On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote:
>
> i think limiting to systemd is wrong. maybe the package should be
> fedora-config-<foo> it could put other config snippets, or pull in packages
> for the experience of the product.
>
> 1) We have to consider what happens when multiple of these things are
> installed simultaneously.
>
I think it's perfectly fine to have them conflict. We ship the product's
default configuration in RPMs, we have never expected users to do all their
configuration by RPMs. So a user would start with a
fedora-config-<product> and then modify it manually,.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
