pers
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:23:02AM +0100, Sancho Lerena wrote:
> I submitted a package for review / looking for SPONSOR some weeks ago, but it
> stills waiting, is there anyone who want to help me with this package ?.
> Pandora FMS is a monitoring software, and this is the agent for Linux.
>
> h
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets below
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 07:47 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>
> 2) if you know that some machines change fingerprint and you *trust it*
> you can do:
>
> ~/.ssh/config:
> Host 192.168.1.1
> UserKnownHostsFile /dev/n
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:18:12AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Tue Feb 18 19:39:04 UTC 2014
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> [koji]
> koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst
Ping^2?
From what I
37 matches
Mail list logo
